This book will explore the challenges, constraints and opportunities for addressing and promoting the sexual health of men in Britain. It begins by considering many issues, including some of the ways in which sexual health has been defined in society, and discusses how the sexual health of men compared with that of women has received little attention from health researchers, policy makers and health service providers. It continues through the ensuing chapters to explore, highlight and critique some of the consequences of this for sexual health policy, service provision and healthcare practice. Ultimately the aims of the book are:
The book is aimed at health and social care professionals, e.g. nurses, social workers, health advisers, medics, sexual health service providers and others concerned about the sexual health and well-being of men. The authors hope that the book will provide a useful resource and add to the information available that focuses on the sexual health of men.
Sexual Health and British Society
The past few decades have seen increasing interest in sexual health as an area of concern for healthcare professionals and service providers in Britain. This has occurred against a backdrop of wider changes in healthcare policy, where the focus is primarily on prevention of ill health and promotion of healthy lifestyles.1,2 Since the emergence of HIV and AIDS in the twentieth century, issues such as sexual health and the need to provide for what were previously viewed as private issues between individuals have entered the public sphere.3-5 Sexual health is in general no longer simply a matter of a physical act with consequences for an individual, but is recognised by the Government, health and social care providers as an area of health need requiring planning, assessing and services to support it.6,7
However, the apparent recognition of a need to address sexual health issues at an individual and strategic level is juxtaposed by the silences that have developed around sexual health as a subject in itself and the way it has been addressed within a healthcare context. Discussions of sexual health as an area of need in health policy and the healthcare strategies used to promote it have been built around a very narrow view of what constitutes sexual health. This view had at its core an implicit assumption that the nature of sexual health was primarily concerned with physiological functioning.8 In this context a tradition of sexual-health work has developed in healthcare practice where it is more likely to be associated with reproductive function, the investigation and treatment of sexually transmitted infections and the prevention of unplanned pregnancy.9-11 As a result there exists in Britain a historical legacy of relatively little discussion amongst professionals, policy makers and service providers about any possible variation in peopleâs understanding of sexual health and the consequences of this for diverse populations. This has occurred despite the fact that as far back as 1975 the World Health Organization (WHO) urged healthcare professionals to widen their views on sexual health away from pure epidemiology and sexual intercourse towards a more positive and holistic approach. They called for:
The integration of the somatic, emotional, intellectual and social aspects of sexual being in ways that are positively enriching and that enhance personality, communication and love.12
In contrast to the situation in healthcare practice, the social sciences, particularly areas such as gender and cultural studies, have produced a vast array of literature investigating and discussing a wide variety of issues relating to sexual health, including sexuality, self-identity and social stigma. Of the studies investigating sexual health from a healthcare perspective, few have incorporated a person-centred approach. Up until the 1980s at least most continued with the push to âmeasureâ sexual health in terms of infection and pregnancy. In this environment little consideration was given to the wider components of sexual health and the possibility of variation in the associated sexual decision-making of different groups in society.13 As a consequence, with the exception of HIV/AIDS, which will be commented on later, discussing âsexual healthâ is to a great extent actually synonymous with âsexual ill healthâ and disease, with epidemiological studies forming the main and often only source of research data.
The majority of the research conducted under this restricted interpretation of sexual health centred on medical treatments for specific diseases such as sexually transmitted infections (STIs), or took the form of large surveys conducted by public health departments. The contribution of person-centred or sociological approaches from healthcare professionals to this challenging area of health were conspicuous by their absence. The reasons for the lack of information or investigation into the nature and consequences of sexual health from a healthcare perspective are complex. Some of the possible influencing factors relate to wider social attitudes to sexual health as an issue in itself, while others are specifically associated with the response of healthcare providers to sexual health as an area of healthcare.
Research into sexual health is impeded by a variety of issues related to the nature of sex and sexual expression in society.8 Sexual health has throughout history been inextricably associated with social taboo, privacy and blame. Long before the onset of HIV/AIDS, sexual practices had been colonised by concerns about immorality and fears about the consequences of moral decline in the political, public and private sphere.14,15 The Victorian purity movement for example, with its well-rehearsed warnings against sex outside marriage, masturbation and homosexuality has been well documented.15-18 Social action and sanctioning at the time served to perpetuate feelings of guilt and sin around any sexual expression outside the sanitised arena of marriage and procreation. As a result of this and many other examples, sexual health has regularly been subjected to degrees of silence over the years which have been difficult to overcome. This has contributed to the current situation where health researchers seeking to expand the pool of knowledge about the nature of human sexual experience and decision making have been hindered by the fact that the subject itself is still perceived as being ânot niceâ, too sensitive for objective research or unlikely to provide truthful responses.19
In the 1980s the emergence of AIDS and HIV as life-threatening conditions had a far-reaching impact on the need to discuss sexual activity and risk taking.20 As a result of the devastating effects of HIV/AIDS experienced worldwide, sexual health issues were openly discussed beyond the parameters of epidemiology. Efforts were made to explore the causes, consequences and effects of sexual illness on an individual and at societal level.21 Healthcare practice and research equally responded to the challenges arising from HIV/AIDS, recognising the consequences for patient care, infection control and professional health and safety amongst other issues.8 However, while the emergence and worldwide recognition of the seriousness of HIV/AIDS was both effective and invaluable in bringing into the public arena the importance of research and discussion into sexual health, the success of the efforts made in HIV/AIDS reveal other silences.
The political climate in the face of the widespread hysteria around HIV in the early 1980s played a central role in the disease and to some extent sexual ill health, becoming established in the minds of the public as being far removed from the experiences of the white, male, heterosexual norm.22 As a result gay men, black people, prostitutes and groups marginalised as âotherâ were identified as the primary cause of HIV infection and harbourers of the disease.13,23,24 Despite the progressive move towards wider consideration of sexual health called for by WHO in the 1970s, the effect of political attempts to manage the fear surrounding HIV/AIDS, by controlling sexual practices in the social and private spheres, resulted in a re-focussing on âillnessâ as a consequence of poor sexual practices. The possibility of any other causative or influencing contextual factors on sexual health were lost in the impetus by politicians and media sources to create and recreate the divisions between âusâ and âthemâ through the HIV tragedy, âgoodâ sex and health being again associated with morality and reunited with stoic versions of romantic love and duty.25-27 Once historical parameters of good versus bad were erected around sexual behaviour and reinforced by the scientific âproofâ provided by HIV research, lifestyles which did not conform to the ideal were labelled âunhealthyâ. The practical effect of this labelling on individuals belonging to these marginalised groups is evidenced later in this book through chapters exploring the sexual health of black and minority ethnic men. This has also been highlighted in the literature in relation to the effects on other socially excluded or marginalised communities in the UK and worldwide.22,28,29 However, with the emphasis of sexual-health work once again placed on prevention of the negative consequences of illness rather than promotion of health in any positive sense, what began as a public relations or harm-reduction exercise at parliamentary level also helped to confine the exploration of sexual health in its broadest sense.
The widespread and firm as...