We Will Not Go to War

Conscientious Objection during the World Wars

Felicity Goodall

• Publisher: The History Press
• Year: 2011
• Print ISBN: 9780752458571
• eBook ISBN: 9780752476445
• Topic: History
• Subtopic: World History
• Index: History

During the First and Second World Wars thousands of men and women refused the call to arms. Reviled, starved and beaten, theirs was a battle of conscience. In the First World War, seventy-three conscientious objectors died as a result of their treatment, and hundreds more were imprisoned. During the Second World War, many conscientious objectors performed other, non-combatant duties with great heroism, including bomb disposal, and joining the fire service and ambulance crews. Unable to turn a blind eye to the dark realities of war, these men and women, who came from all classes and backgrounds, wrestled with their moral values, and their struggles, motivations and stories are brought together in this moving and challenging history of war's outcasts.

CHAPTER 1

Individualists to the Core

On 2 March 1916, eighteen months after the onset of the First World War, British men became subject to conscription for the first time. Sixteen thousand of them chose to register as conscientious objectors and the word ‘conchie’ became a term of abuse. Reviled and scorned by the public, many of them were also maltreated by the military, some were even sentenced to death.

I remember telling somebody that if I was the only person in the world I would take this attitude. That’s how I felt about it. It was a very personal thing.

Howard Marten

Transport yourself back to the summer of 1914, to a country largely without electricity and largely untouched by the omnipresent motor car. Every town and village is buzzing with the expectation of war and the anticipation of the glory to be won on the battlefield.

Harold Bing was a schoolboy in Croydon.

My attitude towards the war was of course critical from the start. This was very largely because I’d grown up in a pacifist home. My father as a young man had been very much influenced by his reading of Tolstoy, had become a pacifist, had opposed the Boer War and many of the friends whom he met and who came to our home were people who took that point of view. When I heard that a big anti-war demonstration was to be held in Trafalgar Square on Sunday the 2 August 1914 and Keir Hardie was to be one of the speakers, I walked from my home up to Trafalgar Square – about eleven miles – took part in that demonstration, listened to Keir Hardie and walked home again afterwards which might have shown a certain amount of boyish enthusiasm for the anti-war cause. It was quite a thrilling meeting with about ten thousand people there and certainly very definitely anti-war. Of course at that very same time while we were demonstrating in Trafalgar Square the Cabinet was sitting at Downing Street discussing the entry of England into the war and deciding on the ultimatum which brought England into the war two days later on 4 August.

Howard Marten was another man with a pacifist pedigree – his father was a Quaker and he was brought up in a nonconformist atmosphere, like many conscientious objectors. As a schoolboy he had attended pacifist meetings during the Boer War.

I was as a boy always inclined to pacifist views. I could never side with the idea of martial violence. It didn’t appeal to me at all; even as far back as the Boer War, I felt that that was inconsistent with our Christian beliefs. I was in school and enjoyed a certain amount of unpopularity even at that time, because of my pacifist views, and there was a good deal of violence in London towards what they called ‘pro-Boers’ – that was the epithet which was flung at pacifists. The Old Queen’s Hall, which was bombed in the last war, was the scene of many meetings. That I think was my first experience of being personally involved in peace work, although my grandfather was the secretary and treasurer of a Kentish peace society, so that there was an aura of pacifism rather hanging over our family, and he did a lot of active work towards peace.

Harry Stanton was the son of a Luton blacksmith.

One had a growing sense of isolation, that one was surrounded by people who thought in different terms, who spoke, as it were, a different language. It seemed useless to discuss the war with them; their standards of conduct were depreciated, though they would refuse to acknowledge it. Yet to me the very isolation gave a strange sense of joy – perhaps an expression of my combatant instinct! The facile taunts and innuendoes of the ‘man in the street’, provided daily by the leader writers of the popular press, had the effect of stiffening my resolution. And now and again as I met men and women whose convictions were leading them along the same unpopular course, came the feeling that here was something worth doing, that somehow we must hang on to this foundation of truth and sanity we had discovered, until the flood of passion and wrong thinking had subsided.

Fenner Brockway was an Independent Labour Party activist and editor of the Labour Leader, the organ of the ILP.

I remember the day war was declared how our heading – the banner heading – on the Labour Leader was ‘The German Workers Are Still Our Brothers’. And we were encouraged by the fact that in Germany there were socialists who were opposed to the war just as we were.

In 1915, with the prospect of conscription, the opposition to the war took a new form. It was my wife who suggested that those of us who would refuse military service should get together. I didn’t feel I could advocate this in the columns of the Labour Leader, although I was editor, because in a sense it was unconstitutional action and I didn’t want to commit the party to that as a party. So I got my wife to write a letter to the paper and she did. And as a result of that names poured in of young men who would refuse to fight in the war. The interesting thing was that it was not only young socialists. It was young religious people; mostly young Quakers but others as well, Methodists – Primitive Methodists.

Mark Hayler was one of the first fifty members of the No-Conscription Fellowship.

