Chapter 1
HOW TO BEGIN
Where to start
Find your own beginning | A book can have only one beginning but campaigns can have many different beginnings. First you need to find your own beginning, and that depends on where you are at: |
⢠If you know your issue but you don't know exactly what you want to achieve, begin by defining your objective (see Chapter 4, āambition boxā)
⢠If you need to campaign because you are faced with a known specific problem, and that tells you your objective but you don't know how to get that changed, then begin with the campaign motivation sequence (this chapter)
⢠If you have a concern but don't know how the issue works ā the forces and processes behind the problem ā then start with issue mapping and gathering intelligence (Chapter 3)
⢠If you already run a campaign and feel a need to change strategy or tactics, try looking at factors such as resources and assets (Chapter 8)
⢠If you have an organization which thinks it might like to campaign but is not sure, then step back and examine the bigger picture (Chapter 11), and try locating your approach in the ambition box.
See also the campaign planning star in Chapter 4, which illustrates factors needed in generating a campaign plan and proposition.
What communication is
The two words āinformationā and ācommunicationā are often used interchangeably, but they signify quite different things. Information is giving out; communication is getting through.
Sidney J. Harris, American journalist and author
Successful communication needs to be two-way | Good communication isn't noticed. It's like good design: we only notice bad design. The London Underground map is often cited as a classic. We don't notice it because it fits its purpose so well (use it to walk around London, and you find it bears little resemblance to ārealityā). |
Forget old saws such as āgetting your message acrossā. Campaigners who focus on āsending messagesā will never succeed: they will persuade no-one but themselves. Successful communication needs to be two-way: more telephone than megaphone, with the active involvement of both parties.
Real communication, it has been said,1 is rare and involves āthe transferring of an idea from the mind of the sender to the mind of the receiverā.
If someone does not want to receive your message, they won't. Would-be communicators therefore need to understand the motivations of their audience.
All too often, communication is treated as a technical, one-way process beautifully designed to reflect the views of the sender, unsullied by the need to be effective with the receiver.
āDelivering messagesā, āsending informationā, ātargeting advertisingā: it becomes like targeting missiles ā fire and forget ā except that forgetting is the last thing that should be happening. Campaigners should spend at least as much time listening to the public and the target, allies and opponents they seek to influence as they spend in working on communications back in the office.
Figure 1.1 Basic model of communications
Figure 1.2 Communication model incorporating feedback
The word āaudienceā wrongly implies that receivers are passive. A dialogue is usually best, and if that's impossible, repetition may succeed in āreachingā the audience.
A popular basic model of communications is illustrated in Figure 1.1.
We all know that serious misunderstandings can occur even in one-to-one communication. Introduce a third party ā such as a newspaper or radio station and its journalists' and volume may increase but noise gets into the channel because of journalistsā interpretations, or pollution by the thousands of other messages to which we are exposed each day.2
To improve communication, obtain feedback, whether volunteered or obtained through qualitative research.
Des Wilson, founder of Shelter, says: āRemember, the bigger the audience, the simpler the messageā.3 So with public media, messages need to become simpler, compared to the complexities you can deal with in conversations at home or in the office.
Figure 1.3 Example of a fire safety notice
If you find a fire
The short words are best, and the old words are the best of all.
Sir Winston Churchill
Design communications to get a result | Motivational communication follows some well-established sequences, developed and refined by generations of salespeople. A useful version for campaigns is: |
awareness > alignment > engagement > action.
Take the example of a fire safety notice that you might find in a hotel.
These notices keep it simple. They look something like the example shown in Figure 1.3.
At first sight, constructing this message seems easy but, in fact, it is carefully designed. It instructs to raise the alarm first ā this is in the best interests of the hotel residents. It doesn't say ācall the fire brigadeā ā which might be in the best financial interests of the hotel owner, but which could mean searching for a phone in smoke-filled corridors. It puts lives over property. Then it says to go to the place of safety ā and only then call the fire brigade.
So it's communication with a purpose (here = save lives). You need to know why you are trying to communicate, what the objective is in terms of an action, what you want someone to do, before you can communicate effectively.
Also, the sign is very simple and it instructs rather than offering a discussion, which would not be appropriate in an emergency. It is unambiguous. Lastly, it follows the sequence shown in Table 1.1:
Awareness establishes the subject. Alignment establishes that it is relevant to everyone. Engagement is an appeal to join in ā and requires a commonly available mechanism (see Chapter 2). The action is what is needed. Omit or reorder any of these steps and problems result.
Table 1.1 Sequence followed by fire safety notice
| If you find a fire | Awareness |
| We are all in danger | Alignment |
| Lets go this way | Engagement |
| We are leaving | Action |
Figure 1.4 Alternative fire safety notice
If all our communication was so simple, we'd all be more effective. Yet all too often our communication is not like this but more like the alternative fire sign shown in Figure 1.4.
This addresses the same subject: it, too, is about fire. It's āon messageā. But it is not very clear and would probably lead to people frying in their rooms. It is a message about an issue, not communication designed to get a result in terms of a specific action. It invites āeducationā and ānetworkingā: things that involve reflection and discussion, and are open to interpretation.
This can occur when:
⢠an internal agenda is transmitted to the outside world ā easily done if exhausted by getting it through the system;
⢠a policy or plan is transmitted as a āmessageā;
⢠everyone has a say and the message mentions every important issue;
⢠there is an attempt to educate rather than to motivate.
Campaign sequence
Roll your campaign out like an unfolding story | Many of the best campaigns are planned as a simple chronology of events. Often there are only one or two fixed dates and the rest is a chain of objectives that need to be reached, like climbing from one level to another or stepping from one stone to the next, with no firm way of predicting just when that will occur. |
Plan backwards from the call to action. That should be either a fixed date (such as an event) or a date that can be estimated sufficiently well to have all the necessary communications, assets and capabilities in place when it arrives. The possible start date is then generated by adding together the critical time periods ne...