1 Introduction
Social Media Discourse, (Dis)Identifications and Diversities
Sirpa LeppÀnen, Samu KytölÀ, Elina Westinen and Saija Peuronen
The focus in this volume is on social media discourse, (dis)identifications and diversities. It demonstrates how particular ways of mobilizing verbal, discursive and other semiotic resources serve as means for identity work (Blommaert, 2003; Bucholtz, 2003), involving acts, processes and practices of (dis)identification as essential aspects of sociality in social media. It will also illustrate how such social action also increasingly engages with a range of diversities in social media.
In this introductory chapter we present the focus and aims of this volume and introduce the case studies included in it. In addition, we clarify the key coordinates of this research. First, we describe the sociolinguistic and discourse-ethnographic approach taken in this book to the investigation of social media discourse practice. Second, we discuss social media as informal and interest-driven activity spaces (LeppÀnen, KytölÀ, JousmÀki, Peuronen, & Westinen, 2014) with their emergent orders of normativity (Silverstein, 1976; Blommaert, 2010; Varis & Wang, 2011) in which social media participants, drawing on particular semiotic resources and in the context of specific activities and interactions, engage with (dis)identification. Third, we review the ways in which identity and identity work have been theorized and investigated in previous language-oriented work on social media activities and interactions and, with the help of recent critical discussion of identity theory, give an overall idea of the dimensions involved in identity work in social media, emphasizing its basis in the choices human actors make, under particular situated sociocultural, discursive and normative conditions, and the multiple dimensions and scales (potentially) involved in identity work. Fourth, this chapter discusses how, like identity, diversity can also be seen as a complex and multifaceted notion that ranges from the diversity of communicative sites and contexts, to participants and their activities, interactions and communicative repertoires and resources. Our discussion of the key theoretical coordinates of the volume will help the reader to place the empirical cases presented in the book, along with their takes on social media, identity work and diversity, within the conceptual space they demarcate. Finally, we highlight the general ethical guidelines in research on social media.
The Volume in a Nutshell
In this volume, we argue that, whereas there is a growing body of sociolinguistic studies focusing on identity in the globalizing late modern world (Brubaker & Cooper, 2000; Androutsopoulos & Georgakopoulou, 2003; Bucholtz & Hall, 2004; Blommaert, 2005; KrzyĆŒanowski & Wodak, 2008), identity is also a timely topic in the specific context of digital social media. While acknowledging that the digital divide is still very much a global reality, with the majority of the worldâs population living without the internet and thus without social media (P. Norris, 2001; Schradie, 2011), this volume argues that for a large portion of the worldâs population1 social media serve as important sites for everyday life, as ways of âbeing in the worldâ, interacting with others, sharing and organizing information and collaboratively constructing culture, both in ways that resemble and intertwine with ways predating and spanning the internet, and in completely new ways.
Broadly, the volume approaches the study of social media from the perspectives of sociolinguistics and discourse-ethnographic studies. In doing so, it contributes to an emergent tradition of language and literacy oriented research in which identity work is increasingly a key topic (see, e.g., Thurlow & Mroczek, 2011a; Tannen & Trester, 2013; Barton & Lee, 2013; Seargeant & Tagg, 2014a). In this research domain, identity work in social media is also beginning to be acknowledged as ânormalâ and mundane practice instead of as something exceptional, exotic or particular to only specific social or age groups, as was sometimes the case in the early days of internet research (see Crystal, 2004; Herring, 2008).
This volume shows, first, how social media participants, via multi-semiotic and discursive means, engage in identity work in the sociocultural contexts of particular social media, networks, affinity groups or communities of practice. As is explained in more detail in the following, such identity work can, theoretically, involve a number of different kinds of processes and practices (and their combinations), each of which relate to particular possibilities and ways of understanding, orienting to, and constructing âidentity.â These possibilities and ways can be clarified with reference to the critical revision of recent identity theories suggested by Brubaker and Cooper (2000, pp. 17â20), the main aspects of which are the following:
- categorical and/or relational identification of oneself and/or others by oneself/others,
- categorical and/or relational disidentification of oneself and/or others by oneself/others,
- self-understanding and social location and
- commonality, connectedness and groupness.
Such a multidimensional framework is helpful in conceptualizing the possibilities of and choices made in identity work in social media. As shown in the following, it also provides us with a useful perspective from which to pinpoint and discuss the particular orientations taken in the individual studies included in this volume, and thus highlight the particular dimensions of identity work they analytically focus on.
