
Joint Fact-Finding in Urban Planning and Environmental Disputes
- 214 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
Joint Fact-Finding in Urban Planning and Environmental Disputes
About this book
The days of rationalist scientific management and deference to official data are behind us. The credibility of experts and the information they provide are regularly challenged; officials are routinely provided with conflicting sets of facts as they plan and make decisions; and decision makers and stakeholders alike are largely skeptical that technical information will adequately account for the various interests and concerns and lead to the right outcomes. They struggle to reconcile technical information with other forms of knowledge, and differing interests, priorities and perspectives. Issues like climate change are complicating matters even further, as scientists and technicians must increasingly acknowledge the uncertainty and potential fallibility of their findings, and highlight the dynamic nature of the systems they are explaining.
This book examines how groups looking to plan and make decisions in any number of areas can wade through the imperfect and often contradictory information they have to make fair, efficient, wise and well-informed choices. It introduces an emerging and very promising approach called joint fact-finding (JFF). Rather than each stakeholder group marshaling the set of facts that best advance their respective interests and perspectives while discrediting the contradictory facts others provide, groups are challenged to collaboratively generate shared sets of facts that all parties accept. This book introduces readers to the theory of JFF, the value it can provide, and how they can adopt this approach in practice. It brings together writings from leading practitioners and scholars from around the world that are at the forefront of the JFF approach to science intensive policymaking, urban planning, and environmental dispute resolution. The first set of chapters outlines the concept of JFF, and situates it within other bodies of theory and practice. The second set of case-based chapters elucidates how JFF is being applied in practice.
This book delivers a new perspective to scholars in the field of public policy, urban planning, environmental studies, and science and technology studies, as well as public officials, technical experts, policy consultants, and professional facilitators.
Frequently asked questions
- Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
- Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Information
Table of contents
- Cover
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Table of Contents
- List of illustrations
- Notes on contributors
- Foreword by Lawrence Susskind: The theory and practice of joint fact-finding in public controversies
- Editor’s preface
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: the theory and practice of joint fact-finding
- 2 Joint fact-finding: process and practice
- 3 Towards a more humble inquiry: the practice of joint fact-finding
- 4 Joint fact-finding in science and technology studies
- 5 Communicative science
- 6 The TOP Arenas: enabling practical cooperation while fundamental disagreement continues
- 7 Facts for now, facts for use: satisficing and adapting in joint fact-finding
- 8 Linking science and decisions through collaborative processes: seven challenges, two approaches, four tools, five examples
- 9 Desalination in California: the California Coastal Commission/Poseidon Water joint fact-finding process
- 10 Energy and climate stakeholder processes in the United States
- 11 The practice of joint fact-finding for resolving science-intensive controversies in Japan after the Fukushima accident
- 12 Finding the facts about joint fact-finding: criteria and approaches for rigorous evaluation
- 13 Conclusion
- Index