CHAPTER
| 1 | Models of and approaches to Early Years and primary English |
Introduction
In this chapter I take the term âmodelâ to refer to a set of principles and beliefs which guide what we do day by day. Whenever teachers plan a lesson, that plan will be influenced by the principles and beliefs they carry with them. When we think about models of English teaching we can learn from what writers have said in the past. So this chapter starts in Section 1, Extract 1, with John Dixonâs particularly clear and helpful analysis. His book Growth Through English has informed approaches to English lessons on both sides of the Atlantic since it was first published in 1967. It was one outcome of the lectures, talks and fruitful interactions between British and American delegates at a conference in America known as the Dartmouth Seminar, which had taken place the previous year. He identifies three models â a âskillsâ model, a âcultural heritageâ model and a âpersonal growthâ model. Each model emphasises a different element of the English curriculum: the debate about how to combine these elements into a single coherent model continues.
But what about childrenâs learning and experience in early childhood before they come to school? In Section 2, approaches valuing the important role of play in early childhood are considered. James Brittonâs inspirational article âThe role of fantasyâ, Extract 2, makes the important link between childrenâs play in their earliest years and their later enjoyment of all things cultural including art, music and literature. Stories â those that children read, write for themselves or have read to them â as well as poems, plays and improvisations are near the centre of the English curriculum for all age groups. Brittonâs link between early play and this later learning and enjoyment is an important one for those who teach and those who learn in English lessons.
What is at the very heart of English? In Section 3, Extract 3, Britton and Newsome identify what they believe to be at the centre of English lessons for all age groups. They begin by drawing attention to the inner representation of the world, or âworld pictureâ, we all carry around with us. We can use this âworld pictureâ to operate as âparticipantsâ in the real world; simple examples here would be getting from place to place on a journey or making a cake. This way of using our âworld pictureâ is crucial for managing everyday activities and is also important in most curriculum subjects. However, we can use this inner representation of the world in a different way as âspectatorsâ in activities involving reflecting, improvising and musing on this âworld pictureâ. These activities take place when we write, when we talk to others and when we read all kinds of literature. For Britton and Newsome, activities and their associated language in the âspectator roleâ are the essence of English lessons. Still in Section 3, Extract 4, Marian Whitehead argues convincingly for the value to children of becoming âspectators of fictionâ and points to the likely cumulative benefits to the imagination of listening to and reading stories and rhymes. But, of course, the cultural context in which children live and learn is constantly changing and the range of media and texts to choose from is wider and richer than was the case when Dixon and Britton were writing; the inspiration innovative texts and new media encourage are very much part of Teresa Creminâs vision of creative English teaching explored in Extract 5 in Section 4. New texts and constantly developing media are a theme throughout the book and particularly in Chapter 6 âThe rich landscape of childrenâs literatureâ.
Few teachers or those writing about English teaching today would propose exclusively following one of Dixonâs models â âskillsâ, â cultural heritageâ or even âpersonal growthâ â although they might lean towards one of them. Section 4 considers new approaches which are united by a belief that it is a childâs creativity and urge to make sense and learn that should be nurtured and developed. For the age groups at the heart of this book, a âcreativeâ approach is desirable across the curriculum. Here, though, the extract I have chosen, from Teaching English Creatively, considers the implication of a âcreativeâ approach in English lessons. The editor and contributor to the book, Teresa Cremin, integrates what many would feel is the best from each of the Dixon models. She teases out those elements in the English curriculum that require the teaching and learning of skills, although for her the mastery of spelling, punctuation and grammar and the language knowledge this entails involves more than drills and mechanical learning. The emphasis she and other leading writers from this generation place on quality texts of all kinds and on the wider media gathers in the strengths of the âcultural heritageâ model. However, the newer version is richer and includes digital texts and quality books from across the world. Creminâs âcreativityâ model with its emphasis on childrenâs active exploring of ideas and their imaginative engagement with literature and their own talk and writing is perhaps closest to the âpersonal growthâ model. Without referring to Dixonâs writing directly, it also helps us address some of the possible limitations of this model, limitations of which Dixon is himself aware.
The ideas and insights in the extracts in this chapter will, I believe, help teachers to reflect on current debates about the English curriculum, whether they work in an Early Years or a primary classroom.
