Part I
The Story So Far
1
Prior to 1961
Until the early twentieth century, the only fact known with much certainty about the early years in the life of El Greco was that he was born in Crete. He himself stated as much – indeed, not without some pride,1 though with the passing of time and as he settled into life in his new homeland these references became less frequent2 – in at least twelve of his signed works: ‘Made by Domenikos Theotokopoulos the Cretan’ (Δομήνικος Θεοτοκόπουλος ὁ Κρὴς ἐποίει).3 Another piece of information, from a Spanish source, referring also to the early period in the life of El Greco, had been insufficiently noted. This information is contained in three verses from one of the four sonnets dedicated to El Greco by the Trinitarian monk Fray Hortensio Félix Paravicino y Arteaga (1580–1633), a celebrated rhetorician and poet of the period (Plate 1).4 The last three lines of the sonnet composed by Paravicino for the tomb of El Greco in Toledo read as follows:
Creta le dió la vida y los pinceles,
Toledo mejor patria, donde empieza
a lograr, con la muerte, eternidades.
The lines are open to more than one reading, depending on where one places the first comma: after pinceles or after Toledo. As punctuated here, mejor patria is the object of dió: literally ‘Crete gave him life and paintbrushes; Toledo [gave him] a better home, where through death he began to attain eternity’. If, however, we omit the comma after pinceles, leaving the enjambment of the first to second verses, and place it instead after Toledo, the mejor patria stands in apposition to Toledo, and the meaning changes: ‘Crete gave him life, and Toledo – a better home – [gave him] paintbrushes etc.’ There can be little doubt that the first reading is both metrically and syntactically more satisfying, besides yielding a better meaning. Paravicino was hardly likely to claim that Domenikos, who arrived in Spain in 1577 at the age of thirty-six or thirty-seven, learnt the art of painting in Toledo. Remarkably, in the past many El Greco scholars preferred this second reading.5 Today, however, particularly since the discovery of documents concerning the Cretan period in his life, this interpretation has been abandoned.6 Paravicino’s statement that El Greco learnt to paint in Crete acquires more weight if we bear in mind the fact that the source of his information was in all probability El Greco himself. We know, for instance, that Paravicino was a close friend and admirer of El Greco, and even had his portrait painted by him in 1609, today in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and described by William Jordan as ‘one of the great portraits in the history of art’.7
In 1903, the discovery of archive material threw new light on the precise place of birth of El Greco. At a trial of the Inquisition in Toledo (1582), where a seventeen-year-old Greek boy by the name of Michel Rizo Carcandil (the original Greek name may have been Chalkokondylis or Korkondeilos) was accused of being a crypto-Muslim (morisco), El Greco assisted as interpreter. At the trial he identified himself as born in the city of Candia, Crete (‘natural de la ciudad de Candia’),8 the capital of the island, today known as Heraklion (it is worth pointing out, however, that the name Candia in Western sources was generally applied to the island as a whole). Later, in 1927, further archive material revealed the year of his birth. During the course of protracted litigation between El Greco and the trustees of the Hospital of Charity, Illescas, concerning payment for an altarpiece he had painted for its church, El Greco twice stated, on 31 October and 4 November 1606, that he was sixty-five years old (‘de hedad de sesenta y cinco anos’).9 In other words, he must have been born in 1541 or, at the very earliest, between 4 November and 31 December 1540. In accepting his statement as fact, we have to assume of course that El Greco himself knew exactly how old he was – a state of affairs that cannot always be taken for granted at this period.
This limited but valuable information regarding his date and place of birth, and his apprenticeship as an artist, is all we can glean from the wealth of published material from Spanish archives, which nevertheless shed considerable light on the life and career of El Greco after his arrival in Spain, from 2 July 1577 until his death on 7 April 1614. For the first half of his life – that is, the formative Cretan and Italian periods (1540/1–1577) – our knowledge was frustratingly limited.10 It should come as no surprise, therefore, that until just two decades ago scholars tended to pass over El Greco’s Cretan period in somewhat embarrassed haste, despite the significance it surely has for an assessment of his personality and art. What is more surprising is that earlier scholars rarely took the trouble to consult the available accounts of Crete in the sixteenth century and the so-called Cretan Renaissance. With the exception of routine comparisons of El Greco’s style with the art of Byzantium and of post-Byzantine Crete, most commentators tended to view his homeland as a remote, exotic and somewhat unlikely location, which historical accident had appointed as birthplace of the great painter. Moreover, there was a tendency to date El Greco’s arrival in the West as early as possible so as to extend the period of his apprenticeship and artistic career in Venice and Rome, though efforts to reconstruct this apprenticeship and artistic activity remained for the most part guesswork.11 The main emphasis, naturally, was placed on his Spanish period, which was also the best documented. But this partial and somewhat misleading account inevitably led to a limited view of the personality of the Cretan artist, which virtually turned him into a Spaniard.12 There is no denying, of course, that El Greco’s thirty-seven years in Spain were the most creative of his career, when he produced works that earned him the ‘eternity’ foreseen in Paravicino’s verses. However, it is also clear that when in far-off Spain El Greco made a conscious effort to preserve his Greek identity and not be totally assimilated into his adopted environment. This is demonstrated not only by the signatures on his paintings, all of which are in Greek (though he knew Latin, Italian and Spanish, and lived for a total of forty-seven years in a primarily Latin-speaking environment),13 but also by the fact that he was known as ‘El Greco’ (an appellation that he formally adopted),14 that he had many Greek books in his library, and that his circle of friends included Greeks of Toledo until the last years of his life.15
Notes