1
The Changing Modus Operandi of the CMO
Job descriptions for a CMO role vary extremely widely. There are the traditional delineationsâB2C and B2B roles, for example, can be very different. Industry sector and size of business also impact on the type of CMO role an organization adopts. Company history and culture, the CEOâs mindset and C-suite support also factor into the make-up of a CMO. Personalities and interests of the CMO, as well, impact how the CMO approaches the task at hand.
Maryam Banikarim, SVP and CMO of Gannett Corp, Inc., talks about the CMOs who are members of the Marketing 50, a private community for senior-most marketers from globally respected organizations: âAll those CMOs have very, very different jobs from each other. No two CMO jobs are alike. And itâs increasingly a title that people just give out. It can just mean so many different things. And itâs a different job at different companies.â
According to Rob Malcolm, the CMO is âboth the best of jobs and the worst of jobs at the same time.â
Ultimately, the senior-most marketer of an organization is responsible for facilitating growth, sales and marketing strategy. He or she must work toward objectives such as revenue generation, cost reduction and/or risk mitigation. CMOs are faced with a diverse and growing range of disciplines in which they are required to be knowledgeable. And beyond the challenges of leading their own team, the CMO is invariably reliant upon resources beyond their direct control. Consequently, more than any other senior executive, the CMO must influence peers in order to achieve their own goals. Clearly this necessity to lead peers compounds the complexity of challenges faced by the CMO.
The somewhat unpredictable impact of marketing efforts coupled with the need to drive profits often leads to a short tenure for many CMOs. Global executive search firm Spencer Stuart researches and publishes an annual report on CMO tenure.1 The good news is that the most recent study shows an all-time high of 43 months average, or roughly 3.5 years. However thatâs woefully lower than the average tenure of a CEO or even a CFO.
Table 1.1 CMO Tenure
So whatâs behind the increase? According to Tom Seclow, who leads the North American Marketing Officer Practice for Spencer Stuart, the CMO is enjoying somewhat of an evolution. âCMOs are getting a lot of things right and gaining credibility among other C-suite members including CEOs. Theyâve always been in the position of being the advocate for the customer in the organization. Now, largely because of the Internet and their [CMOsâ] ability to leverage data and information, they can bring that into the organization in a quantifiable and meaningful way. Their ability to quantifiably describe not just who, but why and how customers are buying products and services is core to the business.â
According to Seclow, thereâs a new breed of CMOs. They have the technical qualities of course, but the CMO mandate now is so much broader. While they must have some technical understanding of all of the areas of marketing, they have specialists underneath them to execute programs, so the CMOs themselves have to be really good at leading the team and providing strategic direction, and they need to build credibility from their C-suite peers, particularly their CEO. In the past, it used to be that the CMO was the keeper of the brand and the creative guruâmuch more intuitive and not necessarily the type of person to be put in front of an industry analyst or financial analyst. Things have changed.
âAnd one of the phenomenons that we have seen,â Seclow continued, âis that there are more and more companies that look for marketing needs outside their industry. A common lament we hear is âHey, we know our industry sector really well, but we donât know the marketing function as well.â So 40 percent of our top marketing officer placements last year were working in a different industry than the one we put them in.â He reasons that marketing is a more transportable skill setâto be able to connect with customers or consumers regardless of industryâthat is the skill of identifying and communicating and relating to your customer is whatâs core to a CMOâs success.
Balance is important too. According to by Lisa Arthur, CMO of Aprimo and contributor to the Forbes CMO Network, âTodayâs CMOs are more accountable than they have been in the past. Marketing has always been part art. But, these days, itâs part science, too. Data-driven talent and big data analytics give CMOs the insights they need to truly propel the business forward. Many CMOs are also leveraging technology to automate much of the work, and as a result, they have become more focused on driving top line growth ⌠and once that special sauce is found between a CMO and a chief information officer (CIO)/CFO, no CEO or BoD [board of directors] wants to start tinkering.â Put simply, âthe answer is simple. CMO tenure is on the rise because CMOs are hitting their stride as change agents.â2 Of course thereâs an exception to every rule, and one CMO interviewed recently joined his organization where he was the third CMO in 50 years. Jeff Jones joined Target in 2012, following the two previous CMOs who spent over 20 years each with the retailer. He is also the first person that was hired from the outside and put straight onto the executive group.