The first meeting of any size was held at the Friends Meeting House at Bishopsgate, and there was a riot and the soldiers and the rest stormed the gates of the meeting house. So the chairman said, who I think was Clifford Allen, ‘So as not to disturb the crowd outside’ (they could hear us clapping inside) ‘wave your handkerchiefs’. I’ve never seen that done before. This technique of crowd control reportedly worked!

So the No-Conscription Fellowship was formed with a membership of 8,000. It would become, as one conscientious objector termed it, ‘the most abused institution in England’. Fenner Brockway became its secretary.

I wouldn’t say that we had any common philosophy then. We hadn’t worked out all the implications of pacifism. But the statement of principles which those who joined the No-Conscription Fellowship were asked to sign spoke of the sanctity of human life and in its essence was pacifist. And we had the most remarkable unity between the young socialists and the young Quakers and the young religious people.

Howard Marten was one of those young Quakers. The Society of Friends had first adopted their peace testimony in the 1660s, laying the foundations for Quaker pacifism.

You found the ranks of the No-Conscription Fellowship were made up of men from every conceivable walk of life. You had all sorts of religious groups, from the Salvation Army to the Seventh Day Adventists; Church of England, Roman Catholics; there was no limit. It was a sort of cross section of every type. Then you had in addition to that the more politically minded: the Independent Labour Party, and different degrees of socialists, and the ordinary political parties. Then a very curious group of what I used to call artistically minded. There were a lot of men who were not in any way organized or attached, but I should call them the aesthetic group: artists, musicians, all that. They had a terrific repugnance at war which could only express itself individually. You see artists and people of that calibre are very personally minded. They’re not group minded. They’re individualists to the core, so that naturally they would, almost inevitably, take a very personal attitude to that sort of thing.

Harry Stanton found his views on pacifism hotly contested by many of his friends and formed the Luton branch of the NCF on his twenty-first birthday.

In the very first days of the war I was defending, or rather advocating, the Quaker position with regard to war among my friends, many of whom were on the point of enlisting; though they generally acknowledged war to be an evil, they believed that in this case England must prefer the expedient course to the right one. If, however our discussions served no other purpose, they made known my attitude towards war, and prepared the way for what was to follow.

As conscription became more and more inevitable, those of us who had adopted the pacifist attitude began to consider wither our opposition would lead us. For an individual to attempt to resist the power of the state would be a tremendous venture. The number of persons prepared to make such an attempt must be very small, but they would be infinitely stronger if they could form a common plan of action.

Harold Bing and his father both joined the Croydon branch of the NCF.

The general public was not prepared to listen to propaganda at that time and while a number of meetings were held they were often broken up and speakers were thrown into ponds and otherwise maltreated. I, for example, on one occasion, was distributing literature house to house – we did a good deal of that, anti-war literature house to house – and was pursued by an infuriated householder who saw the literature, quickly came out and chased me for a long distance until he lost me in the darkness carrying with him a very heavy stick.

Unlike her Continental neighbours, Britain had drawn her fighting men from vigorous recruitment campaigns, without using the tool of conscription. But conscriptionists had been actively promoting the case for conscription since 1901, and as the war failed to be ‘over by Christmas’, pressure for conscription mounted. The National Registration Act of 1915 had already registered all men between the ages of sixteen and forty; it was followed by the Derby Scheme of Attestation offering inducements to those who would register as volunteers to be called on should the need arise. Chemist Harold Blake was among the thousands who were canvassed.

One of the promises given was the undertaking that no married men would be called until the supply of single ones was exhausted; while another was the right of appeal for exemption from active service from specially created tribunals. The impression was created among the public – no doubt intentionally – that all who did not attest would be conscripted before any of the groups were called up, and that only by attestation could the right of appeal be gained. The obvious result, beside the recruiting of all who sincerely meant to serve in case of need, was that the cowards took fright and flocked to attest, thinking that only thus could they obtain permission to appeal and in that manner escape military service. I myself had a canvasser visit me, who distinctly told me that if I did not attest I should be fetched among the first, and without the right of appeal. After listening to all he had to say I plainly told him that under no circumstances would I volunteer for war service. My employer also applied pressure, telling me that only by attestation could I hope to escape. I replied that if I refused to become a soldier, no power on earth could make me into one, to which uncompromising statement he replied, ‘No! but they can send you to prison.’ I gave him to understand that I was prepared to risk that contingency.

Yorkshireman Horace Eaton was also canvassed.

I well remember the Saturday afternoon when a gentleman called at our house for this purpose, and I had a long talk and discussion with him. I stated my willingness to join the RAMC for Red Cross service, if he could guarantee my entry into that branch, and that I should not be transferred to any other section. He said he should be able to manage that all right, but could not give any guarantee and so there the matter ended.

I was the only one on the staff of the firm by which I was employed who did not attest, and of course many were the remarks passed, and a black picture painted of what I should have to endure under conscription. My employer kindly allowed me absolute freedom in this matter and only wished to know my intentions, in order to make his plans for carrying on the business.

