Which philosophy?
The field of philosophy, or the love of wisdom, as a discipline is wide and far reaching and considers many aspects of human existence such as knowledge, morals, ethics, religion, aesthetics and metaphysics. Philosophy provides insights by thinking critically about a range of issues that are of concern to us as human beings. However, the most pertinent philosophical contributions for existential therapists come from those philosophers who focus on human existence, the existential philosophers.
Existential philosophy focuses on understanding human existence, being in general and also on the specific way in which humans live and exist in the world. Early existential thinking can be found in the works of Athenian philosophers such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. However, it wasn’t until the start of the 20th century, with the work of Kierkegaard, the founding father of existentialism, that existential philosophy blossomed on the European continent. This period also marked a significant change in focus towards the human sciences and the development of psychology and psychological therapies.
Existential philosophers
The four main existential philosophers that have inspired therapists are Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855), Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) and Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980). However, existential therapists will also draw on the works of other existential philosophers such as phenomenologist Edmund Husserl (1859–1938), theologian Martin Buber (1878–1965), Karl Jaspers (1883–1969), Paul Tillich (1886–1965), Simone de Beauvoir (1908–1986), Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908–1961) and Albert Camus (1913–1960), to name but a few. Existential literature can also be very inspirational and novels by people like Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Kafka, Sartre, Camus and de Beauvoir are a good way to become familiar with existential concepts.
All of these authors were interested in examining human existence and their ways of being in the world, i.e. the being of human beings. They looked at the fundamental aspects of human existence that we all share (ontology), although each philosopher had their own particular focus on the aspect of living they were interested in. This means there is no one model to draw on, no blueprint for living (Deurzen, 1988). Instead, existential philosophy gives us a way, a method, for looking at human existence and the world and is based on certain philosophical assumptions:
• We are part of a world, a universe, which is much greater than ourselves.
• We find ourselves in (thrown into) a physical world over which we have little control.
• The world contains certain givens which we cannot change, i.e. our genetics, family, culture, society, geography, the laws of physics.
• We are always in this world with other people and in relation with these others.
• It is in being in relation to others that we define ourselves.
• We have particular ways of making sense of things, through language and ideas.
• We are always in search of purpose and meaning.
Existential philosophy
These philosophical assumptions provide the foundation on which we can understand our relationship to ourselves, others and the world around us. Existential philosophers, however, also examined other fundamental elements of our existence. Warnock (1970) believed the defining element that united existential philosophers was their focus on human freedom. What made the existential philosophers different from those philosophers who had gone before them was the fact that their philosophy had a practical aspect to it. Existential philosophers wanted people to be aware of what Tarnas called ‘the most fundamental, naked concerns of human existence’ (Tarnas, 1991: 389). Instead of just contemplating freedom from a theoretical perspective, existential philosophers wanted people to experience it and find meaning in it.
Existential philosophers highlighted that the only certainty we have is that we are limited in time, although the exact timing of our death is unknown to us, and this fact causes us to feel anxiety. We are also free rather than, or in addition to, being determined, both in how we make choices in the here and now regarding our values and how we decide to live and therefore define ourselves. Sartre (1943) believed we begin as nothingness and our sense of self is created through our interactions with the world and others: we are a process of becoming.
Our freedom to choose also means that we are responsible for our choices and we have to choose even though there is no way of knowing how these choices will play out in the future; this again causes us to feel anxiety. The absurdity of our existence as highlighted by Camus (1942) means that our existence and our responsibility for it are a struggle we have to grapple with, and it is through this struggle that meaning can be created. Camus concluded that it was this very search for meaning despite, and perhaps even because of, the fundamental absurdity that made life worthwhile.
How to live
Existential philosophers encourage us to confront the reality of our existence and to experience that reality, however anxiety provoking it may be. This confrontation with existence is not intended to paralyse or freeze the individual into inaction due to anxiety and worry but rather to help us to consider how to live better. For Kierkegaard (1843a) the purpose was to live life without illusion in a way that was true to the individual in relation to the infinite. Nietzsche (1895) also put responsibility back on the individual with his notion of the will to power, which motivates us. Nietzsche recognised that human beings sought to gain mastery of their environment and of themselves and that the power to change, or to live, was what inspired us to become who we are capable of being, rather than us being defined by an external being, such as a God. Heidegger (1927) wanted individuals to become aware of their being and to take awareness of the way they existed. This could only occur when we recognised our limitations, and particularly the ending of our life in death, and this required us to free ourselves from the impact of others on us. Heidegger believed that through awareness of the reality of our existence we would be able to make better and more authentic choices for ourselves as individuals as to how to live our lives. Sartre (1943) recognised the ways in which people deny the reality of their existence, by deceiving themselves about both what is the case and what is not the case. The fact of our esse...