Public relations has been defined in many waysâbut one of the more widely used definitions comes from the Public Relations Society of America: âPublic relations is a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publicsâ (PRSA, n.d., para. 5). One of the reasons there are so many definitions for public relations is that the industry has undergone many changes. With those changes, practitioners have worked to clarify their purpose and function in society by crafting a definition to effectively capture the true essence of public relations.
Historical Development
In an effort to help capture the essence of the development for modern public relations, Grunig and Hunt (1984) proposed four models, or ways, that public relations has been practiced.
The first is press-agentry, a time when the practice of public relations was primarily media relations strategies with the goal of gaining press coverage. During this time, âPress agents were concerned with generating publicity at almost any cost, and this approach engendered the unethical reputation of modern-day public relationsâ (Bowen, 2007, âEvolution of Public Relations Ethics,â para. 1). Edward Bernays, who is known as âthe father of public relations,â called this time period public-be-damned, as it represented a period in history where the public relations professional had no regard for the impact or responsibility to the public (Broom & Sha, 2013, p. 82).
Some suggest that Ivy Lee, a prominent public relations professional, is the reason public relations moved from this first model into a new paradigm of public information (Grunig & Hunt, 1984) that resulted in a new attitude toward the public, which Bernays titled public be informed. Lee released a declaration of principles, focused on providing the public with truth and accuracy (Bowen, 2007). Leeâs declaration of principles ushered in a new era for public relations professionals and introduced ethics as a key part to the industry.
The third model of public relations practice is two-way asymmetric, focusing on providing information to the public in an effort to persuade them. This aligns with an attitude toward the public that Bernays called mutual understanding (Broom & Sha, 2013). This is a step closer to our modern practice, as the goal was not just to provide information but to ensure that efforts were made to determine whether the information was received, understood, and acted upon by stakeholder groups. It put a greater focus on research and measurement, requiring public relations professionals to have more accountability for activities.
The fourth, and current, model is two-way symmetrical (Grunig & Hunt, 1984) and is focused on honest and reliable communication between organizations and publics. The goal of this type of communication is that both organizations and the public can adjust to each other. The attitude toward the public shifted to be one of mutual understanding (Broom & Sha, 2013, p. 82), a stark contrast to the one-way communication and publicity stunts on which public relations was founded. This shift is particularly relevant to the historical contexts happening at the time as pointed out by Broom and Sha (2013):
Antiwar protests, the consumer movement, environmental activism, civil rights, and other demonstrations of the increasing power of citizensâincluding aroused and empowered minoritiesâchallenged the status quo. Mutual understanding would no longer satisfied those demanding change.
(p. 82)
In summary, the PR industry moved from a model dedicated to gaining publicity at all costs (press-agentry model) to a model committed to mutual adjustment, where organizations and publics communicate in an honest and open environment and are willing to compromise (two-way symmetrical). The industry began with no interest in the impact to the public (public be damned) and has advanced to recognize the ethical and fiduciary responsibilities that are required by public relations professionals toward the public (mutual adjustment).
Many of the misconceptions about the purpose, work, and role of public relations can be clarified when examining history. It is important to understand why some people may have the misconception that public relations is about spin and hiding the truth. It is equally as important for public relations professionals to be prepared to address the ways in which the industry has advanced, understanding the models, perspectives, and ethics that now guide our industry.
Practice of Public Relation
In addition to understanding our history, understanding how public relations is practiced is also critical. The public relations process involves four steps. There have been many acronyms used to describe this process: RACE (Marston, 1963) and ROPE (Hendrix, Hayes, & Kumar, 2012) are two ones that are often cited. RACE stands for (1) research, (2) action planning, (3) communication, and (4) evaluation. ROPE stands for (1) research, (2) objectives, (3) programming, and (4) evaluation. The Certificate in Principles of Public Relations and the Accreditation in Public Relations both use the model RPIE in their study guide. This stands for (1) research, (2) programming, (3) implementation, and (4) evaluation.
While there are different titles used, you will notice they follow the same model. Everything starts with research. Public relations professionals conduct both qualitative and quantitative research in order to prepare for actionsâthey do not simply respond. Only once they have a comprehensive view of the issue or opportunity, the publics that are influenced, and the organizationâs dynamics, they can begin to formulate the next step. This is the programming stage where professionals map out what should happen. This is one reason why the definition of public relations has strategic as a core component. Public relations professionals design plans that are strategic because they are based and grounded in research. The programming stages have several components such as developing a goal; crafting SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely) objectives; and outlining strategies and tactics to achieve those objectives. Then, it is time to implement the plan. During this stage of the campaign, public relations professionals enact their planâand they stay engaged. If something is not working, they adjust. The public relations process is not a static activity that, once started, never changes. Rather, it is fluid. The implementation stage requires constant monitoring, measuring, and evaluation to ensure that it is being effective. Finally, it concludes with evaluation of the entire initiative. This allows professionals to determine whether their work was successful in producing the outcomes desired and also lays the foundation for future campaigns.
This brief overview of the history and practice of public relations gives insight into how we have arrived at the definition of PR. It is now a process deeply committed to the good of the public, bound with ethical obligations, and is practiced in a systematic way that allows for strategic management of communication initiatives with the goal of fostering mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and its publics.
If you have never studied public relations, a more robust understanding of history and the process are critical. Two excellent sources are Cutlip & Centerâs Effective Public Relations (Broom & Sha, 2013) and Public Relations: Strategies and Tactics (Wilcox, Cameron, & Reber, 2015). The focus for this text is to build off of the foundation of our history and process, and explore what competencies are needed by the modern PR professional in order to thrive. Additionally, particular sectors of public will be explored to understand their similarities and differences.