āThe lecture is the obvious format that highlights the link between teaching and performance. We just have to think about the lecture hall as an auditorium. There is an oratory tradition to these spaces, but the Greeks referred to the stage as the orchestra, which means the dancing place. Nowadays, lectures also add a huge screen and project presentation slides, so our students are sitting in a kind of cinema. This can, perhaps inevitably, build a sense of expectation of the lecturer to fulfil the role of performer.ā
Anna McNamara, Interview 9
When we are teaching, to some extent we have probably all had the feeling that we are performing; that we are āplaying a roleā; that we are āon stageā; that we are acting a part. However, I would like to say from the outset that I do not view teachers as actors: this perspective places the teacher centre stage, which is unhelpful in a higher education landscape where we are focusing more and more on student-centred approaches and active learning (see Chapter 7). It is also clear that teachers are not actors; they are themselves, perhaps variations of themselves, but themselves nonetheless. I return to this point below.
A current trend in higher education in many countries is the shifting relationship between students and their universities. This is driven by the increasing marketisation of higher education, from the emergence of for-profit colleges in the United States (e.g. Angulo 2016) to increasing tuition fees in the United Kingdom. All of this leads to greater consumeristic expectations of students. For example, a Universities UK survey (2017) of just over 1,000 undergraduates revealed that almost half of students (47%) considered themselves to be customers of their universities. This in turn has implications for the professionalisation of teaching in higher education and the subsequent scrutiny of teaching quality and teaching performance. Here, we are not concerned with performance in terms of quality management, and review and evaluation of teachersā performance. Instead, we focus on the teacherās own notions of performance, mindful of the potential for teachers to experience greater (performance) anxiety as a result of the increased focus on teaching quality and consumeristic relationships with students.
Many aspects of life can be and have been explored through a performance lens, and it has been argued for many decades that our everyday interactions have aspects of a theatrical performance. Specifically in the higher education teaching context, the academic and performer Lee Campbell (2019) has written about the role of performance in pedagogy, culminating in the publication of an edited volume on critical performative pedagogy. Zooming out from higher education, the renowned sociologist Erving Goffman devised the concept of dramaturgical analysis. He observed that people ābehaveā, or āactā, differently in different situations, and with different people, preserving a private presentation of self for the backstage space. Goffman (1956) outlined his ideas in his first book, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. In this chapter, we start from this premise that we present ourselves in different ways in different social contexts, and we look specifically at the teaching context. We will explore some of the key terms used throughout the book and attempt to define concepts which are relevant when considering performance aspects of a teacherās role.
Teaching as Performance or Teaching is Performance?
Teaching is about reaching people with your subject. Performance is about reaching people with your message.
Kate Nasser, Interview 3
In discussing teaching and performance, it is important to clarify precisely how we consider teaching and performance to be related: do we say teaching is (a) performance or do we just describe teaching as performance? What is the difference? As is evident by the topic of this book, we often tend to refer to almost anything as being a performance. A famous example is the quote from Shakespeareās As You Like It, in which Jacques begins a monologue with āAll the worldās a stage,ā characterising life as a play being performed by us, the actors. However, McAuley (2010) cautions against considering an ever-increasing number of scenarios and contexts to be performances. As Schechner (2013) points out, an important factor in determining whether something is deemed to be a performance is what cultural, social, and historical conventions count as performance. This means that what is performance is not static but changes over time and from culture to culture, and lines between what is performance and what is an everyday activity often become blurred. A contemporary example is the fast-paced and often dramatic world of politics: at the time of writing, the highest political office, the US President, is currently occupied by a former reality TV star.
It is unlikely that current social or cultural conventions, anywhere in the world, would categorise teaching as being performance. However, anything has the potential to be viewed as performance. Schechner (2013: 41) gives the example of maps as performance, explaining that, in their various forms, maps perform certain functions, such as depicting clear, but artificial, boundaries between nation states, or portraying the northern hemisphere with relatively bigger territories as compared to land masses in the southern hemisphere, showing the world from the preferred viewpoint of the colonial powers. Schechner concludes that as provides a useful way of viewing a particular topic through the lens of something else, without committing to a firm comparison between the two.
