Irish History Matters

Politics, Identities and Commemoration

Brian M. Walker, Professor Brian M. Walker

• Publisher: THP Ireland
• Year: 2019
• Print ISBN:
  9780750991292
• eBook ISBN:
  9780750991896
• Topic: History
• Subtopic: Historiography
• Index: History

While knowledge of history can explain our contemporary situation, an awareness of the myths and misuses of our history can bring a broader and more conciliatory approach to current political and social challenges. History or, more correctly, 'views of the past' or 'historical myths' have shaped politics in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. These views served in part to cause and sustain the 'Troubles'. Eventually, many historical perceptions were challenged, which helped to promote the peace process. New ideas of revised and shared history were important. These changes are explored here. The public expression of history in Ireland through commemoration of important historical events and persons is investigated in a number of chapters. The impact of historical developments on identity is studied not just in Ireland, north and south, but also among the Irish diaspora, especially in America. In Irish History Matters, Brian M. Walker uses three decades of research to explore the effects historical events have had on Irish politics and society, and why they still have an important influence today.

PART 1

PAST AND PRESENT

1

THE PAST AND THE PRESENT: HISTORY, IDENTITY AND THE PEACE PROCESS

A sense of history is often important for the identity of individuals, communities and, particularly, national communities. Ideas of history are communicated in various ways such as commemorations, academic histories, popular accounts, myths and songs. These are learned in the home, in the school or in the public arena. They serve to provide a historical narrative at the core of the identity of both individuals and national groups. This historical story helps to provide people with an understanding not only of their past but of where they are today. It can give members of society a collective memory that serves to give unity and sense of purpose for the contemporary world. All this is true as regards the role of history throughout modern Europe. Ireland, north and south, is no exception. Nor is it unusual in a European context that in Ireland there are often strongly different and conflicting views of history, arising from important national and religious divisions. What is unusual, in the case of Ireland, is the widespread belief held strongly by many until recently that matters in Ireland are greatly influenced by history and that events of the past determine the present to an exceptional degree.

The importance of the past for the present in Ireland has often been noted by people from outside as well as inside the country. In October 1996 the South African church leader Michael Cassidy remarked about Ireland: ‘One notices how people are gripped by the past, remembering the past, feeding on the past; people are constantly remembering this betrayal or that battle; … this martyr or this murderer.’ He concluded that ‘these realities of the past feed into the present in Ireland more than anywhere I have been’.¹ Indeed, in 1992, the novelist Dermot Bolger felt compelled to protest that in Ireland ‘we must go back three centuries to explain any fight outside a chip shop’.² In speeches in the 1990s, the American President, Bill Clinton, made frequent mention of the role of ‘ancient enmities’ in Northern Ireland.³

In the comments of Ian Paisley we find many references to unionists’ ‘traditional enemies’.⁴ In 1971 he declared: ‘God has been our help in 1641, 1688, 1690, 1798, 1912, 1920, and He will not fail us in the future.’⁵ In 1996 Ruari Ó Brádaigh of Republican Sinn Féin was reported to have stated: ‘In Ireland we have no need of your Che Guevaras and your Ho Chi Minhs. We have Robert Emmet, O’Donovan Rossa, Cathal Brugha, Dan Breen.’⁶ Later commentators have often seen the success of the peace process as evidence of triumph over such historical forces. During a visit to Northern Ireland in 2009 the American Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, remarked on how ‘ancient hatreds have yielded to new hopes’.⁷

Can we say that the history of Ireland has special importance for the present and that Ireland has a unique past? The answer to this is that history is as significant for the contemporary world in Ireland as for anywhere else, but no more significant than in other countries. The shape of politics and society in Ireland is influenced by historical developments, but that history is neither unique nor responsible for predetermining political conflict among the inhabitants of Ireland. In seventeenth-century Germany and the Netherlands, as in Ireland, there was also bitter religious and political conflict, but such a history does not determine events today in these countries, even though it has had influence on the modern world. What is very important in all these countries is the more modern history of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, which has affected the shape of their societies and influenced the present.

