II
Womenâs Voices
5
A Protestant in Foreign Catholic and Muslim Spaces: The Turkish Embassy Letters of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu
Precious McKenzie
LADY MARY WORTLEY Montagu (1689â1762) is best remembered for her Embassy Letters (1763), epistles composed during her yearlong residence in the Ottoman Empire. Her letters, published only after her death and then against the wishes of her daughter, reveal the political preoccupations of a notable, aristocratic woman and expand upon our own framework of eighteenth-century politics and power. Many scholars have read Montaguâs letters through the lens of eighteenth-century gender dynamics. This article however reexamines Montaguâs letters and expands the context of her writing. I argue Montagu navigates a continent ravished by war and that she confronts deep-rooted European fears about the Muslim Other. Such an analysis is significant in that the battles and redrawn boundaries of the Habsburg and Ottoman Empiresâof which Montagu travelsâwould continue to have a long-lasting impact on the peace and stability of the region. Historians have argued the events that caused World War I had their genesis in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Battles in the region included the War of Spanish Succession (1700â1715), the War of Austrian Succession (1740â1748, known in England as âKing Georgeâs Warâ), the Russo-Turkish War (1877â1878) and the Balkan Wars (1912â1913). When Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, was assassinated by Serbian forces (June 1914), the numerous battles and long-standing tangled alliances between the European nations were tested and caused the outbreak of World War I. Montaguâs political position and her observations about the region during the eighteenth century foreshadow growing tension in the region; tension that her husband, traveling to the Ottoman Empire as a diplomat, could not successfully mend.
Montaguâs Early Years
When Mary Pierrepont (later Lady Mary Wortley Montagu) was just fourteen years old, her father, Lord Dorchester, introduced her to the Kit-Cat Club, a club composed of men of wit who were aligned with the Whig Party. There the members toasted to her beauty and intelligence.1 She began to circulate in society and make intimate friendships with writers, politicians, and members of royalty. Her most notable early friendships include Addison and Steele. More than just a celebrated beauty, young Lady Mary spent hours reading books in her fatherâs library. By the time she was toasted by the Kit-Cat Club, she had already read âDryden, Fletcher, Congreve, Molière, and Corneilleâ and French romances.2 She taught herself Latin and Greek. She enjoyed writing. Before her marriage to Edward Wortley Montagu, she wrote many pieces which she circulated amongst her friends. Emulating the English and French romance traditions, her earliest works dealt with young women and marriage.3 Throughout her works, Isobel Grundy notes, Montaguâs âworking model of female goodness is one of honour and heroism, not of submissiveness and conformity.â4
In 1703 or 1704, fourteen-year-old Lady Mary began a correspondence with a man eleven years her senior, Edward Wortley Montagu, under the guise that she was writing to Wortleyâs sister. Their correspondence, which she did her best to hide from her father, lasted until their marriage in 1712.5 She eloped with Wortley, and because of this, was shunned by her father, and Wortley was denied a dowry for his new bride. Her father did not believe that Wortley was up to par with his own familyâs fortunes. Wortley did, however, travel in impressive circles. He attended Trinity College, Cambridge. He was close friends with Addison and Steele and acted, with Addison, as godfather to Steeleâs daughter.6 Wortley was also a Whig and a Member of Parliament. He was hardworking, prudent with his money, and somber.
In July 1716, King George I appointed Wortley as âHis Majestyâs Ambassador at the Ottoman Porte.â7 But, before this appointment, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu was already a published author. In 1714, one of her essays appeared in the Spectator.8 Then in 1716, shortly before she left for the Ottoman Empire, several of her poems were published, although she did not authorize publication. The Town Eclogues, written with Pope and Gay, was published in 1716, and placed her in âfirst-rate literary companyâ and earned her the reputation of a female wit.9 But she is best remembered for her Embassy Letters, which chronicle her experiences far from England.
The Epistolary Tradition
Traveling through Europe and the Ottoman Empire in 1716â1718 as a diplomatâs wife, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu analyzes public and private spaces in relation to her experiences as a woman both in England and abroad.10 Wortley was sent to the Ottoman Empire with a mission to arrange a peace treaty involving the Ottoman Empire and the European powers, specifically the Habsburgs and the British. While Wortley tended to political business, Montagu visited ancient ruins, gardens, churches, mosques, and the homes of diplomats and royalty. Montagu openly admired life in the Ottoman Empire, and in fact, her husband would later lose his post as ambassador because it was thought that he was too sympathetic to the Ottomans.11 This article argues that in her letters to friends and family members, Montagu weighs the values of Muslim and Christian customs. As she struggles to convince her European readers of the propriety of the Ottoman hammams (Turkish baths), Montagu operates in a periphery realm for she is neither a native nor a colonizer. Montagu, as the civilized Englishwoman, is often uncertain as to the extent to which she should adopt the Ottoman lifestyle, although she admires its women and its traditions.12 Even in her uncertainty, Montagu provides her contemporaries with valuable cultural commentary on life beyond Protestant England. This is a significant political and cultural contribution that Montagu made. Because of the Turkish Siege of Vienna (1683), Christian Europeans mistrusted Muslim Ottomans. Austria was also trying to reassert itself as a major figure in the region, capable of defending its borders from the Ottoman Empire and Russia. Many Christians perceived the Ottomans as bloodthirsty heathens set out to conquer and destroy all of Christendom. Montagu sets out to understand Ottoman culture and break down prejudice aimed at Muslim Ottomans.
