PART I
Rise to Power
1
In My Lord the Cardinalâs Service
Well might many a famous individual from the past, were he able to read historyâs verdict on him, echo the cry of Shakespeareâs Cassio: âReputation, reputation, reputation! I have lost my reputationâ.1
In our times â despite the sterling labours of the late Professor G.R. Elton â the very mention of Thomas Cromwellâs name is likely to conjure up a baleful spectre in the minds of many. He was, we are repeatedly informed, the chief destroyer of a vibrant, idyllic English medieval church, the man who plundered the monasteries and consigned to oblivion centuries of pious, devotional tradition, imposing in its place an alien creed of justification by faith alone; the prime instigator and enforcer of harsh Tudor treason laws; a ruthless, sinister, unsmiling Machiavellian who cynically cut down Anne Boleyn and all others who dared oppose him, before finally receiving his much deserved deserts when he overreached himself and lured King Henry into an disastrously unsuitable marriage with Anne of Cleves.
I do not remember for sure what made me first begin to wonder whether all of this might be largely fanciful, and whether the real Thomas Cromwell, if only we could meet him and become better acquainted, might take on a less fearsome and altogether more agreeable aspect. It was not a craving to be novel just for the sake of it, but what began as no more than a hunch quickly developed into a conviction. Readers will be able to decide for themselves if they care to go down the same route.
Like many substantial and controversial men in history, only patchy details about Cromwellâs early life are known. The main sources are Eustace Chapuys, imperial ambassador to England during much of the 1530s; Reginald, later Cardinal Pole; Matteo Bandello, the Italian writer who became bishop of Agen in France; and John Foxe, the Elizabethan historian and martryologist. Of these four Chapuys knew Cromwell best, but even he is frustratingly brief. Cromwell, says Chapuys, was the âson of a poor blacksmith who lived and is buried at a small villageâ near London. His uncle was cook to Archbishop Warham. In his youth Cromwell was somewhat âill conditioned and wildâ (mal conditionnĂ©), and he spent some time in prison before travelling in Flanders, Rome and throughout Italy. The reason for the imprisonment is not stated.2
Reginald Pole also knew Cromwell personally, though not as well as Chapuys did. Pole confirms Cromwellâs birth near London, but calls his father a cloth shearer. Cromwell, Pole continues, then became a private soldier in Italy before pursuing a more secure, if less adventurous, way of life as an accountant in the service of a Venetian merchant.3
The Italian connection is taken up by Bandello, with his engaging story of the wealthy Florentine merchant, Francesco Frescobaldi, chancing one day to meet âa poor youthâ (un povero giovane) in the streets begging alms âfor the love of Godâ. Seeing him âin a bad condition though gentle in appearanceâ (mal in arnese e che in viso mostrava aver del gentile), Frescobaldi was moved to pity, especially when he learned that the youth hailed from England, a country he knew and loved. He asked him his name. âMy name is Thomas Cromwellâ, he replied, âthe son of a poor cloth shearerâ (dâun povero cimatore di panni). He had escaped from the battle of Garigliano in Italy where he served as a page or servant to an infantryman, carrying his pike. Frescobaldi invited Master Cromwell into his house as his guest and offered him shelter, food and clothing. After a short stay he gave him money and a new horse. Thus refreshed and replenished, the grateful youth set out to return to England.4
These accounts complement rather than contradict each other, though with one interesting exception. Cromwellâs father was a âsmithâ (Chapuys) but a âcloth shearerâ (Pole, Bandello). Foxe clarifies the matter with the information that Cromwell âwas born in Putney or thereabouts, being a smithâs son, whose mother married afterwards to a shearmanâ. So the smith was Cromwellâs natural father and the shearman (or shearer) the step-father. Foxe gives no reason why his mother married again, but the only obvious one, unless the second marriage was illegal, is that his father, the smith, died shortly after Thomas was born. So it is not certain whether Cromwell was the name of the father or step-father.
Foxe also disagrees with Chapuys and Bandello on Cromwellâs youth. Bandello has Cromwell arriving in Italy after âfleeing from my fatherâ (che fuggendo da mio padre), which Foxe, in a curiously slanted translation, renders as âstraying from my countryâ. Elsewhere Foxe, still on the subject of the young Cromwell, tells us that âa great delight came into his mind to stray into foreign countries, to see the world abroad and to learn experienceâ â quite a different reason for leaving England than the one given by either Chapuys or Bandello. At first it seems that Foxe might have wanted to cover up the youthful waywardness of one of his greatest heroes. However, this explanation will not do, because later it is Foxe who tells us that Cromwell, as Wolseyâs agent, long before he became a Lutheran, was very active in procuring bulls and pardons from Rome. Foxe also quotes Cromwell telling Cranmer that he had been a bit of a âruffianâ in his younger days, though Foxe includes this in his discussion of Cromwellâs pre-Protestant years, not his actual youth.5
Fortunately these small variations are not very important. They can easily be explained by the fact that none of these witnesses knew all the details of Cromwellâs birth and youth at first hand. Besides, no comprehensive records of births, marriages and deaths were kept until an act of parliament prepared by the adult Cromwell in 1538 required them.