In the case of Ireland, it is not correct to say that historical events here were more dreadful or more deterministic for the future than elsewhere in Europe. In 1942 Nicholas Mansergh wrote that the history of Ireland ‘is no more unhappy than that of other small nations in Europe, the Belgians, the Serbs, the Poles, or the Greeks’.⁸ These comments by Mansergh are fair in relation to the early history of Ireland and these other countries. They are not fair, however, in relation to the more recent past, when these countries experienced dreadful events that Ireland avoided. The Greeks suffered very substantial population expulsions and deaths in the early 1920s, and all these countries were invaded by the German army, 1939–42, which led to heavy loss of life.

For Ireland, north and south, what has been critically important for the contemporary world has been matters relating to present-day problems, in particular over nationalism but also over religion. These problems have affected many other parts of Europe. Such challenges to both politicians and citizens do not relate to a special history that predetermines the present. At the same time, it is clear that many people have believed this to be the case. There has been a strong belief that these historical roots are especially important and lie at the heart of conflict in Ireland. Such a view is challenged here.

Nonetheless, it is clear that ‘views of the past’, ‘historical perceptions’ or ‘historical myths’ have been very important. Often, such ideas are part of a sense of history, which individuals or communities have created for themselves in response to contemporary challenges or needs. It is argued here that, even though the situation in Ireland is not influenced by special historical circumstances, such strongly and widely held perceptions are of considerable significance and must be taken seriously. These views have served to inform and shape the main political identities in Ireland and have helped in part to cause the conflict and violence that persisted for three decades from the late 1960s. Efforts to challenge these historical perceptions have played an important role in the emergence of reconfigured identities, which have allowed significant reconciliation.

Reasons for and Consequences of these Historical Perceptions

Anthony D. Smith has observed in his book, National Identity, that historical memories have been very important for the creation of national identity in our modern world.⁹ It is a common feature of nineteenthand twentieth-century nationalist movements in Europe that they developed or ‘constructed’ historical traditions as part of their ideology, and this has been true of both unionism and nationalism in Ireland.¹⁰ It has also been noted that history remains more significant in modern societies divided over national and religious matters than in those where these problems have been resolved or do not matter.¹¹ This has certainly been the case in Ireland. History can provide the explanation and means of personal and public discourse by which people understand and articulate the debate over the main national/religious problems.

Often these accounts of the past are selective or based partly on myths, and are closer to what Walker Connor has called ‘sentient or felt history’ rather than ‘chronological or factual history’.¹² Nonetheless, such views have remained important for many. This historical dimension has often seemed plausible, because in our dominant Anglo-American world people until recently have been unable to understand the importance of ethnic/national/religious conflict, so this historical explanation has appeared a sensible one.¹³ For many, both in Ireland and outside, to blame the situation on history has seemed reasonable. In the early twenty-first century, of course, there is a better understanding of such conflict.

Historical narratives, created from actual historical experiences and from myths and selective views that surround them, have served to give the past an important role in the identity of individuals and national communities in Ireland, north and south. A.T.Q. Stewart has remarked: ‘To the Irish all history is applied history and the past is simply a convenient quarry which provides ammunition to use against enemies in the present.’ He continued: ‘when we say that the Irish are too much influenced by the past, we really mean that they are too much influenced by Irish history, which is a different matter.’¹⁴

We often find references to historical events in speeches by politicians from Northern Ireland, as, for example, in the debate at Westminster in 1985 on the Anglo-Irish Agreement.¹⁵ John Hume talked of events of 1912, stating that the ‘divisions in Ireland go back well beyond partition’, and referred to the United Irishmen and C.S. Parnell. In the same debate, Ian Paisley declared: ‘Anyone who has read history should understand that this did not start in 1920, but goes far back to the days of the plantation settlement and back into the dim and distant past.’ In his presidential address to the Fianna Fáil Ard Fheis, on 26 February 1983, Charles J. Haughey declared that ‘the right to territorial integrity is derived from history. From time immemorial the island of Ireland has belonged to the Irish people’.¹⁶

