1People Models and People Procedure
Getting the angels to win
Freud was famous for approaching social conflict as an expression of forces ādeeply ingrained within the individual. So deeply ingrained are they that it is common to refer to them as basic instincts. For Freud, human conflict fed on the innate aggressive drive lying within us allā (Schellenberg, 1996, p. 42). Pinker (2015) describes and rejects the same phenomenon as the Hydraulic Theory of Violence: that humans āharbour an inner drive toward aggression ⦠which builds up inside us and must periodically be dischargedā (p. 373).
Pinker also describes the fact that, in his view, humans get the better of this Hydraulic Theory in practice. He describes five inner demons that lead to conflict and four better angels that rescue us from it. Pinker explains the demonsā psychological systems that differ in their triggers: one is predatory or instrumental violence
deployed as a practical means to an end. Dominance is the urge for authority, prestige, glory, and power.⦠Revenge fuels the moralistic urge toward retribution.⦠Sadism is pleasure taken in anotherās suffering. And ideology is a shared belief system ⦠that justifies unlimited violence in pursuit of unlimited good.
(Pinker, 2015 p. 373)
However, there are also four better angels. āHumans ⦠come equipped with motives that can orient them away from [aggression] and toward cooperation and altruism. Empathy ⦠a moral sense ⦠the faculty of reasonā (Pinker, 2015, p. 373). In addition, humans have evolved to become less violent or aggressive. In other words, the angels win.
In this book, instead of these four angels, the same intent that propels forces for good to exist we will find as we follow the People Procedure and People Models that resolve conflict. The demons and angels here are quite different from Pinkerās but help us get to the same place: the angels win.
Key points in this chapter
Key points in this chapter are illustrated in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1Key points in this chapter
ā¢Getting the angels to win
ā¢Key points in this chapter
ā¢Business language and people language
ā¢People Models
ā¢Conflict
ā¢Other models of conflict resolution
ā¢Not fitting the traditional mould
ā¢People Procedure
ā¢Stopping the Department working on Sunday
ā¢The six different People Models
ā¢Values
ā¢Conclusion
ā¢Exercises
Business language and people language
The approach to conflict that I take in this book is based on personal experience. It posits a clear distinction between business thinking and people thinking. The former I learnt on my MBA at Cranfield School of Management, UK, and is what I call my ābusiness languageā. Prior to the MBA, I was an economist working in the Treasury in New Zealand and in the UK. However, I turned from that largely because I didnāt believe in it, especially the assumption of economic rationality. At Cranfield, I was looking to switch careers. There, I discovered Organizational Behaviour which was the subject I most wanted to read about and spend time on. Once I had figured this, I proceeded to switch careers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) doing my PhD in Organizational Studies. People thinking and people language came on my PhD where I was trained in what I call People Models as well as consulting by Professor Ed Schein, Professor Dick Beckhard, Professor Ed Nevis and Professor Lotte Bailyn. The PhD language won and, in this book, I contrast the two languages with an eye to the People Models winning the contest. Table 1.2 illustrates.
Table 1.2Demons and angels in this book
| Demons | Angels |
| ā¢Business focus exclusively or primarily ā¢Focus on power, resources, size to justify differential behaviour ā¢Try to trick the other person/organization ā¢āGet the better ofā the other person ā¢Act even if you donāt understand events | ā¢Focus on people and relationships ā¢Honourable behaviour and solution; an assumption of equality ā¢Confrontation and directness between people ā¢Understand the other person ā¢Psychological intelligence for what is going on; comprehension of events |
People Models
Conflict exists everywhere in organizations; from interpersonal dynamics to massive disagreements between organizations. I use People Models to look at conflict because people are usually standing out in the middle of it. There is no one right way to understand or to resolve it. Because of this, this book describes six ways (or People Models) not one way. One of these models might work for you or your organization and the others might not. Or, all might work.
Organizations are full of human beings functioning as human beings not business machines, so we need theories and models that are based on this fact not models that are technical or business-like. To understand conflict we need to understand why people do things. We need also frameworks that can assess conflict at an interpersonal level, as well as for a team, a Division or even the whole organization. These different levels are what this book is about.
Reasons to read this book:
ā¢It helps me deal with people issues.
ā¢It helps me understand the organization, team or individual.
ā¢It is constructive.
ā¢It is hands-on rather than being analytical.
ā¢It gives me six People Models ā tools I can apply.
ā¢It gives me examples of applying the People Models.
ā¢It gives me a People Procedure ā another tool.
ā¢It is psychological, but doesnāt require navel-gazing.
Conflict
Conflict exists when there is some argument, or disagreement between interested parties. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines it as āa serious disagreement or argument, typically a protracted oneā. It is noise in the system that we do not want. It is a difference that creates tension, not simply a difference per se. Conflict would arise only when there is an issue around positions; where there is some emotion or affect, some angst. It arises also when there is the need for a united front or view and this does not exist. Resolution means that the parties agree to proceed down a particular path. There neednāt be 100 per cent agreeme...