Part 1
Intimate Lives Chapter 1
Female Birthing Customs and Beliefs
Anne Cameron
In the eighteenth century, every aspect of conception, pregnancy and childbirth was suffused with social rituals. Scholarly research has illuminated these practices in early modern England and continental Europe, but comparatively little has been written on the folklore of birth and pregnancy in Scotland, first-hand evidence of which is extremely difficult to uncover.1 Childbirth was a female province to which men were only admitted in exceptional circumstances; consequently, birthing practices are scarcely mentioned in menâs journals and correspondence, and, at least until the mid eighteenth century, Scottish women rarely had the leisure or ability to record their own experiences. Drawing upon scattered references in contemporary diaries and letters, proscriptive allusions to âidle superstitionsâ in eighteenth and nineteenth-century medical treatises, and nineteenth and early twentieth-century compendia of folklore, this chapter aims to explore some of the primary rituals associated with childbirth and post-birth celebrations involving mothers and their midwives, and to suggest how they may have changed over the eighteenth century and beyond. While many of these practices were observed across Scotland, and indeed throughout Europe, others remained peculiar to certain localities until large-scale migration from the Highlands to the Lowlands began to blur regional distinctions in the later eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Similarities and differences in the observance of customs across the social spectrum are much harder to identify, however, as these tend to be obscured by the nature of the sources â whereas personal references to birthing customs stem mainly from the pens of the elite, references gathered from other sources probably refer implicitly to the lower classes.
The prayers, protective amulets and ritual practices described may or may not have afforded tangible practical benefits, but they held tremendous psychological significance for midwives and their clients.2 As Jacqueline Musacchio has observed, âthe contemporary belief in sympathetic magic and the mediating force of specific objects and rituals promised a greater personal control over pregnancy and birth than was medically possible at that timeâ.3 While labour might be protracted, and excruciatingly so, most deliveries were uncomplicated, with a favourable outcome. Accordingly, the comfort and reassurance of familiar and trusted rituals helped sustain expectant women during their ordeal, whilst a safe deliverance reinforced the purported efficacy of such practices. If the baby was disfigured or stillborn, or the mother died in childbirth, the blame could readily be placed on supernatural agents, such as fairies.
Preparations for Labour, Expediting Delivery, and Tending to Mother and Child
Until well into the nineteenth century, pregnant women throughout Britain were almost always delivered in their own homes.4 Vagrants and those taken in labour whilst travelling had little choice but to give birth wherever they happened to be, but, as the Glasgow Mercury reported in 1791, their plight sometimes moved strangers to offer shelter:
During the great fall of snow on Monday seâennight, a poor woman was taken in labour on the Greenock road, near Crosshill, and delivered of a child. The people at Crosshill took her in, and humanely accommodated her with a bed, and a contribution was immediately made by the travellers in the house.5
Well-to-do families might engage a midwife to live-in as the pregnancy progressed, thus in 1756, George Ridpath noted that the Minister of Morebattleâs wife, who was nearing full term, âstill keeps afoot, but has the midwife with herâ.6 More usually, however, an expectant father would hurry to fetch the local midwife when labour commenced, coining the Scots expression âto go at midwife-gallopâ, or at full speed.7 Along the way, he apprized his wifeâs female friends and neighbours, collectively known as âgossipsâ, that their presence was also required. Diaries and correspondence rarely reveal how many women assembled on these occasions, but the number probably varied with the size of the community and the personal circumstances of the mother-to-be. In England, six women might attend; in Orkney, too, there were âsometimes as many as half a dozenâ.8 On one occasion, John Galtâs fictional parish midwife found that âyoung and old were there ⊠widows and grannies giving advice, and new-married wives sitting in the expectation of getting insightâ.9 Yet when the wife of Glasgow businessman and manufacturer, Robert Govane, gave birth in 1807, âwe had no person with us but the Mid-wife, and Mrs Kemp, who in some degree forced herself upon us, but she is a fine Body, and was really very usefulâ.10
While also assisting the midwife and acting as witnesses to the birth, the gossipsâ role was to comfort and encourage the labouring woman. Understandably fearful of labour, many women craved the reassuring presence of their mothers and sisters at this time.11 Mary Stewart Mackenzieâs two sisters travelled to Brahan Castle to be with her, and her mother, Lady Seaforth, promised that âif you have any wish for me ⊠I will go to you at any timeâ. Mary Carlyle was considered âabsolutely necessary to her sister when she lay inâ, and Mrs Dawson travelled from Stitchell to Glasgow to attend a niece âwho, in the midst of strangers, has lost her husband lately, and is at the point of lying-inâ.12
In Scotland, as elsewhere in Europe, husbands were barred from the lying-in chamber, yet there were occasional exceptions.13 Expecting her first child, Mary Walker, wife of the Minister of Dundonald, went into labour on 8 September 1740. Her husband, Thomas, recorded that she âbeing very uneasie all night, [I] slept lit[t]le, read throw the Day & visited my Wife now & thenâ.14 Thomasâs sister had previously endured a perilous labour and a stillbirth, which had affected him greatly, and may have made him particularly anxious for access to his wife. Happily, at 3.30 a.m. on 9 September âit pleased G[od] to give my Wife a safe Delivery of a Daughterâ.15 Though generally excluded from the intimate proceedings, husbands might remain in or near the house and receive moral support from male companions, just as their wives drew encouragement from the gossips in the birthing chamber.16 Two friends kept company with Thomas Walker during his wifeâs labour, and Walker offered similar support to Richard Cunningham, Minister of Symington âwhile his Spouse was cryingâ.17
It was important to secure a warm, private space for the delivery, and poorer women who lacked a separate bedroom might achieve this by isolating the bed (basic box beds, which were enclosed by curtains, would be amenable to this).18 In early modern France, a stable was used to avoid having to clean the house afterwards, while Russian women gave birth in the village bathhouse.19 Mary Mackie, the wife of an Aberdeenshire innkeeper, usually appropriated a spare room, but once had to be delivered âin our own bed closet, the room that we generally use for that purpose being occupied by Mr Taylor, hose merchantâ.20 Whereas Mr Taylor was a paying guest, oneâs sleeping husband could more readily be turned out, as was Thomas Walkerâs experience in 1747.21
It was common throughout Europe for the midwife to close all doors and windows in the room to retain warmth and repel evil influences. In some parts of Scotland, the curtains were also drawn to block out sun and moonlight, it being considered unlucky for either to shine upon the baby.22 The fire â a crucial element in the rituals performed to safeguard mother and child after delivery â was stoked to keep the room warm and to brew the caudle, a mixture of alcohol, sugar and spices to fortify the labouring woman for the hours ahead. Upper-class families purchased wine specially for this purpose, while at the opposite end of the social scale, the manservant of George Home of Kimmerghame got from Home âsome seck [,] his wife being in travellâ.23
There is some evidence to suggest that midwives prepared and administered herbal remedies to their clients. After suffering a series of miscarriages in the 1690s, for example, the Countess of Panmure consulted various midwives for advice. One, Sarah Inglis, supplied both the Countess and other Scottish noblewomen with ointments and preparations.24 Remedies purporting to ease or hasten childbirth were passed amongst female friends and copied into their recipe books for future reference. It is difficult to determine their efficacy, but personal endorsements suggest that women set great store by them. One recipe to prevent miscarriage in a notebook owned by Mary Harrison carries the assurance that Mrs Greenhill took it âwith Such Sucksess, that she had many Children, & was with child 39 times; which I have heard her say my selfâ.25 Women similarly passed on...