PART I:
CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES
Chapter 1
Selecting Service-Oriented Employees Based on Person-Organization Fit
Mustafa Tepeci
INTRODUCTION
In the past two decades, many businesses have begun to emphasize improving customer service quality to increase customer satisfaction, which in turn influences customersâ behavioral intentions to return to a particular organization (Heskett, 1986). In highly competitive markets such as hospitality and service industries, service quality is a critical determinant of organizational success (Clow, 1993).
Increased competition and customer demand for quality will require hospitality companies to employ customer-oriented individuals who are committed to delivering high-quality service and performing the type of service customers demand. Because the customer/service provider interaction is such a vital part of the hospitality/service quality equation (Surprenant and Solomon, 1987), the hospitality organizationâs success depends, to a large extent, on the characteristics of its employees. The impression made by the individual providing the service is especially important since customers have minimal cues for evaluating service quality versus product quality (Clow, 1993). Customer contact personnel are expected to be highly adaptable to many different customers and situations. Hospitality firms can distinguish themselves from competitors by delivering superior quality and exemplary service with a service-oriented workforce.
Therefore, the purpose of this chapter is to discuss effective methods for selecting service-oriented employees based on person-organization fit. To achieve this objective, prior research that has identified characteristics of service-oriented employees has been summarized and effective human resource practices for selecting service-oriented employees are discussed.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Service Orientation
Service orientation has been defined as the disposition to be helpful, thoughtful, considerate, and cooperative when dealing with customers and associates (Hogan, Hogan, and Busch, 1984). Service-oriented employees are responsive to customersâ needs and they contribute to the morale of their work groups. They treat customers and co-workers with courtesy, consideration, and tact (Hogan, Hogan, and Busch, 1984). The service orientation of employees may increase both the quality of service and the overall performance of a company.
Dienhart, Gregorie, and Downey (1990) examined the service orientation of restaurant employees and managers employed by a pizza restaurant corporation. Based on data collected from a nationwide sample of 334 restaurants, 852 employees, and 309 managers, the researchers found that service orientation consists of three elements: organizational support, customer focus, and service under pressure. This study also explored how service orientation was related to other important job attributes: service orientation could be predicted based on job involvement, job satisfaction, job security, team orientation, and intention to quit. The results revealed that increasing job security, satisfaction, and involvement could improve employeesâ service orientation.
Groves, Gregorie, and Downey (1995) revealed similar components of service orientation: personal focus, organizational support, and reduced service under pressure. Personal focus was defined as the tendency of a server to provide good service. Organizational support measured employeesâ perceptions of management support for providing good service. Service under pressure was influenced by the expectations of customers and management for delivery of quality service during busy hours and stressful situations. Although the study reported no significant relationship between performing well operationally and having employees with a high level of service orientation, it illustrated how an organizationâs human resource practices may affect service quality.
Several studies have shown a positive relationship between the service orientation of an organizationâs employees and operational indicators. Dienhart, Gregorie, and Downey (1990) suggested that service-oriented employees are important to every job in a food service organization because they help create a positive image and increase the quality of life in the workplace. George and Bettenhausen (1990) reported a positive correlation between sales and positive customer relationships. Schneider and Bowen (1985) argued that service-oriented individuals stay longer and contribute to an organizationâs commitment to service quality.
Hogan, Hogan, and Busch (1984) developed a personality measure from the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) that would help identify the service orientation of employees. The scales included in that measure, the Service Orientation Index (SOI), were adjustment, sociability, and likability. The SOI was an alternative to both cognitive and honesty testing, and it was developed as a measurement tool for assessing employees for high customer contact positions (Cran, 1994). The index consists of ninety-two âtrue-falseâ statements. The following are examples of items on the scale: I always practice what I preach; I rarely lose my temper; I always notice when people are upset; I enjoy helping people; and I never resent it when I donât get my way. Cran (1994) found that the SOI was a valid predictor of on-the-job performance among a sample of 101 nursing aide staff in a hospital. They also found service orientation to be consistently and substantially correlated with overall job performance in studies of several different service occupations, including nursing home employees (n = 30), clerical personnel in a large insurance firm (n = 100), senior nursing students (n = 37), and truck drivers (n = 56).
Human Resource Management Practices for Achieving a Service-Oriented Workforce
Hospitality organizations generally employ two human resource practices to improve customer service: work redesign and training. Work redesign is the altering of jobs to increase both the quality of employeesâ work experience and their productivityâsuch as moving employees from one job to another to provide them with variety and stimulation. The most common practice has been to train employees in desired social behaviors such as maintaining eye contact and speaking pleasantly (Cran, 1994).
Although organizations strive to hire the best candidates, they still need to invest time and money to train these employees. Training may give the organization an opportunity to distinguish itself from competitors. However, the trainability of individual employeesâi.e., personal abilities, willingness to learn, motivation, and attitudesâalso differs (Cran, 1994). An organization may have the best training delivered by the best facilitators, but if the organization has not selected the right people, training programs cannot produce the desired results. More service-oriented employeesâthose who are pleasant, polite, and helpful in dealing with others (Schneider, Wheeler, and Cox, 1992), and who possess a helpful, thoughtful, considerate, and cooperative disposition (Hogan, Hogan, and Busch, 1984)âwill be more receptive to service training (Cran, 1994). These employees will perform their work more dependably and reliably, while requiring less supervision. It is easier to hire an employee who is already service oriented than to later invest resources in one who is not.
