Part I
'Any colour you like' General discussions
Chapter 1
On the waxing and waning: a brief history of The Dark Side of the Moon
Russell Reising
The Goddess Astarte ⊠had more phases than the moon. She knew the dark side of the moon like the palm of her hand.
â Tom Robbins, Skinny Legs and All
What is this thing called The Dark Side of the Moon? And how did Pink Floyd readjust their controls, steering away from the sun and towards the dark side of the moon? How did they transport themselves from the lush submarine environments of âEchoesâ, the final cut on Meddle, to the airless aridity of lunar space? Surely, titles like âInterstellar Overdriveâ, âAstronomy Domineâ, and âSet the Controls for the Heart of the Sunâ, had already established the Floyd as spacey, otherworldly? The essays in this collection address this question in various ways, but I think fundamental questions will remain as to the albumâs significance, endurance, appeal, and essence. Is it a mere collection of fragments pieced together over a couple of years, or is it the apotheosis of album coherence and grand unification? Sound or light? Group effort or realization of individual genius? Morbid descent into lunacy or inspiring testament to transcendence and empathy? Adolescent psychodrama or mature ethical statement? Frenzied rush or mellow soporific? Frigidly esoteric, impersonal, and abstruse âspace musicâ or pumped-up blues funk? Despairing personal wail or bracing political statement? Erotic or violent or spiritual or philosophical or ethical or psychological or existential or solar or lunar or terrestrial? None of these either/or propositions does any justice to The Dark Side of the Moon, and the case is better understood as both both/and and either/or for each of these dichotomies. Like the Beatles in Revolver, Pink Floyd on The Dark Side of the Moon set their controls for the heart of the moon, settling for nothing less than a total apprehension of life and what it means to be human. And that means that no dividing lines are tidy; perhaps none is possible.
The Dark Side of the Moon, like many great artistic achievements, cannot be rendered as regular and predictable as the groove on vinyl, the magnetic clusters on a VHS tape, or the digital bits âburnedâ on a CD or DVD. In fact, the suite waxed and waned into and out of its 1973 realization in several distinct phases, many of which exist in easily found (and often downloaded) commercial audio and video forms. As David Gilmour noted in an interview with Chris Welch in 1973, âA lot of the material had already been performed when we recorded it, and usually we go into the studio and write and record at the same time. We started writing the basic idea ages ago, and it changed quite a lot. It was pretty rough to begin withâ (MacDonald, 1997, p. 300). Beginning with the tentative experiments we see and hear on Pink Floydâs Live in Pompeii video, through the Earls Court Pulse and Roger Watersâs In the Flesh audio and video documents, The Dark Side of the Moon has morphed through a series of phases as lively and fecund as anything found this side of the Sea of Fertility. My goal here is to organize and account for the significance and meaning of the phases The Dark Side of the Moon has passed through and to speculate on what they reveal about the overall impact of Pink Floydâs accomplishment. Since most of the other essays in this collection focus on the 1973 recorded version of The Dark Side of the Moon, approaching it from various cultural, musicological, and thematic perspectives, I will focus on the earlier and later performances of Pink Floydâs suite, including those performed after the official breakup of Pink Floyd. Of course, my commentary on these alternative moons carries with it my sense of the workâs essence.
One small step for Floyd
The video Pink Floyd Live at Pompeii (dir. Adrian Maben, 1972) contains the earliest recorded traces of Pink Floydâs work on The Dark Side of the Moon. In addition to documenting their performance amidst the ruins of the ancient stadium, the video captures the band members chatting, responding to interview questions, and, most importantly for our purposes, in the recording studio, experimenting on guitar, keyboard, and synthesizer riffs that will eventually become The Dark Side of the Moon. Beginning and ending musically with âEchoesâ, Live at Pompeii captures Pink Floyd at the apogee of their pre-Dark Side power, basking in their sense of significance and playing such early classics as âSet the Controls for the Heart of the Sunâ and âSaucerful of Secretsâ as well as much of Meddle, all for an audience of their sound and recording assistants, a film crew, and the breathless ghosts from the Vesuvian-scorched city. In an interview included as an extra feature of the âDirectorâs Cutâ DVD, Maben refers to his film as an âanti-Woodstockâ, indicating that he believed the audience-less quality of his Live at Pompeii broke away from the clichĂ©d concert film convention of focusing on audience reactions to ordinary stage performances. Interview footage incorporated into the film plumbs the groupâs and each individual memberâs identity, their sense of nostalgia for their earliest days together, and their sense of where theyâre heading musically. Roger Waters muses on the groupâs relationship to technology, and David Gilmour assures viewers that Pink Floyd isnât a âdrug orientated groupâ. At other times, the entire production suggests nothing more than a parodic Floydian revisitation of the Beatlesâ early stadium shows or Grand Funk Railroadâs sold-out stadium extravaganzas. Pink Floyd, however, play to an empty coliseum where, could their echoes still be heard, the agony of dying gladiators would have surpassed the din of screaming fans. The Beatles and the Monkees capered, as though joined at the hip, for cameras in movies and television shows. Pink Floyd, however, cavort among lava vents and bursts of steam from the still volatile topography and play their inimitable brand of psychedelic music to film footage of ruined Pompeii mosaics and exploding volcanoes. This is clearly rock documentary with a difference, filmed even before Pink Floyd themselves explode with the release of The Dark Side of the Moon.