Members of paramilitaries have often been influenced by a strong historical sense. In his study of their many periodicals and journals over the period 1966–92, Richard Davis has described ‘the attitude of republicans and loyalists to a history which both acknowledge as fundamental to their respective positions’.¹⁷ A former IRA volunteer, Shane Paul O’Doherty, has described his reasons for joining the organisation: ‘My attraction to the IRA was not initially based on the sight or experience of any particular social injustice, though, when I did join the IRA, injustices were foremost in my motivation. It was the discovery of the tragedies of Irish history which first caused my desire to give myself to the IRA …’¹⁸ Others joined because of events after 1969, but then they would have become very aware of this historical dimension, with its emphasis on matters such as the 1916 Rising and the 1918 general election. A belief in the physical force of historical tradition was integral to the role of the IRA in the late twentieth century. When the first of the loyalist paramilitary groups was founded in 1965, it very consciously called itself the Ulster Volunteer Force, after the 1912 unionist organisation of that name. Loyalist paramilitaries, as psychologist Geoffrey Beatty has pointed out, have used the Battle of the Somme to ‘sanction their own actions in a very different sort of combat’.¹⁹

Such historical narratives, however, have been not only an important part of people’s identity in Ireland: they have also served to impede efforts to achieve political accommodation. They have helped to give selective, incomplete and often inaccurate pictures to communities of their own history, and little or no understanding of the experiences of other communities. In the past in Northern Ireland the formal school system had little direct part in the sense of history held by the public, because there was little Irish history on the curriculum. In a press interview in February 1998, the Northern Ireland Protestant playwright, 34-year-old Gary Mitchell, said: ‘We never learned Irish history at school, which was really strange. It was all English history geared towards the exams. We didn’t do 1798, even though, woops, Wolfe Tone and Henry McCracken were Protestants.’²⁰ People picked up knowledge of their history from songs, popular historical accounts or annual commemorations of important events or individuals from the past.

For many in the Protestant and unionist community, their sense of history focused on events such as the Siege of Derry and the Battle of the Boyne in the seventeenth century and the Battle of the Somme in the twentieth century, which served to explain themselves as a people who have faced siege and sacrifice from these earlier times to the present. This historical narrative does relate to historical experiences of that community, but is selective and contains myths. It ignores periods when Protestants were not greatly concerned about such events, when they were divided, and when they co-operated with Catholics, as in the United Irishmen of the 1790s.

Among nationalists, there was a historical narrative of an heroic Irish people who had suffered invasion and conquest but who always survived. In 1994 Bernadette McAliskey recalled how she learned her history from her father, ‘everything from the tales of the Tuatha De Dannan, and Celtic mythology, to Larkin and Connolly’.²¹ In a newspaper article in 1994, John Hume wrote of the ‘traditional nationalist philosophy with which we all grew up – a philosophy that the essence of patriotism – à la 1916 – was the nobility of dying for Ireland and struggling against the British occupation of Ireland’. He referred not only to northern but also to southern ‘traditional nationalist thinking’. He stated: ‘All the major parties in the dáil were born out of that philosophy and their founders were the progenitors of it.’²²

In the south, nationalist opinion retained a strong historical dimension, supported in this case by the education system and the state. In 1996 a Fianna Fáil deputy, Conor Lenihan, recalled his schooling in the 1960s: ‘History was a heady and potent thing then. In our school in Athlone there we...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title
• Copyright
• Contents
• Acknowledgements
• Abbreviations
• Introduction
• Part 1 Past and Present
• Part 2 Commemoration
• Part 3 Identities
• Part 4 Politics, 1885–1923
• Notes
• Select Bibliography