Let’s step back from that ideal future we just outlined and start with an introduction to all the currents that led up to the Sustainable Development Goals—commonly known by the acronym “SDGs”—and the growing movement of companies applying them to their own business models.
To be honest, you don’t have to read this chapter to understand what comes after in our surveys of where businesses are, how they are measuring and managing their progress, and what are the best corporate practices around the SDGs that we have discovered. You could skip it and still learn about what is most important to your career or your business in light of the launch of the SDGs.
We’ll try not to get too wonky, but you know how it is when wading into the weeds of international treaties and conferences, or of the origins of intergovernmental organizations and such. And if you do pass by the “How we got here” section for now, and then have nagging questions about what this is all about, please come back to hear the full story later.
What are the SDGs?
First off, here’s a simple rundown of what the SDGs actually are—their structure, if you will: The Sustainable Development Goals are a “comprehensive, far-reaching and people-centered set of [17] universal and transformative Goals”1 for society that were jointly developed and agreed upon by the representatives of all United Nations (UN) member countries in the 2015 declaration “Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”.
The goals can be categorized as specifically addressing the earth’s biosphere, society as a whole, or the economic sphere.
The SDGs are numbered and listed in order of their agreed-upon priority, i.e. the most pressing are ending poverty (1) and hunger (2), while peace, justice, and strong institutions (16) and partnerships for the goals (17) are important but come later (though they, of course, can help in the achievement of higher priority goals).
And the goals have a deadline, the year 2030, when the UN targets achieving each of them under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
These goals were based on work done in a series of conferences that date back almost 50 years and were put into their final form in an inclusive UN consultation process that was held over five years. They were created by consensus and unanimously agreed upon by every UN member state.
Now it gets a little more complicated: Underneath the goals are 169 targets that elaborate on what they hope to achieve and 232 indicators that show how to measure progress. These targets and indicators are expressed at a country level, with common, standardized metrics that can be applied across all nations. In this, they act as a guide for countries on what they should be working on to improve internally and where they can create relevant policies to make progress on the goals.
The UN states that the “SDGs and targets are integrated and indivisible, global in nature and universally applicable, taking into account different national realities, capacities and levels of development and respecting national policies and priorities”.2 While the organization strives to support implementation of the goals, how countries will formulate policies and actions to achieve the SDGs is left up to them to decide for themselves. Also, they are non-binding. Each country determines its own ambition, and proposed follow-ups and review processes are voluntary and country-led. Though there are no obligations or penalties, voluntary national reviews are scheduled to be held every summer at the UN’s High-level Political Forum, the annual meeting in New York to assess progress on the UN’s efforts, where countries can choose to report on their advancement on the goals.
Over the course of the countdown to 2030, the UN will assess overall progress of the agenda internally, and the structure of the goals can be updated and evolve as lessons are learned. Practically speaking then, the purpose and value of SDGs is in being a kind of framework that supports a common understanding of how countries are performing on managing the most serious human questions of our age.
Every year, progress on each goal is being independently tracked and reported on by a partnership between the German foundation Bertelsmann Stiftung and the UN’s Secretariat of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, headed by renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs. Bertelsmann presents the performance of each country ranked in comparison with each other, with an analysis of their individual progress on every goal within their own borders.
And to be honest, as of 2020, countries individually and as a whole have been failing to make the necessary progress on the targets of the SDGs to achieve the goals by 2030. This recognition, only five years into the effort, should goad countries into upping their ambition and reaching beyond their borders through financing, new technology applications, capacity-building, and better trade and policies. Which leads us to the seventeenth and final goal: global partnership.
The seventeenth goal is considered essential to success in that it should bring “together Governments, civil society, the private sector, the UN system and other actors … mobilizing all available resources”.3 These partnerships are necessary to share knowledge and assist in practical implementation efforts, and to share the cost for achieving the goals by 2030, which is estimated to be between $5 trillion and $7 trillion according to the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).4
Currently there is an investment gap in developing countries of about $2.5 trillion. While a large percentage of that gap can be made up from sources within those countries, the remainder will have to come from private investors or from Overseas Direct Aid, which at present annual levels is at a tenth of what is required. UNCTAD has proposed that the gap can be closed by the partnership between the home countries of private investors, state-owned firms, and sovereign wealth funds, and host countries, transnational corporations, and multilateral development banks.5
In our research for this book, we have discovered that investors of all stripes—social impact investors, insurance fund managers, infrastructure funds, and more—are having real conversations about the opportunities found in investing in the SDGs and are actively and ambitiously creating targeted funds to do so. How quickly they may fill the gap we cannot say yet, but they see doing so as not only helping themselves to avoid business risks caused by failures to achieve the goals, but also as a chance to develop new profitable business opportunities based on them.
We have seen that such managers of capital have the interest and will to invest, and that at the same there are projects that want to be in investors’ pipelines, though it appears that there is some disconnect between the two sides that needs to be bridged. This is a matter of communication, expectations, and acceptance of risks, which will ultimately need to be explored, understood, and addressed to close that funding gap.
*****
While countries may be failing to move forward fast enough in their policies and actions, there are now businesses that, like such investors, are ahead in their efforts to align their strategies and operations with the opportunities and business cases for the SDGs. That is what this book is about, and we will show you how industry leaders, backed by enlightened capital, are making sustainability a priority and driving the implementation and success of the SDGs.
And to be honest, this is not necessarily a new trend—there has been an acceptance of sustainability as being a powerful tool for businesses to improve their operations dating back to at least the 1990s. It is just now, with the launch of the SDGs, that the importance and uses of sustainability thinking have become easier to recognize and discuss in the public sphere.
So, let’s see how we got here.