According to Merriman, a certain Walter Cromwell was Thomasâs father. As Merriman notes, however, this name appears in records of antiquity from 1475 right up to 1514, so he could not have been the natural father, who, unless Foxe is greatly mistaken, must have died sometime before 1500. It is just as unlikely that Walter was the step-father, because he is described in the Close Rolls as a brewer of beer (âberebruerâ), not a shearer. He was also a man of some means. As well as his beer business he kept sheep and cattle, he became Constable of Putney in 1495, and he owned lands and property in Wimbledon. This information fits neither the description of Thomasâs father as a poor smith, nor his step-father as a poor shearer. Walter and Thomas Cromwell may have been related, but it is difficult to see how they could have been father and son.6
Cromwellâs mother came from Derbyshire or Staffordshire. Her maiden name may have been âMeverellâ. According to Cromwell himself, in a conversation with Chapuys, she was fifty-two years old when he was born. The motherâs age suggests that Thomas was the youngest child and perhaps an unexpected one. If, therefore, the father died soon after the birth, and the mother married again to a shearer, as Foxe says, it is quite plausible that tensions soon arose between the poor shearer and his energetic and perhaps unruly stepson. A troubled and unhappy childhood, therefore, provided the impulse for the young Thomas to seek his fortune abroad.7
A sort of reverse reasoning dates Cromwellâs birth to around 1485. Time is needed for him to become old enough to do a spell in prison, as Chapuys says, before venturing out on his own. The battle of Garigliano was fought in late December 1503, so it would have been sometime the following year, maybe spring, before he could have reached Florence and met Frescobaldi. That would put him in his eighteenth year, still young enough to be called a âyouthâ.
The matter is, however, somewhat complicated by Stephen Vaughan, a close friend of the adult Cromwell, who knew him better than any of the witnesses named so far. In the middle of a long letter on various points, Vaughan urged Cromwell not to wear himself out through overwork, warning enigmatically that âhalf your years be spentâ. This letter is dated December 1534. It is not clear how long Vaughan expected Cromwell to live. If he meant the biblical âthree score years and ten ⊠or four score yearsâ for those who have the strength (Psalm 90:10), then Cromwell would have been thirty-five or forty at the time. This gives two alternative dates for his birth â 1499 and 1494. The first is far too early for Garigliano in 1503, and even the second would make Cromwell only eight or nine when he fled from England and joined the French army. Vaughan may have meant Cromwellâs years of discretion, normally regarded as beginning at around the age of twelve, which would take us back to approximately 1485. However, it may well be that Vaughan was simply using a figure of speech, never imagining that anyone would try and calculate the time of Cromwellâs birth from it. As Vaughan merely blurs an already indistinct picture, the traditional date of 1485 should suffice until or unless some more positive evidence turns up.8
Nothing is known about Cromwell for some years after his meeting with Frescobaldi. However, despite the lack of a formal education, the adult Cromwell was a proficient linguist â he was fluent in French, Italian, Spanish, Latin and Greek â so it is likely that he travelled extensively across southern Europe. His adventures there remain a mystery.
Around 1510 it so happened that the town of Boston in England needed to renew two papal pardons, and one Geoffrey Chambers and a companion were sent as messengers to Rome with provisions and money. Chambers met Cromwell in Antwerp, and because Cromwell could speak Italian, he was persuaded to accompany the two Englishmen to the eternal city. At that time Cromwell had âno sound taste or judgement of religionâ, sighed Foxe, the source for this story. Cromwell showed an inventive streak, however, in his plan to persuade Pope Julius to grant Bostonâs requests speedily. Cromwell prepared âsome fine dishes of jelly ⊠made after our country manner here in Englandâ; he then waited patiently until Julius returned from a hunting expedition before approaching him with presents and a âthree manâs songâ, again in the âEnglish fashionâ. The dainty jelly dishes so delighted the Vicar of Christ that he authorised the pardons with little more ado.9
By 1512 Thomas Cromwell, with mind broadened and horizons widened by his foreign travels, had settled in England. In November that year, in his new career as a lawyer, he endorsed a legal document entitling one Thomas Empson to lands. He had not given up his interest in commerce, however, and two years later he again paid a visit to the great trading city of Antwerp. Around this time he married Elizabeth Wykys, the daughter of a shearman, and apparently a fairly well-to-do shearman for she descended from an ancient family, one of whom had served as gentleman-usher to King Henry VII. Practically nothing is known about Cromwellâs marriage except that at least two daughters and one son survived infancy. Merrimanâs idea that Cromwell married mainly for money is no more than an uncharitable guess, and there is no reason to doubt that Thomas and Elizabeth Cromwell were a happy couple.10
Possibly in 1514, definitely by 1516, Cromwell became part of Cardinal Wolseyâs household. He went to Rome a second time in 1517â18, again for rea...