Second, another key aim of the volume, and a theme running through all of the empirical cases included in it, is diversities. In this volume, diversity is approached as a complex, plural notion that involves social diversity as well as linguistic and semiotic diversityâdiversity of participants, diversity in identity work in, between and across social formations, and diversity of resources of expression, communication and action. Diversity is thus seen as something pertaining to contexts, individuals and groups, as well as to discourse and social practice. Diversity can also involve the kind of complexity that has recently been characterized as superdiversity (Arnaut, 2012/2016; Blommaert, 2015; Meissner, 2015).
The twelve case studies included in this volume focus on different social media contexts involving participants from different corners of the world and exemplifying diverse online activities and interactions. These studies will tease out some of the particularities with which participants in social media verbalize and visualize themselves and others into being as particular kinds of social actors with particular kinds of social connections, allegiances and affinities. While doing so, the contributions in this book also demonstrate the value and efficacy of their analytic tools and methods, provided by sociolinguistics, ethnography, discourse studies, the study of multimodality and the ways in which these offer the kind of precision and sensitivity needed for a nuanced description of the semiotic resources mobilized in identity work in social media and the meanings they help to generate.
The 12 Case Studies in this Book
This volume is organized into two main sections. The first part is labeled âIdentifications and disidentifications with othersâ and the second one âIdentifications of the selfâ, according to the primary focus of their analyses of identity work.
Part 1 begins with an exploration of a transgressive gender category by Halonen and LeppĂ€nen. Their focus is on social media as sites for constructing, negotiating and contesting gender and sexuality. Drawing on fictional short stories aimed at girls and young women as their data, they analyze the intricate ways in which the stories construct and critically investigate the category of the so-called pissis girls, a particular version of âbad young femininityâ in contemporary Finland. Their analysis shows how the discursive strategy of excess is used as a means for conducting nuanced sociocultural analysis and for both identifying with and disidentifying from the social category.
In his chapter, KytölĂ€ examines popular discourses on nationalism in the context of web forum discussions of menâs national football teams and that of Finland, in particular. He focuses on the âbanal nationalistâ tradition of the playback and singing of national anthems before international football matches, exploring the discursive and semiotic strategies online discussants draw on to categorize, represent and contest nationalism. His analysis shows how ambivalent stances emerge among football followers on the different aspects of ethnic diversification of national teams in a culture characterized by growing mobility and diversity. Moreover, he addresses the ways in which football followers utilize ambivalent sarcasm, satire and jocularity in their identification and disidentification processes pertaining to diversifying national teams and even particular players with multiethnic family backgrounds and transcultural life histories.
The chapter by Zhukova Klausen deals with the complexity of transnational belonging in a Denmark-based Russian-speaking discussion forum. Guided by its orientation to (dis)identification as subjectivation, the chapter looks at how diverse discursive and semiotic resources mediate identification and disidentification practices through which belonging is constructed. It examines ways in which participants in computer-mediated social interaction mobilize, on one hand, psy(chology) discourses and practices that construct transnational living as problematic and, on the other hand, resist this kind of problematization and refuse to identify themselves with the proposed transnational subjectivity.
Van Nuenen and Varis investigate the practices whereby a popular, professional American travel blogger is assigned with an expert identity. Looking at the construction of expertise both algorithmically and discursively, their analysis shows how the bloggerâs identity is a discursive composite of two rolesâthat of a travel expert and of a life coach. Furthermore, they demonstrate how the âenregistermentâ of expertise can be usefully conceptualized and analyzed in terms of the Goffmanian notion of âteamâ, whereby identity construction can be seen as a âteam effortâ to which not only the travel blogger but also his blogger peers and his varied audiences contribute.
The chapter by Bortoluzzi discusses practices and processes of self- and other-(dis)identification in the context of online popular forensics relating to a recent murder case in Italy. Using participant interviews as her material, the author concentrates on analyzing how social media participants, sharing the belief that the murder suspects were innocent, engaged in processes of identifying themselves as members of what became to be seen as a âpro-innocentâ community, as well as disidentified themselves from those who took the opposite view, the âpro-guiltâ community. Of particular interest in the study are the discursive formulations of empathy and dyspathy that contribute to these processes, and the intricate ways in which these are enacted both online and offline.