What the āasā says is that the object of study will be regarded āfrom the perspective ofā, āin terms ofā, āinterrogated byā a particular discipline of study.
(Schechner 2013: 42)
This is what is at the heart of this book: encouraging reflection on our teaching practice and performance; considering teaching from the perspective of performing arts; in terms of skills and techniques used by performers; interrogated by performance studies, all of which designate teaching as having elements of performance without describing the teacher inherently as a performer, an actor, or a sage-on-the-stage character.
What is Performance?
Returning to the point above about marketisation and consumerisation of higher education, the notion of performance draws our attention to standards, success, and potential consequences for substandard performance. In the arts, performance is about entertaining (an audience) and pursuing a creative endeavour. However, neither of these concepts of performance captures the essence of performance from the perspective of a teacher. The influential performance theorist and theatre director Richard Schechner (2003: 8) identifies several characteristics which are unique to performance, namely demonstration or showing of skills or talents, audience members, ordering of time sequences, and a high degree of self-awareness on the part of the performer. It is possible to see how this idea of performance can be used to frame a teacherās performance. Teachers simultaneously demonstrate their own skills of presentation, explanation, and so on, but they also guide their āaudienceā ā their students ā to learn new skills and to gain new knowledge. For any teacher who has planned a class, it is also apparent that time is never your friend, and it is important to consider carefully how long the different segments of the lesson will take, and how these interrelate. Finally, as teachers, we are encouraged to be reflective practitioners, casting a critical eye over our own practice both during class and afterwards in order to reflect-in-action and to reflect-on-action (Schƶn 1983) (see Chapter 2). This means we have a high degree of self-awareness.
In terms of the extent of performance and where it might arise, Schechner (2013: 31) identifies eight situations in which performances might occur:
1 in everyday life ā cooking, socialising, ājust livingā
2 in the arts
3 in sports and other popular entertainments
4 in business
5 in technology
6 in sex
7 in ritual ā sacred and secular
8 in play
Schechner acknowledges that this list is by no means exhaustive, and that many of the situations overlap and form integral parts of each other. He uses this list simply to highlight that performance is a ubiquitous construct, found everywhere, but that it is also difficult to define or to determine its limits and boundaries. For Fleming (2016), what distinguishes performance from everyday life (number 1 in Schechnerās list of situations) is the emphasis on reflection and awareness of self during the activity, in our case teaching. This means that we can move away from the more obvious notions of performance, such as standing on a stage and speaking in front of an audience, and focus instead on the self-awareness, self-reflection, and, in some ways, the vulnerabilities of the teacher. This, in essence, is where teaching meets performance.
What Does it Mean to Perform?
As we have seen from Schechnerās depiction of performance above, the act of performing occurs in a variety of ways, from the obvious performance on stage or screen, to performing roles at ceremonies or social events, to navigating performances in everyday life, such as performing a job role in the workplace. We are usually quite aware when we are performing, and we can quite easily spot the difference between ābeing ourselvesā and āplaying a roleā. Or is this always the case, particularly in the workplace, and even more specifically, in teaching?
Pause for Reflection:
Think about how you are as a person in everyday life and how you are when you are teaching? How do you think your friends and family would view you if they saw you in a teaching context? Would they find your everyday āpersonaā different from your teaching āpersonaā? Do you think you have a teaching (performing) persona?
The questions above aim to provoke reflection about who you are when you are ājust being youā ā if such a thing even exists ā and who you are when you are performing the role of a teacher. Friends and family members, who know me solely in a social, non-working/teaching context, have often remarked that they find the idea of me āstanding in front of a classā funny, interesting, intriguing, strange ā and other adjectives of choice. What I take from this is that they are used to seeing me (perform) in a particular context ā everyday life ā and so they find the idea of me performing the role of a teacher, which they know well from their own experiences of being taught themselves, funny,...