Beyond border walls and prison cells—carceral society is everywhere. In a time of mass incarceration, immigrant detention and deportation, rising forms of racialized, gendered, and sexualized violence, and deep ecological and economic crises, abolitionists everywhere seek to understand and radically dismantle the interlocking institutions of oppression and transform the world in which we find ourselves. These oppressions have many different names and histories and so, to make the impossible possible, abolition articulates a range of languages and experiences between (and within) different systems of oppression in society today.
Abolishing Carceral Society presents the bold voices and inspiring visions of today’s revolutionary abolitionist movements struggling against capitalism, patriarchy, colonialism, ecological crisis, prisons, and borders.
In the first of a series of publications, the Abolition Collective renews and boldly extends the tradition of “abolition-democracy” espoused by figures like W.E.B. Du Bois, Angela Davis, and Joel Olson. Through study and publishing, the Abolition Collective supports radical scholarly and activist research, recognizing that the most transformative scholarship is happening both in the movements themselves and in the communities with whom they organize.
Abolishing Carceral Society features a range of creative styles and approaches from activists, artists, and scholars to create spaces for collective experimentation with the urgent questions of our time.
Through essays, interviews, visual art, and poetry, each presented in an accessible manner, the work engages with the meaning, practices, and politics of abolitionism in a range of historical and geographical contexts, including: prison and police abolitionism, border abolition, decolonization, slavery abolitionism, antistatism, antiracism, labor organizing, anticapitalism, radical feminism, queer and trans politics, Indigenous people’s politics, sex worker organizing, migrant activism, social ecology, animal rights and liberation, and radical pedagogy.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on âCancel Subscriptionâ - itâs as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youâve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Abolishing Carceral Society an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Abolishing Carceral Society by in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Social Sciences & Criminology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
FROM SOUTH AFRICA TO INDIA,1 HONG KONG TO CHILE,2 CANADA to the United Kingdom,3 and California to Missouri and beyond,4 student protests worldwide are at a crossroads. In October 2015, South African students led the âFees Must Fallâ protests, which culminated in a weeks-long national shutdown that halted approximately 10 percent tuition increases.5 These were the largest protests since the 1976 Soweto Student Uprisings.6 University students led thousands in a march on the national capitol.7 In the Western Cape, students took over flagship universities, such as University of Cape Town (UCT) and Stellenbosch University (SU).8 They even attempted to shut down Cape Town International airport.9
Nearly a year later, students continue to protest and demand more than free education.10 They endure despite widespread suppression of protests, through expulsions and trumped-up charges.11 Assaults and property damage occurred from confrontations with security forces.12 Many security personnel were private contractors.13 South Africaâs university students have asked the critical question that underlies all student-led and education-focused protests, and that Californians and students across the United States must also ask ourselves: How far must we go? Must we focus on the more achievable, shorter-term project of transforming our schools? Or, must we focus on the more ambitious, longer-term project of remaking our societies?
The Rhodes Must Fall collective (RMF), which is overwhelmingly led by marginalized, Black university students, has demanded more than institutional âtransformation.â Instead, they have consistently demanded total âdecolonizationâ: a radical abolition and reimagination of entire social structures. RMF has refused shallow reforms to fundamentally colonial, Eurocentric, and anti-Black institutions. They have repeatedly called out universitiesâ corporate lip service and empty promises over twenty years of negligible change.14 They have highlighted the connections of universities to military-industrial complexes, and attacked the way that universities and Global North firms remain dependent upon the exploitation of Black labor. RMFâs radical demands and their strategy of aiming beyond academia has led the way in raising consciousness about South Africaâs and other postcoloniesâ negligible social and economic transformations. By addressing neoliberalization and corporatization of universities in a frame of colonial violence against Black and LGBTQ+ bodies, students have raised larger questions of neoliberal governance by white-owned, global capital.