Punctuating his presentation of Pink Floyd playing Pompeii, filmmaker Maben inserts several snippets of early Dark Side materials from Waters, Gilmour, and Wright, tucking them amid Floydâs performances, interviews, and endless shots of Nick Masonâs drumming and an equal number of their equipment, clearly stenciled âPINK FLOYD. LONDONâ. The film documents Pink Floyd playing and reproducing their unearthly sounds without any of the appurtenances of studio technology, and the version of âSaucerful of Secretsâ performed entirely live on guitar, drums, gong, grand piano, bass, and organ is a bracing reminder that Floyd, unlike many highly technologized groups with elaborate recording regimens, could always perform their work on stage.
Maben juxtaposes such exciting live footage with their preliminary work on materials that eventually become The Dark Side of the Moon, filming those scenes, quite understandably, under the artificial lighting and within the confines of recording studios, signaling, perhaps, a new departure in Floydâs musical and technological odyssey. A significant amount of the interview footage addresses the possibility that the band have become extensions of their equipment rather than the other way around. Waters comments: âitâs just a question of using the available tools when theyâre available. And more and more there are all kinds of electric goodies which are available for people like us to use.â Gilmour expands on Watersâs notion by adding, âI mean itâs all extensions of whatâs coming out of our heads. Youâve got to have it inside your head to be able to get it out at all anyway.â Then, during Roger Watersâs experimenting with a synthesized portion of âOn the Runâ, the first actual musical references to The Dark Side of the Moon, he comments, âitâs like saying give a man a Les Paul guitar, and he becomes Eric Clapton. Itâs not true. Give a man an amplifier and synthesizer and he doesnât become ⊠us.â Slightly later in the film, the camera lingers on Rich Wright playing some of the piano line to âUs and Themâ, with Wright and Waters then discussing precisely what it is that Rick is doing in that section.
The most remarkable and extended passages in which the film samples The Dark Side of the Moon occur in tandem with the groupâs commentary about their past and future as a group. The segment begins with Waters recording the bass line to âEclipseâ, a scene that fades into him also discussing the general economics of the rock music industry. The film then morphs into Nick Mason discussing the way in which Pink Floyd still, for many people, functions as a nostalgic reminder of âtheir childhood of 1968, the underground in London, free concerts in Hyde Park, and so onâ. David Gilmour then counters the common notion that Pink Floyd was a very âdrug-orientated groupâ by assuring the viewers, âOf course, weâre not. You can trust us.â Back to Nick Mason, once again, who notes that Pink Floyd is âdoing other things [now], cause [they] want to do other thingsâ. At that point, the film returns to Rick Wright recording the final piano lines to âUs and Themâ. Quite a remarkable retrospective portion of the film, and, quite significantly, Maben chooses to frame the most extended and serious commentary on the groupâs history and sense of themselves with their work on The Dark Side of the Moon. Just before the final two live numbers, Maben includes one more view of the Dark Side recording sessions, this time, David Gilmour recording two different guitar sections for âBrain Damageâ. Gilmour and Waters discuss whether the work is too âtoppyâ, Gilmour asks for a second take, and then, providing a coda for the Dark Side footage included in Pink Floyd: Live at Pompeii, Gilmour complains that he has to re-record another section by asking, âChrist, where would rock and roll be without feedback?â
It is in his framing of the âDirectorâs Cutâ of Live at Pompeii that director Maben most clearly accentuates his filmâs relationship with The Dark Side of the Moon. In fact, virtually every significant difference between the original VHS and the DVD version adds to the sense of Pink Floyd on the verge of the The Dark Side of the Moon. Even the blasted landscapes of Pompeii come more and more to resemble scenes from the dark side of the moon. Most notably, however, Maben frames his film with a sonic tribute to The Dark Side of the Moon, and the only sounds heard against a totally black screen at the very beginning and very ending of the film are a heartbeat and slow rhythmic breathing, clearly recalling the albumâs first two tracks, âSpeak to Meâ and âBreatheâ. In another framing device, Maben includes spacey shots of planets and various forms of cosmic debris flying through space, finally resolving into a close-up of the lunar surface and the earth emerging from behind the moon. In other words, Pink Floyd Live at Pompeii, The Directorâs Cut begins and ends with the earth being eclipsed by the moon.
