1
Introduction and Overview
Qualitative researchers are storytellers. There are many ways to tell a story. Biographers, autobiographers, autoethnographers, life historians, and oral historians all engage in the process of storytelling through life writing. Our opening premise for this book is that storytelling matters; it matters to individuals, it matters to cultures and subcultures, and it matters to our individual and collective beings as we engage our imagination about past, present, and future human experiences. Critical approaches to all of these forms of life writing require certain preconditions for storytelling; namely, that the storyteller be mindful of the powerful agency vested in the meaning-making storyteller, who must also understand that they are a story-creator first before they are a storyteller. The motivations qualitative researchers have for creating stories, the tools life writers use, and the various containers and vessels they shape to hold and transport these stories are worthy of continued examination.
Life writing projects have evolved as part of the expanding field of qualitative research approaches and have benefitted from the methodological musings of many scholars, which we will selectively highlight throughout the book. This book will introduce and discuss the similarities and distinctions between biography, autobiography, auto-ethnography, life history, and oral history approaches to life writing, as well as the arguments surrounding the often artificial boundaries between âfictionâ and ânon-fictionâ in social science representations of life stories. Examples from each will be used to illustrate the exciting work being done within each of these approaches and prepare the reader for the intellectual challenges and questions that life writing projects entail. We hope that as you contemplate your own life writing projects, you will find companionship within these pages and that you will revel in the possibilities for multiple pathways for creating and telling stories of lasting meaning using qualitative inquiry traditions, approaches, and tools.
Life writing projects have become part of the expanding field of qualitative research methods in recent years. In the last decade, biography and autobiographical genres have expanded to include autoethnography (Carolyn Ellis, Laurel Richardson, Stacy Holman Jones, and Tony Adams), duoethnography, oral history (Groundswell organization), radio and podcast productions (Murder, Someone Knows Something, and Serial), illustrated biographies (Zena Alkayat and Nina Cosford), performance ethnography (Tami Spry), theatrical performances drawn from interview transcripts (Anna Deavere Smith), and various other forms of innovative life writing. This book examines the different ways in which critical auto/biographical methods can enhance and elevate life writing projects by closely examining innovative approaches used in narrating critical life writing. This close examination provides researchers with:
- New methodological tools;
- A review and discussion of scholarsâ approaches to life writing projects;
- Guiding questions/prompts to help identify and learn to construct questions for each type of project;
- Ways to develop and write a life writing project, distinguishing among the array of types of life writing projects; and
- References to help further guide novice life writers.
Our intent in writing this book is to examine five different approaches to life writingâbiography, autobiography, autoethnography, life history, and oral historyâand compare them side by side so that we can see their similarities and differences. We do this by exploring how they are used in the usual and standard process of research, viz. starting with the research topic, research questions, data collection, data analysis, and writing up (or otherwise representing) the findings. We include the issues and dilemmas for each type of life writing approach, and some suggestions for evaluating them. We also address some blended versions, mashups, and/or extensions of these five approaches; for example, biography and autobiography have functioned as root and predominant categories. Collective biography can be understood as a methodological mashup between biography and qualitative inquiry in much the same way that collective autoethnography can be a methodological mashup between auto/biography and ethnography. And, using the arts to both create and communicate life writing projects can be extensions of these categories.
In putting together a book that is focused on different approaches to life writing, we wish to acknowledge the diversity in the field while presenting, in one place, a set of navigational tools. While the field of life writing is vast, we were drawn towards those research approaches to life writing that are most often used by students using the social sciences and novice qualitative researchers. We have included the often cited literature about life writing that we feel may be beneficial to qualitative researchers as well as additional writings that might help expand the range of possibilities for thinking about life writing projects. We hope that this book will provide those interested in life writing with a sense of how to conduct research within these approaches, how these particular approaches may differ from each other, and how to best determine the level of appropriateness when selecting an approach for a project, while at the same time encouraging methodological experimentation.
We direct this book towards students or novice researchers who have little or some knowledge of qualitative research and would now like to get a grasp of the diversity within life writing methods while also gaining an understanding of the overall research process. We write for those who are interested in starting a life writing project and would like a map of the territory to find their way into writing. We also write for our peers in academia who are from different disciplines (sociology, anthropology, history, geography, humanities, arts) and all those who seek to decolonize the writing of lives, who are advocates for hearing and learning from the messy stories of human beings. We write for those who are not content with telling human stories from a singular perspective.
Nesting Approaches to Life Writing within Critical Qualitative Research
We use the term âlife writingâ as an umbrella term to encompass a range of writing about lives, including but not limited to autobiography, biography, oral history, life history, autoethnography. While we touch on genres such as memoir, digital diaries, obituaries, or autobiographfiction, we do so to the extent that they emerge from the five categories we have chosen to expand in this book. We acknowledge that these distinctions and categories are not cast in stone. The blurring of distinctions between types of life writing has grown alongside a more general acceptance of life writing as a field of study. Neat categories fall apart when life writers reflect on the complexity of the lives they seek to represent and, instead of a chronological voice, what emerges is pluralistic, gloriously messy, multivoiced, and enhanced by the frames of critical theory.