To conclude the first part, Georgakopoulou investigates two sets of data, one featuring the interactions of an ethnically and linguistically diverse group of young Facebook friends and the other YouTube commentaries on a spoof video based on an incident of a male politician attacking two female members of parliament, originally shown live in Greek TV news. In focus in her analysis are processes of alignment at the intersection of social media usersâ interactional practices and the affordances of participation offered by social media. Drawing on small stories analysis and the study of interaction, she focuses on two systematic interactional patterns of doing alignment, ritual appreciation and knowing participation. Overall, her findings advance our understanding of how participants manage social relations of (dis)identification in the interplay between media affordances, actual communication choices and participation frameworks.
The second part of the book, âIdentifications of the Selfâ, begins with a chapter by Tagg and Seargeant. Drawing on a questionnaire-based survey of Facebook users as their data, the authors examine the extent to which peopleâs online identifications are shaped by the social roles they inhabit offline, as well the extent to which they are aware of the likely trajectories and potential accessibility of their postings, and thus which social roles they deem relevant in the online context. The chapter thus highlights how offline social roles are made relevant in social media contexts as an interactional resource for identity work and relationship building as well as how usersâ perceptions of their roles (and the social expectations which typically accompany them) may potentially shape or constrain what they post and how they manage their online communication.
The chapter by Georgalou looks at the role of time and temporality in identification in social media interaction. More specifically, in a case study, based on a more extensive discourse-ethnographic investigation of Greek Facebook users, she examines how the user discursively constructs himself as a âchronological beingâ, positions himself vis-Ă -vis time and makes aspects of time relevant in his Facebook interactions. On the basis of her analysis, Georgalou argues that the construction of age and time identity is essentially an interactive and collaborative task and that identifications with cultural elements, such as music, constitute powerful indices of affiliation, belonging, commonality, alignment, and groupness.
Age identification is also central in Nishimuraâs chapter. With the help of both a corpus-based analysis of pronominal choices and a close qualitative linguistic and textual analysis, including features associated with ârole languageâ, the author examines blogs by senior Japanese men and women. While positing that two conceptual identitiesâthe blogger and the characterâare relevant in the analysis of such blogs, the author demonstrates diversity in blogging styles, highlighting how both gender and age have an impact on the particular ways in which senior bloggers compose their texts.
Lehtonen also engages with questions of gender and age. Her particular focus is on the close analysis of stories by Finnish âbroniesâ (a portmanteau of brother and pony), adult young men who are interested in the My Little Pony franchise and find it important for their identity construction. She examines the intersections of gender, sexuality and age in these fansâ brief life narratives posted on a discussion forum, and argues that, while bronies do gender in nonnormative ways in the context of social media, age and sexuality should also be mapped in order to understand the overall picture. Her discussion showcases that, despite their shared bronyhood and fandom, the participants also exhibit a great deal of diversity in their identification processes.
Focusing on YouTube instructional videos on Pidgin (Hawaiâi Creole) and Konglish (Korean English), Higgins, Furukawa and Lee explore the production of social media content to find out whether and to what degree social media can provide new affordances for representing and valorizing sociolinguistic diversity by studying how video producers (dis)identify with mainstream metapragmatic messages, or ideological statements about language. On the basis of their analysis they argue that the videos end up legitimizing these two marginalized and stigmatized languages as linguistic systems in their own right, and challenging the valorization of mainstream varieties of hegemonic languages, thereby contributing to the value accorded to multilingualism.
In the final chapter of the volume, Westinen explores the multi-semiotic and polycentric construction of the self as Other in social media, in the specific context of Finnish hip hop. By drawing on Finnish rap music videos by artists of immigrant origin as data, she discusses the ways in which these âBlackâ artists and entertainers negotiate their role in society, and in the hip-hop scene. They engage in various (dis)identification processes, some of which draw on (yet also run counter to) âtraditionalâ identity categories such as ethnicity, and on gendered and racialized stereotypes of âBlackâ, African men to raise awareness and tolerance, thereby exhibiting an âin-your-faceâ type of Otherness.
A Sociolinguistic and Discourse-Ethnographic Approach to Digital Discourse
The vantage point taken in this volume and its case studies can be broadly defined as a sociolinguistic and discourse-ethnographic approach to digital discourse. Such an approach has been highlighted in online-ethnographic work, where we can see a shift from solely medium-related research, focusing on the technologies, software, platforms and sites to user-related approaches, to what people actually doâwhy and how they adopt and appropriate linguistic, semiotic and discursive resources, and what discursive and sociocultural meanings and effects are generated thereby. The specific sociolinguistic orientation in such studies is manifest in the ...