RMF has consistently alleged that, in the current neocolonial/neoliberal system, wealthy, elected, multiracial elites have simply replaced the former, unelected, all-white, apartheid-era elites. Both pre- and post-apartheid governments are beholden to white-owned, global capital. Because of, and not in spite of, such radical, ambitious claims, RMF inspired South African students to demand more, protest longer, include more stakeholders, and ultimately achieve more of their goals. In doing so, they have highlighted the global predicament of neoliberalism and so-called postcolonialism, and they have significantly changed the conversations around not only education but also around public services, racism, democracy, and social movements. Other university students, like those in California and across the United States, have much to learn from RMF.
FROM âRHODES MUST FALLâ TO âFEES MUST FALLâ TO âTHE DEATH OF A DREAMâ
How, and how much, has RMF succeeded? While students have indisputably changed the conversation and won short-term victories, more than a year of direct actions, demonstrations, and occupations have endured increasing suppression. By the time of Octoberâs Fees Must Fall, most of South Africaâs universities had been primed by RMF for larger protests that would move beyond the confines of the universities and into the communities and towns around them. By 2015, South African students were exasperated by slow and exploitative university bureaucracies, as well as by elected but unresponsive Student Representative Councils (SRCs).
RMF formed in March 2015 when marginalized students led protests with a clear, immediate demand: removal of a statue to Cecil Rhodes from the center of UCTâs campus.15 RMFâs success with the statue, and their proudly radical and transgressive tactics, inspired and directly contributed to a renewal of other student protest groups.16 In April, Open Stellenbosch (OS) emerged.17 OS was led by students at the even more unequal and segregated Stellenbosch University (SU), located near Cape Town in Stellenboschâthe historic âcradle of apartheid.â18 OS demanded major reforms to actually address endemic institutional racism, beginning with all classes being available in English, not Afrikaans.19
In July, the Marikana Commission Report exonerated all government officials, exacerbating national tensions.20 In August, as the school year resumed, RMF seized the moment and escalated dramatically through evocative demonstrations about persistent anti-Blackness, evidenced by the Marikana Massacre.21 RMF highlighted negligible gains for Black students and South Africans with a transgressive campaign of graffiti- and performance art-based demonstrations that demanded students, administrators, and community members all âRemember Marikana,â largely by comparing it to the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre.22 Furthermore, RMF highlighted universitiesâ involvement, through board seats and investments, with Global North firms that remain dependent upon overwhelmingly Black labor for dangerous, underpaid, and degrading forms of laborâlike mining.
Backlash increased against students who supposedly should have been satisfied by the removal of UCTâs Rhodes Statue, and whose protests were increasingly disrupting business as usual. As graffiti and other forms of transgression increased, outspoken faculty began dismissing as âideological essentialisingâ RMFâs âattacks on liberalism.â23 Many white faculty and students refused to consider how or why students were becoming increasingly transgressive when faced with increasing oppression. RMFâs unashamedly pro-Black attacks on UCTâs anti-Blackness transgressed established norms of respectable, slow, and ineffective bureaucracy-based change, which the most marginalized students were no longer accepting.
Between August and October, drawing on the success and controversy of RMF and OS, many other universities and students increased their protests. Because of RMF, critiques increasingly became about anti-Blackness, white supremacy, Eurocentrism, abolition, decolonization, and radical change, instead of past acceptance of incremental change espoused by political parties.
With RMF and OS leading the way, university students educated the public on social systems of exploitation and oppression, both online through widely circulated documentaries and opinions, as well as in the streets.24 Performative, transgressive, and ostensibly radical tactics blazed a trail by aggressively denouncing the persistent Eurocentrism and anti-Blackness at ostensibly democratic and meritocratic institutions, like universities.
The targets of their protests included, but were not limited to:
⢠Increasing privatization and exclusivity of universities, especially the wealth and power of elite populations within academia;
⢠White supremacy and cultural hegemony, manifested through universitiesâ Eurocentric epistemologies, methodologies, monuments, language policies, and hiring practices;
⢠Outsourcing of service jobs, disproportionately impacting Black and women laborers;
⢠White-owned, global capitalist hegemony dependent upon connections between universities and Global North extractive, security, and financial...