Quaker Howard Marten recalled the prevailing attitude to conscientious objectors.

I think people got the impression that it was only that people wouldn’t fight. It was something more than that: it was an objection to having one’s life directed by an outside authority.

As the First World War developed, the shortage of manpower rather indicated that there would be, at some time or other, a measure of conscription, and though I never had two minds about my personal position in the event of conscription, we did have a meeting of a limited number of friends and contacts of mine who were of similar views and we had to face, even at that stage, how far our views were consistent with an extreme attitude: that is were we prepared to adopt a pacifist position even to the point of being shot. We little realized at the time that it was going to come to that.

Mark Hayler worked in a reform school in Cheshire and objected on many grounds.

I claimed that in England there was an old tradition that a man had a right to stand on his own feet. It was a political attitude I suppose and I maintained it all the way through, although in my statement I took an ethical line, that was merely to bump up my case.

Eric Dott grew up in a comfortable middle-class home in Edinburgh.

I’m not quite so sure now but I did very much think at the time that this was the only way to help to prevent future wars, to register my protest as a CO that war was wrong and that I would take no part in it and hoping that in the future that view would prevail and perhaps future wars would be prevented by a growing number of COs until they couldn’t get enough soldiers to fight.

Eric had taken on board the ideals of both his mother and father.

In the first place my mother was a very earnest Christian and my first idea as the war was going on was that this was wrong, that it was unChristian and it was utterly wrong to take life. My father was increasingly a socialist and I think the war which he hated, which he looked upon as just a scramble for territory and wealth and markets, he looked upon as just an utterly immoral thing from that international socialist point of view, and I became increasingly interested in that. So at the time I was called up I had a sort of dual feeling, I still thought war was wrong as a Christian and therefore refused to go, but I also thought the war was a wicked war from a socialist point of view.

Fenner Brockway and Clifford Allen were both on the board of the No-Conscription Fellowship. Clifford Allen lost three stone in prison and died six months before the Second World War, weakened by his years in prison. Despite his stand as a conscientious objector, Clifford Allen was honoured with a peerage in 1932 and Fenner Brockway took his seat in the House of Lords in 1964.

Both Clifford Allen and I were inclined at that time (1915) to take an absolute pacifist view and to take the view that we were not merely resisting a conscription act but that we were witnessing for peace. And that it was an action not only against the war of 1914–18, but an action against war altogether. I may remark that both of us changed our philosophy later on in our lives, but that was our view then. There was a group that took the view that this action was against the conscription act. Some of them were inclined to be philosophically anarchistic, like C.H. Norman who supported resistance to conscription because it was an authoritarian state intervention with the individual. I would say the number who took that view were small. It wasn’t a matter of great debate and I don’t think it was a serious division.

CHAPTER 2

Conscription

They never dreamed there would be men who would defy the British Army. That was unthinkable; you might defy some native army, but you’d never defy the British Army.

Mark Hayler

The Military Service Act introducing conscription took effect on 2 March 1916. Harry Stanton remembered the surrounding publicity, including public hoardings lavishly spread with recruiting posters:

WILL YOU MARCH TOO

OR WAIT UNTIL MARCH 2?

Conscientious objectors felt the repercussions even before they fell into the hands of the military. Harold Blake was employed by a chemist in Northampton who knew his views.

Towards the end of March 1916, my employer told me that he thought the military authorities would not allow two qualified chemists to remain in one business, and as I had not attested and he had, he would probably be called to the colours and in that event he would close down the business. He then asked me whether I would prefer to await that event or to seek another situation at once. Seeing that my presence was undesirable because he considered that it jeopardized his prospects of exemption, I intimated to him that I would move on at once.

With conscription in place Mark Hayler also thought about moving on.

I thought of going on a farm but it was only releasing another man. There were odd ideas that the COs should get together and disappear. We met, the few of us who were COs in Warrington, met at the gasworks in the boiler house. There might have been eight or ten of us. How dedicated they were I don’t know, if the military had come down on us some would have gone into the army, as they did. But we decided that we would go to Scotland and we would live in the woods up there, it seems crazy when you think of it now, but it seemed to be a way to meet the immediate situation, to evade ...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title
• Dedication
• Copyright
• Contents
• Foreword by the Revd the Lord Soper
• Preface
• Introduction to the 2010 Edition
• Acknowledgements
• 1. Individualists to the Core
• 2. Conscription
• 3. The ‘Frenchmen’
• 4. Prison
• 5. The Home Office Scheme
• 6. Those at Home
• 7. Friends Ambulance Unit
• 8. Aftermath
• 9. The Interwar Years
• 10. War Clouds
• 11. A New Generation
• 12. Women
• 13. Non-Combatant Corps
• 14. Bomb Disposal
• 15. On the Land
• 16. In the Hands of the Army
• 17. The Absolutists
• 18. Service in the Blitz
• 19. Friends
• 20. A Change of Heart
• 21. Hindsight
• Further Reading