Composition and Publication
In March 1817 S. took up residence in Albion House, Great Marlow, Buckinghamshire where he lived until February 1818 with Mary (his wife since the previous December), their one-year-old son William and, from her birth on 2 September, their daughter Clara. For most of this period Maryâs step-sister Clare Clairmont and Alba (later Allegra), Clareâs infant child by Byron, also made part of the household. Thomas Love Peacock was a close neighbour and regular visitor. Leigh Hunt and his family stayed at Albion House from 10 April until 25 June, Hunt continuing to act as editor of the liberal weekly The Examiner during this time. From the home of Peacock and his mother, where the Shelleys were guests while preparing to enter their own, Mary had written on 2 March to Hunt: Our house is very political as well as poetical and I hope you will acquire a fresh spirit for both when you come hereâ (Mary L i 29). It was among this circle of friends and working writers and in an atmosphere of anxious concern over public affairs, widely perceived to be in crisis over the question of parliamentary reform, that the epic romance L&C was composed in draft through the spring, summer and early autumn. Finished, transcribed, and seen through the press by about mid-November, it was on sale at the beginning of December. This is not a long period of time to spend on a poem of its length (4818 lines) and claims to high seriousness of purpose; to bring it to completion strenuous effort had to be kept up right through a season of intense imaginative creation which was, moreover, continually marked by the stress of personal adversity. Both S.âs first wife Harriet and Maryâs half-sister Fanny had committed suicide the previous autumn. At the end of March S. was deprived as morally unfit of the custody of the two children of his first marriage, while in late June/early July his exertions were clouded with foreboding by a recurrence of what were feared to be consumptive symptoms (L&C lines 89-90 and note). Replying on 11 December to a letter from his father-in-law Godwin, to whom a copy of L&C had been sent as soon as printing was finished, and who had returned âadmonitionsâ and âcensuresâ, S. recalled the apprehensions he had experienced during the writing:
The Poem was produced by a series of thoughts which filled my mind with an unbounded & sustained enthusiasm. I felt the precariousness of my life, & I engaged in this task resolved to leave some record of myself. Much of what the volume contains was written with the same feeling, as real, though not so prophetic, as the communications of a dying man. I never presumed indeed to consider it anything approaching to faultless, but when 1 considered contemporary productions of the same apparent pretensions, I will own that I was filled with confidence. (L i 577)
The personal urgency and the writerâs self-assurance were attended by keen anxiety that L&C, a heroic poem boldly assuming a prophetic stance at a moment of national emergency, should attract the readers that S.âs earlier works had failed to find: âI have the fairest chance of the public approaching my work with unbiassed and unperverted feeling; the fruit of reputation (and you know for what purposes I value it) is within my reachâ, he wrote to his publisher Charles Oilier in December (L i 580). Another circumstance must have further sharpened the urgency with which he wrote. S.âs cousin Thomas Medwin remembered: âShelley told me that he and Keats had mutually agreed, in the same given time, (six months each,) to write a long poem, and that the Endymion, and Revolt of Islam [as Laon and Cythna was entitled after being withdrawn and reissued: see below p. 16] were the fruits of this rivalryâ (Medwin (1913) 178-9). It may be in private acknowledgement of this friendly competition with Keats â it is surely out of the anxiety expressed to Oilier and Godwin â that, in the Preface to L&C, S. duly forewarns his readers that the 300-page octavo volume he is introducing had been written rapidly: The Poem now presented to the Public occupied little more than six months in the compositionâ; a few lines later he varies the time slightly: âthe mere composition occupied no more than six monthsâ. When considered together with two other pieces of evidence, S.âs statement appears to fix the dates of this six-month period quite precisely. Mary entered in her jnl for 29 September 1817: âS. finishes his poem and goes up to town with Clare Teusday [sic] 23â (Mary Jnl i 180). The next day S. wrote from Leigh Huntâs in Paddington to Byron in Venice: âI have completed a poem which, when it is finished, though I do not tax your patience to read it, I will send youâ (I i 557). Taking the discrepancy in the Preface between âlittle more thanâ and âno more thanâ as an indication that S. is not counting to the day â and allowing, on the more generous of his calculations, perhaps a week or so beyond six months â a date around the middle of March 1817 would be the earliest that he could have begun to write the poem. Composition would then have started within a few days of the Shelleysâ taking possession of Albion House on 18 March (Mary Jnl i 166).
Although the period during which the poem was written can be, and has traditionally been, thus closely determined, some notations in Nbk 2, apparently an early calendar of composition, need also to be considered. On the first complete page of the nbk, which contains drafts for L&C Cantos I and II, S. wrote in a vertical column: âApril 4-May-June-July-August 4â. 4 August 1817 would be his twenty-fifth birthday, and it may be that at this early stage he aimed to complete the poem which he described in the Preface as âmy first serious appeal to the Publicâ on that anniversary. Above and to the right of the column of months a series of figures begins with 5 and descends by doubling the figure until the number 320 is reached opposite the centre of the column of months. The figure 320 is multiplied, above and to the left of the dates, by 9 (the number of lines in the Spenserian stanza in which the poem is written) to give the total 2880; while below this figure the number 120, the approximate number of days in the 4 April-4 August span, is enclosed in a box. Other faint calculations in pencil would indicate that S. returned to this page at points later in the composition to record his progress. From these dates and figures it could be conjectured that S. originally, or at some early stage, planned that L&C should comprise 320 Spenserian stanzas and be finished on his twenty-fifth birthday. The conjecture seems to be supported by a letter addressed to Leigh Hunt in London written on the eve of that birthday, 3 August, and which contains â perhaps prompted by the date â the only reference in S/s surviving correspondence to L&C in the course of its composition: âI have arrived at the 380th stanza of my Poemâ (L i 551). On the hypothesis of 320 projected stanzas L&C would have grown as it was written well beyond the original estimate to its final length (including the Dedication) of 525 stanzas...