Many service organizations have tended to rely on training programs to improve employeesâ service orientation and to intensify their commitment to customers. This tendency presumes that service orientation is an attitude that can be acquired by anyone (OâConner and Shewchuk, 1995); however, this is not the case. Individual differences in personality and in service skills mean that some employees are better suited to high customer contact positions than others (Rosse, Miller, and Barnes, 1991; OâConner and Shewchuk, 1995). Several studies have demonstrated that certain people have more of a service orientation than others do (Cran, 1994; Groves, Gregorie, and Downey, 1995; Hogan, Hogan, and Busch, 1984). Given this, selection plays a much more important role in creating a service-oriented workforce than do work design and training. Selecting individuals with appropriate levels of service orientation can help hospitality organizations deliver superior quality and exemplary service.
Selecting Service-Oriented Employees
One of the most difficult tasks a manager or entrepreneur faces today is finding the right person for the job. In service markets, where competitors strive to distinguish themselves through service quality (Partlow, 1993), identifying a potential employeeâs level of service orientation has become an increasingly important basis for effective personnel selection and placement (Schneider and Schechter, 1991). Personnel staffing that selects individuals with appropriate levels of service orientation can help hospitality operations acquire an excellent service climate.
Previous literature on selecting service-oriented employees for hospitality organizations has focused mainly on developing, validating, and using various tests and inventories. This is largely because properly implemented preemployment psychological testing is an objective, reliable, nondiscriminatory, and noninvasive means by which an employer can inexpensively evaluate applicant attitudes that are predictive of job performance (Gatewood and Field, 1994). Testing can help employers quickly and accurately assess an applicantâs integrity, ease of supervision, willingness to follow safety procedures, and use of drugs or alcohol on the job. Another reason for the use of selection testing has been the growing body of research demonstrating that properly developed selection tests are both valid and legally defensible, and that many of the concerns about the fairness of selection tests were unfounded (Gatewood and Field, 1994; Harris, 1997).
Hogan, Hogan, and Buschâs (1984) study aimed to develop and validate a personality measure that would identify the service orientation of an applicant or employee. Sengstake (1993) tried to improve the measurement of service orientation by developing and validating a service orientation scale. Sengstake compared the newly developed service orientation scale (SOS) with Hogan, Hogan, and Buschâs (1984) SOI in a health care setting and found evidence of greater reliability and construct validity of the SOS.
Employee service orientation has also been measured through standard personality tests. These tests, such as the Big Five, Kuder Inventory, and California Psychological Inventory measure a personâs dispositional characteristics (e.g., extroversion and dependability). However, they have been criticized for their historic inability to predict job performance (Hunter and Hunter, 1984; Schneider and Schmitt, 1986). Using such personality tests and inventories is a difficult method of assessing an individualâs service orientation because these instruments attempt to quantify intangible constructs through the use of inferred data. Because personality tests are not derived from unique job analysis and not related to specific job tasks, they have not been able to significantly improve employee selection practices (Schneider and Schmitt, 1986).
Studies suggest that the Customer Service Questionnaire (CSQ) and Biographical Data (Biodata) are two instruments that measure service orientation effectively. Research on these assessment devices has shown encouraging results for selecting reliable and hardworking employees (Ineson, 1992; Dickinson and Ineson, 1993). These assessment devices enable organizations to collect information from a small group of applicants easily and quickly. The CSQ is a potentially useful and valid instrument because many of the qualities desirable in customer-contact employees are assessed by the CSQ (Dickinson and Ineson, 1993). It was designed to identify personality traits required by employees with a high level of customer contact. The CSQ identifies eleven personality traits that are grouped into four key areas: relationships with people, emotions and energy, thinking style, and need for social approval. The questionnaire provides a valid means of assessing whether people are trustworthy, fair-minded, and thorough in their work. Those persons gaining high scores are confident, clear, and sensitive communicators, and reliable and consistent in their effort.
Biodata explores an individualâs typical past and present behaviors or experiences in a referent situation likely to have occurred during his or her life. Biodata has been shown to efficiently predict a wide range of criteria (Nickels, 1994). Biodata is potentially well-suited to measure service orientation because it uses personal biographical information that is assumed to be predictive of future behavior (Asher, 1972). The information can be collected from application forms for current or potential employees. In a pilot study of the use of Biodata for selecting applicants for front-of-the-house positions in a hotel, Ineson (1992) found that 80 percent of a small sample (n = 51) of the current employees may have been classified correctly into good and bad worker subgroups by the combined use of CSQ and Biodata.
Shortcomings in Service-Orientation Assessment
The literature on selecting service-oriented employees has focused on the use of various assessment devices. However, their low validity and reliability, high costs, and time requirements have prevented hospitality practitioners from using these devices effectively. Researchers argue that personality tests are time consuming and impractical to administer (Gatewood and Field, 1994; Hunter and Hunter, 1984). Hunter and Hunter (1984) also criticized the personality measuresâ inability to predict job performance. To select the ârightâ individual, the selection measures must be able to predict performance on the job. High employee turnover rates, 100 percent to 120 percent for some hotel positions (Forbes and Forbes, 1995/1996) and the resulting costs clearly reveal that there is a need for better techniques for selecting service employees. Little research has assessed the validity and utility of the most widely used methods for selecting hospitality service employees: interviews, application blanks, and reference/background checks.
In addition to service orientation, hospitality service providers require a wide range of competencies. Schneider and Bowen (1985) argue that service employees need interpersonal skills, behavioral flexibility, and empathy. Ulrich et al. (1991) suggest that increased employee commitment leads to increased customer commitment. Heskett (1986) asserts that one of the most important characteristics of the employee is the desire and will ...