As Montagu travels east from Bohemia and into the Ottoman Empire, the society and politics she encounters affect her rhetoric. While in the Kingdom of Bohemia, she writes to her sister, Lady Mar. Montagu, laments the less than luxurious accommodations, and reports on Bohemiaâs natural gifts such as the abundance of delicious wild fowl. Her rhetoric implies that monarchs should protect the land and its people. Montagu finds beauty in the pastoral landscape. Likewise, eighteenth-century European cities she visits are paradoxes of luxuriousness and moral decrepitude. The city space is a public arena where Montagu attends one lavish dinner party after another. Frequently Montagu, as the wife of a diplomat, enters into the most private chambers of the political ĂŠlite of Europe and the Ottoman Empire. She wittily compares English aristocrats to the foreign aristocrats she encounters on her travels. I argue that Montaguâs insights on public and private spaces are deliberately constructed; Montagu is a skilled author, not simply a friendly, familial correspondent as her genre choiceâthe letterâmight suggest. She utilizes the epistolary genre in order to subtly critique English politics. However, Montagu herself would demurely denounce most of the political implications which appeared in her letters. For example, during a conversation with an old priest who came to visit her, the priest witnessed Montagu folding a rather large letter to her daughter. The priest commented on Montaguâs âgreat deal of Business.â She coyly replied, âI had done no business at all; I had only wrote to my Daughter on Family affairs or such trifles as make up Womenâs Conversation.â13
As Montagu no doubt realized, letters precariously occupy both private and public space. Deborah Kaplan acknowledges the letterâs intimate nature which enables a writer to voice, âcultural identifications shared by letter writer and reader.â14 The transmission of family affairs such as the discussion of land, inheritance, social engagements or marriage agreements is anything but trifling for a powerful aristocratic family such as Montaguâs. She establishes her political affiliation through her letters, thereby positioning herself and her family securely within the English ruling class, as intimates of King George I.15 Considering that Montagu organized the Turkish Embassy Letters after her return from the Ottoman Empire and that she ordered them published only after her death further suggests she intended a sociopolitical message for her eighteenth-century readers. The posthumous publication of the letters belies Montaguâs anxieties about weakening her status in society or causing public scandal by being âunladylikeâ because she wrote;16 it was commonly thought a woman of quality âcould have no acquaintance with a booksellerâthat is to say, a publisherâexcept as a purchaser of his wares.â17
Simone de Beauvoir analyzes the paradox of womenâs cultural negotiations which better contextualizes Montaguâs letters in the feminist literary tradition. De Beauvoir maintains that âwomen band together in order to establish a counter-universe, but they always set it up within the frame of the masculine universe.â18 Montagu is no exception to de Beauvoirâs theory. In the Embassy collection, twelve of the fifteen recipients are women. Her travelerâs position is influenced by her position as a woman within patriarchal English society. Montagu buries social and political messages in the letters to her âcounter-universeâ of female readers with humor, scandal, gossip, and other such trifles.19
If Montagu had anxiety over having her poems or essays published, society perceived letter writing as an appropriate form of writing for an eighteenth-century lady. Groups of female friends and family members often gathered together to read and discuss letters. Letters by ladies were circulated but never published for the general public. The events Montagu reports in her letters and the information in general found in typical eighteenth-century letters were âthe means to the social and moral knowledge of others.â20 When Montagu describes her eastern travels she also transmits valuable knowledge about this exotic world to her more confined female readers at home. Letters were seen as the âmost direct, sincere, and transparent form of written communicationâ and as also âthe most playful and potentially deceptive of forms.â21
Although it is known that Montagu drew on her own, actual letters for the Embassy collection, Cynthia Lowenthal finds that âevidence indicates that she edited out the personal references and rearranged information: descriptions sent to one correspondent, for example, appear in the albums to have been sent to another.â22 Because of this, the Embassy Letters should be analyzed as a âmost polished and self-conscious epistolary performanceâ a document deliberately shaped, edited, and fine-tuned for nuance and subtlety.â23 The travel letters written to her friends provide âa pretext for distancingâ herself from âthe social institutionsâ of which she belongs.24 Montagu assumes the role of reporter or surveyorâwith a touch of satirist tossed in for good measure. By participating in such discourse, Montagu advocates for the reformation of European and, more specifically, Catholic political policy regarding Englandâs foreign alliances. The epistolary form is Montaguâs conscious choice to adhere to her societyâs expectations of women as polite letter writers rather than as professional authors or politicians.
Montagu selects her recipients based on the social or political message she wants to discuss. Montaguâs recipients in the Embassy collection, such as Lady Mar, Lady Rich, and Lady Bristol, reflect her aware...