Critical Approaches Signify a Value System
By the term âcritical,â we mean the capacity to interrogate and inquire against the grain. It means to ask questions that confront prevailing assumptions leading to an analysis, dismantling and uncovering omissions and invisibilities. A critical approach propels us toward a more nuanced understanding of intersectionality of identity constructions and reminds us that the way in which we construct life events/experiences and narrate or perform our interpretations can create the conditions for positive social change. Denzin and Giardina describe critical scholars as those
committed to showing how the practices of critical, interpretive, qualitative research can help change the world in positive ways. They are committed to creating new ways of making the practices of critical qualitative inquiry central to the workings of a free democratic society.
(Denzin and Giardina, 2013, p. 41)
A free democratic society is dependent upon bringing to fruition a vibrant notion of pluralism, both in thinking and in human interaction, and therefore qualitative researchers, taking up a critical approach, must be prepared to design knowledge-quests (i.e., qualitative inquiry projects) with the supposition that encouraging pluralistic thinking and knowing is valuable and essential.
To help situate researchers into the mindset of a critical life writer, we offer a series of research journal (RJ) and sketchbook (SB) exercises throughout the book. The first, below, illustrates the centrality of stories in our lives and why life writing requires us to listen to more than a single story.
Research Journal and Sketchbook Exercise 1
- View the following TED Talk by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, The Danger of a Single Story (https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?language=en), and write a page or two about what the title The Danger of a Single Story means to you in the context of life writing.
- Next, find a postcard (of anything!) and paste it in your sketchbook.
- Now imagine a person or a group of people who might inhabit the place or circumstance depicted on the postcard and write a fictional vignette that seems interesting and plausible to you about the life or lives of those you imagined.
- Next, write a second vignette that defies the assumptions you started with during the writing of your first vignette.
- Finally, re-draw, or trace, or in some fashion create a new postcard within your sketchbook that is more representative of the life or lives you have described in each vignette.
- In your journal, reflect on what you learned from this exercise about life writing approaches.
Exercises such as this provide life writers with opportunities to grow their capacity to understand and engage with critical life writing approaches. They make us aware of our assumptions and then challenge them. Through an imaginative retelling, we realize that several stories are possible if only we are aware of and set aside our own habitual ways of thinking. Life writing can be a way to understand the construction of the self, which encompasses the constructions of gender, race, culture, disability, sexuality, and ethnicity, among others such as place, nationality, and space. It involves issues of subjectivity, identity, and memory. It requires us to read so that we take into account truth, narrative and representation, and issues of power.
Critical Approaches Challenge the Status Quo
Critical approaches signify a value system. In this section, we take up the proposition that they also signify action. To understand what this means in the context of life writing research, we take up the challenge offered by critical scholars Cannella and Lincoln (2012) when they ask: âWhat does a critical perspective mean for research issues and questions, for frames that construct data collection and analyses, and forms of interpretation and re-presentation?â (Cannella and Lincoln, 2012, p. 104). To put this question within a frame of critical action, we turn to Pasque, Carducci, Kuntz, and Gildersleeve (2012) in order to gather our thoughts around qualitative inquiry as a âradical democratic actâ (p. 3) against inequities in higher education, and to Denzinâs (2010) Qualitative Manifesto: A Call to Arms, where he insists that critical inquiry is a âform of activism, of critiqueâ (p. 34). We consider these challenges and attitudes within the context of life writing with the following questions: What does a critical perspective mean for life writing projects? How can life writers consider the framing of their projects using critical approaches? We answer these questions throughout the book in our framing of life writing as a consciously critical act that opens up a creative process and leads us to see and understand the connections between a particular life and the human condition.
âCritical approachesâ is the phrase we use to situate the range of actions life writers take when designing and carrying out projects that aim to challenge the status quoâto address and redress neoliberal conditions that often render many voices and life experiences to invisibility or misinterpretation. Neoliberalism, defined broadly, is a policy that targets institutions that usually lie outside the market to bring them inside the market through privatization, elimination, or closure, or through reinvention. Education and trade unions are two prime examples of institutions affected by neoliberal policies. The ethical and social values that undergird neoliberal policies are those of competition. The state, as an active force, helps to create conditions that promote competition that produces inequality (Davies, 2014). Neoliberal conditions often fail to take into account the experiences of individuals within groups so that, as Robert McChesney (1999) explained, âproponents of neoliberalism sound as if they are doing poor people, the environment and everyone else a tremendous service as they enact policies on behalf of the wealthy fewâ (McChesney, 1999, p. 8). Critical approaches within a life writing context challenge the neoliberal condition as status quo. For critical scholars, a Bakhtinian notion of âselfâ is more appropriate for life writing. Bakhtinâs (1986; 1992) âselfâ is dialogically co-constructed and always historically contingent. The self is co-constructed through dialogue and works to preserve the different perspectives that it opens up. Bakhtinâs theory applied to life writing projects helps us understand not only that the subject of the life writing project is co-constructed by the life writer and the reader, but also reminds us of the constructed nature of time, place, and meaning-making. For example, Marlene Kadar (1999; 2014) and Sandeep R. Singh (2016) drew similar connections where they defined critical life writing as a practice that is meant to engage the reader in the text in a Bakhtinian way. By this they mean that when life writers engage with their subjects dialogically, the self of the other is not an objectivized self, and is instead whole, and the reader is able to similarly engage with the text and with the experiences of the lives recorded. A Bakhtinian reading is a d...