For their pre-1973 live performances of what was then called Eclipse, Pink Floyd open with the signature heartbeat effects and some industrial rumblings before opening up to David Gilmour guitar strums and Roger Watersâs thunderous bass rumbles. Absent is Richard Wrightâs keyboard work that eventually comes to dominate the earliest minutes of The Dark Side of the Moon. Pink Floyd perform, and Gilmour certainly sings, âBreatheâ at what seems, in retrospect, glacial slowness, a pace relieved by the guitar-strum dominated transitional piece âOn the Runâ, which sounds more like a jazzy guitar jam, or like something reminiscent of âInterstellar Overdriveâ. Gilmourâs guitar work is unrelated to the heavily synthesized work Wright contributed to the recorded version. In 1972, however, the keyboardist limits his input to a very jazzy piano accompaniment punctuating Gilmourâs frenetic strums, while Waters and Nick Mason set down a rapid, yet conventional beat, with Masonâs few flourishes coming on the high-hat cymbals. As the suite moves towards âTimeâ (without any of the airplane crash effects or jangling clock sounds!), Wright contributes more synthesized machine-like effects, all of which fade out of audibility, giving way to Masonâs roto-tom percussive introduction to âTimeâ, when Gilmourâs and Wrightâs playing builds up to the vocals. Mason complicates his roto-tom work, by adding a backbeat that industrializes the opening bars of his drumming. Floyd protract the instrumental introduction to âTimeâ, but the piece never quite escalates in intensity of foreboding, and Gilmour and Waters sing a vocal duet that lumbers out in mournful, nearly lugubrious, strains. The pace of these early versions shocks the listener used to the album and subsequent performance versions, a pace that Gilmourâs guitar solo reproduces. Most of the notes are there, as is the general trajectory of the solo, but Gilmour slurs most of his playing, and the pace sounds like a 45rpm record played at 33â
rpms. Gilmour and Waters achieve interesting vocal effects, with one frequently either singing slightly behind the other or adding wordless harmony to the primary vocal line. The reprise of âBreatheâ, with Gilmourâs âHome, home againâ line, maintains this pace before easing into what constitutes one of the most remarkable differences between these preliminary versions and the 1973 recorded piece.
As the âBreatheâ reprise fades out, Wright fades in playing what can only be described as funereal church music with pipe organ strains accentuated by rolling bass. In the background of what was then called âthe mortality pieceâ, Waters chants in prayerful tones and inserts televangelistic solicitations, before actually reciting âThe Lordâs Prayerâ to Wrightâs organ work. As he concludes the so-called mortality section, Wrightâs playing resembles Keith Jarrettâs work on Hymns and Spheres, surging with spiritual atmospherics and intricate keyboard work. Prior to the 1973 recording, no Clare Torry or any other female vocal work eases the performance out of âTimeâ and into the syncopated coin sounds introducing âMoneyâ, with rhythmic complexity added by a tambourine. Again, the vocal presentation proceeds in carefully modulated and very slow pace until Wright sets out on a solo that will eventually be replaced by Dick Parry on the saxophone. Here also, Gilmourâs guitar solo, which bursts out on the record and in post-1973 concert performances, eases out of Wrightâs keyboard work. Gilmour eventually does rise to some soaring intensity near the end of the solo and approximates the jazzy rendition he played live, up to and including the Pulse performance. These 1972 performances already reveal a Pink Floyd experimenting with their opus. In the Sapporo, Japan versions, they eliminate the final vocal verse of âMoneyâ, and the conclusion of Gilmourâs solo more or less coincides with the end of the song. In one of the London shows, however, the structure of âMoneyâ, and the segue from âMoneyâ into âUs and Themâ have already taken on the colouring and embellishments of the recorded version.
âUs and Themâ begins with Gilmour playing more than he will by 1973, and both Gilmour and Waters provide vocal effects that will be replaced by more of Wrightâs keyboards and synthesizers. It is in the bridge sections of âUs and Themâ that the suite approaches the edge and intensity of the recorded performance. Gilmour and Watersâs voices, as well as the entire instrumentation, surge out of the mellow vocals and keyboard melody with a sense of uncontrollable rage and bitterness. In these moments, we can hear the glimmerings of the more symphonic presentation that will come to define âUs and Themâ from 1973 onward.
At this point, Pink Floyd seems to have begun realizing the potential of the manic juxtapositions th...