At its very core, the CMO is supposed to have responsibility for the â4 Ps of marketingââpromotion, pricing, products and services, and placement (distribution). In 2012, IBM built on its 2011 global CMO study âFrom Stretched to Strengthened,â3 which surveyed over 1,700 CMOs in 64 countries, with a State of Marketing Survey 2012.4 In that survey, IBM reported that âmany high-performing organizations already recognize the fact that marketing can, and should, take a more active role in leading the customer experience.â
In an October 2012 webcast entitled âWhy Leading Marketers Outperformâ hosted by the IBM Center for Applied Insights, IBM built on its CMO insights with a survey of marketing professionals from around the world across more than 15 industries, cross-referencing financial performance. The results further strengthened the importance of owning the â4 Psâ: âleading marketers report greater effectiveness across all four of the classic marketing âPsâ ⌠They are more likely to assume an all-encompassing role, âowningâ the customer experience across channels and/or business functions. These marketing organizations also make spending decisions differently, employing a more analytical and cooperative approach. Often, line-of-business peers are part of the process, providing valuable input on the marketing mix.â
Figure 1.1 Influence of Marketing Organizations
But just as the marketing function continues to change and morph, Stephen Liguori, executive director of global innovation and new models at General Electric, suggests that there are three new âPsâ that marketers need to addressâprinciples, people and processâwhich altogether serve to deliver better business results.
Interestingly, Elisa Steele, CMO of Skype (see page 26) also refers to â3 Psâ but these are defined as:
1. âour programsâwhere they are, what we want them to be and how do we deliver them;
2. our processâhow do we be more efficient and not repeat the types of tasks that can either be done in automation or in a pooled resource environment where everybody doesnât have to keep figuring things out on their own; and
3. peopleâmaking an investment in our people, not only bringing in talent where we have critical gaps of talent but also taking a really more thoughtful approach around career development for the people in the team and who have passion and the desire to excel here.â
However itâs viewed, marketing is expanding its role in organizations and touching business aspects not traditionally included in the marketing suite such as customer service, technology platforms, internal communications and, the pièce de rĂŠsistance, setting enterprise-wide strategy.
Clearly, the CMO role is becoming increasingly complex given these added responsibilities, but CMOs are well-placed to deliver given their central role in the organization, the fact that they integrate across so many disciplines, their access to analytics, and their understanding of the customer and/or consumer.
In its white paper âThe Transformative CMO,â5 The Korn/Ferry Institute advocates that âthe mandate for todayâs CMO is nothing less than fundamental business transformation.â In this paper, Lauri Kien Kotcher, CMO of Godiva, is quoted: âMarketing is increasingly intertwined with all other functions in the company. CMOs need strong leadership skills to influence across the organization, cross-functionally, and geographically. We need to be able to adapt our plans based on rapid-fire feedback; this means moving together as an organization to drive results.â
Senior marketers have always leveraged their creative and analytic abilities, but the growing complexity of the business environment, the leap in customer centricity and consumer power, and the rapid pace of change is creating the need for a new breed of âsuper-heroâ CMO.
In its Deloitte Review paper entitled âFrom Mad Man to Superwoman,â6 the authors say that, âIf you ask industry observers to comment on the expectations versus the performance of CMOs today, there is a big delta. First, there is the notion of the âsuper CMO,â which Ad Age has described as someone whose mission âisnât just marketing, but strategy and overall growthâ of the company, or the CMO as a âsuper speciesâ defined by Media Post as someone who has âresponsibility for functions including operations, finance and public policy.â Slightly less aggressive, but still elevated, is the ideaâfrom one of the top talent recruiting firmsâof the CMO as âmarketingâs CEOâ.â Whatever the evolution of marketing is called, itâs clearly being elevated as a management function, and organizations are expecting more and more of their senior marketers.
Notes
2
The Chosen Ones
As a CMO or an aspiring CMO, how does one get the gig of a lifetime?âthat role that is life-changing, career-progressing and/or passion-fulfilling?
While not exactly statistically valid, the marketers who were interviewed for this book split roughly 50 percent appointed from outside the organizations, and the other 50 percent represented a combination of being promoted from within or from consulting the organization or they were connected personally. Itâs fair to say that as an organization looks to heighten the importance of marketing, the concept of appointing a âknown quantityâ to the senior-most role may be more appealing to some CEOs and boards. That said, there is the notion that âfresh bloodâ also is enticing when looking to adopt and promote significant change.
Onboarding
Once recruited or promoted, the onboarding experience for these mark...