The difference between the two
The intellectual forebears of cognitive-behavioural therapies are found in the empirical-positivist tradition of American academic psychology rather than in the European philosophical attitudes that influenced Freud and many other psychodynamic therapists.
(McWilliams, 2011)
Cognitive behavioural therapy, developed from cognitive therapy by the American psychologist Albert Ellis and psychiatrist Aaron Beck, and behavioural therapy (developed mainly by American academics including Watson, Wolpe, Meichenbaum, Skinner and Bandura to name a few), has similar goals to psychoanalysis. This approach can help clients overcome difficulties, change their behaviour, and move forward in their lives. Many of the CBT treatments have clearly demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing symptoms; however, these are best suited to clients who are in need of short-term therapy, 15 to 20 weeks. CBT is best suited for clients whose problems stem from more immediate issues, and where inaccurate thinking can be changed or modified in order to affect behaviour. McWilliams (2011) contended that some clients also prefer a more focused and directed treatment, complete with homework assignments.
Psychoanalysis and psychodynamic therapies are more contemplative processes that can take many years; the goal is to uncover the underlying unconscious schemata. Unlike CBT, it involves an emphasis on childhood and past experiences, on exploration of the unconscious, and on wishes, dreams, and fantasies (McWilliams, 2011).
CBT is similar to psychoanalysis in that there is an exploration of patterns in the patientâs actions, thoughts, feelings, experiences and relationships (object relations). However, psychodynamic therapies differ in that they focus more on expression of emotion and the role of emotion in the clientâs life. The patientâs efforts to avoid certain topics (i.e. resistance) is also examined, as the fear of change is often a strong unconscious motive. In psychoanalysis there is also an emphasis on the therapeutic relationship (transference and working alliance) (McWilliams, 2011).
Moreover, many with a psychodynamic sensibility could not work within a manualised CBT framework; it is too left-brained for many therapists and clients (McWilliams, 2011). There is often a need to help the client achieve balance in their life through therapy. Where clients might be too logical, too linear or unable to be spontaneous, it is important to stimulate right-brain thinking, whereby clients can be more open emotionally, less linear, and more wholistic (Carnevale, 2015).
On a final note: What I personally love about working with images and the unconscious is that âaccidents can happenâ, as Case and Dalley (2014, p. 114) put it so discerningly. Working with a CBT approach can quickly achieve a directed and practical outcome. A great adjunct to art therapy. Within an art therapy approach however, you want to allow for âaccidentsâ, chaos, confusion and contradictions. often, it is exactly these moments when âaccidentsâ happen that can be eye-opening for our clients. When something totally unexpected comes up this can make a huge difference.
In the following chapters we will examine how both approaches, and a variety of others, can coexist harmoniously for better client outcomes.