Section 1: Models of English teaching
Extract 1
Source
Dixon, J. (1975, 3rd edn) Growth Through English: Set in the Perspective of the Seventies. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the National Association for the Teaching English, 3â4, 7, 13.
This extract is taken from the third edition of John Dixonâs seminal work published in 1975. The first edition, published in 1967, was an outcome of a seminar held in Dartmouth, Alabama in the previous year. Here teachers and academics from Britain and North America worked to find a way of defining what is meant when we refer to âEnglishâ as a classroom subject. John Dixon captures the complexity of this task: âEnglish is a quicksilver among metals â mobile, living and elusive. Its conflicting emphases challenge us today to look for a new coherent definition.â Three models were identified by the participants in the seminar. First, a âskillsâ model, which emphasises the acquisition of all those things needed to read, write and spell. The problem here was to do with what a narrow interpretation left out. The second model, the âcultural heritageâ model, saw a main contribution of the English lesson as the passing on of a canon of great literature to successive generations, a canon which would provide models for childrenâs own writing. Again, the main problem was with an over-emphasis on one aspect of English, as Dixon explains in the extract before homing in on the âpersonal growthâ model he favours.
Comment
Dixon sets his three models of English in an historical dimension. By this I mean that he associates the models in their more rigorous form with particular historical and social contexts. The âskillsâ model was taken up in the elementary schools established in significant numbers after the 1870 Education Reform Act where becoming literate was the priority and the approach tended to be mechanistic. Large classes sat formally at desks and carried out drills and tasks. The âcultural heritageâ model notably held sway in many of the state grammar schools established by the 1944 Education Act: a canon of what were thought to be the finest literary texts dominated English lessons. These two approaches limited childrenâs experience in English lessons, in one case by over-emphasising skills and in the other by being restricted to a relatively narrow range of texts. Dixon favours a model, the âpersonal growthâ model, that puts children at the centre of their learning in English lessons. At the heart of this approach is the childrenâs response to literature and the organisation of their thoughts, ideas and feelings in talk and writing. The model could inform teaching of all age phases and was very much in the progressive spirit of the Plowden Report (1967). Current approaches, in the UK at least, as we shall see later when considering Creminâs âcreativeâ approach to English, are often founded on the âpersonal growthâ model. But, as is nearly always the case with models and approaches, the âpersonal growthâ model has been criticised. Some, for example Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen, have considered that Dixon, along with others sympathetic to what have been termed âreader-response theoriesâ, moved too far in accepting the validity of childrenâs subjective understanding of texts, even when these understandings were not compatible with the authorâs intentions (Kress and van Leeuwen, 1996: 26â7). Reader-response theory will be considered in Chapter 6, âThe rich landscape of childrenâs literatureâ. On reflecting on his earlier views, Dixon himself considered that participant kinds of language, language to do with operating in the real world rather than the world of the imagination, in English lessons were at risk of being neglected if the âpersonal growthâ model was followed to the letter.
Questions to discuss with colleagues
1. What do you think was valuable in the âskillsâ and âcultural heritageâ models? How might they be adapted to deserve a place as part of the English curriculum today?
2. How broadly would you define the âskillsâ element in English in the light of new technology?
3. What do you think are the strengths and limitations of the âpersonal growthâ model as described by John Dixon?
4. Dixon felt later on that he had neglected âparticipantâ activities in the English lesson. With reference to your age phase suggest how you might introduce and develop a topic
a. involving children in research and debate;
b. writing factual accounts for the class or school magazine.
(See Section 3 for more about âparticipant roleâ and âspectator roleâ activities and language.)
Section 2: Play as the forerunner of cultural activity and the enjoyment of stories, drama and art
Extract 2
Source
Britton, J.N. (1971) The role of fantasy. English in Education, 5 (3), 42â3, 44.
Much has been written about the role of play in the learning of young children. In his article âThe role of fantasyâ James Britton makes the link between early play and cultural activities of all kinds which come later on. He reminds us that play is essentially a voluntary activity and that although there may be images of the real world in childrenâs play, the credibility of what they pretend is not a main concern. Britton sees the arts, including literature, as highly organised forms of play.