âbig Dâ development [is] defined as a post-second world war project of intervention in the âthird worldâ that emerged in the context of decolonization and the cold war, and âlittle dâ development or the development of capitalism as a geographically uneven, profoundly contradictory set of historical processes.
(cited by Urban et al., 2011: 6â7; Urban & Nordensvärd, 2013: 10)
There are various approaches to Western development thinking, including rights-based approaches, which focus on human rights and/or increasing the voice of marginalised groups (Mohan & Holland, 2001; Hickey & Mohan, 2005; Urban et al., 2011). There are also human development approaches, which incorporate broader development objectives than economic ones and aim to expand human choices and strengthen human capabilities related to education, health, income and gender ( Jolly, 2003; Urban et al., 2011). There are also approaches that are based on concerns for the poorest âbottom billionâ (Collier, 2007; Urban et al., 2011). There are further approaches that come from different disciplines such as anthropology, economics and political science, and different perspectives such as gender, globalisation and the environment. In other parts of the world, such as China, different streams of non-Western development thinking prevail which are more related to these countriesâ own experiences, culture and philosophy of development (Urban et al., 2011; Urban & Nordensvärd, 2013).
While humans have been concerned about economic development and social transformation for centuries, the concept of international development and development studies as a discipline is reported to have emerged in the late 1940s, 1950s and early 1960s. Development studies began as a post-Second World War project in support of poorer âdeveloping countriesâ. âDevelopmentâ was driven by so-called developed Western/Northern countries. âDevelopmentâ has often been accused of paternalism and trusteeship (Cowen & Shenton, 1996; Urban et al., 2011). Back in the 1950s, development policy was dominated by the goal of achieving modernity, by an optimist worldview, by expecting the state to play an active, positive role and by focussing on national development (Humphrey, 2007; Urban et al., 2011; Urban & Nordensvärd, 2013).
While development studies started with optimism after the Second World War, the concept of development, and development studies as a discipline, has endured criticism for many years (Urban et al., 2011). This is linked to ongoing problems such as widespread poverty in many parts of the world; global neoliberalism, which sees states as part of the problem rather than part of the solution (Humphrey, 2007); as well as the occurrence of various transboundary phenomena. Challenges like the global financial crisis, terrorism and large-scale environmental problems, such as climate change and natural resource depletion, are seen to require international and multilateral solutions (Urban et al., 2011). One other major shift in development policy is due to the rise of emerging economies like China, India, Brazil, South Africa and states of the Middle East (Urban et al., 2011). Their rise questions dominant âWesternâ approaches to development (Humphrey, 2007). Unfortunately, the optimism of earlier decades has been replaced by some pessimism, including development being declared dead in the 1990s by both the political right and the political left (Hart, 2001; Urban et al., 2011). Fifteen years later, Rist argued that development as practised and imposed by the West was âtoxicâ (Rist, 2007; Urban et al., 2011; Urban & Nordensvärd, 2013).
The notion of âreimagining developmentâ therefore prevails within the discipline of development studies, with new thinking of what development policy and practice means today, who is driving it and for whom, particularly in view of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be achieved by 2030. In the field of energy and development, the most important initiatives are SDG 7 on sustainable energy and the UN energy access initiative SE4All that provides positive and forward-looking pathways to achieving access to sustainable energy for everyone worldwide to enable sustainable development (SE4All, 2014).
Please note: The terms âdevelopingâ country and âdevelopedâ country are used in line with international practice. Nevertheless, the author acknowledges the following: First, there is a wide range of so-called developing countries, ranging from the least developed countries to low-income countries, lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries and emerging economies. Some of these terms overlap. For example, China is an e...