PART ONE
The Emerging Trends
1
Women and Proprietorship in the 1980s
Over recent years the position of women in the economy has attracted considerable attention (Amsden, ed., 1980; West, ed., 1982; Joseph, 1983). In many ways this reflects their growing participation in the labour market and the success of the womenâs movement in focusing attention upon gender-related inequalities. But despite recent debates, many issues remain unexplored. The actual working experiences of women, for example, have not been systematically and thoroughly investigated although a number of studies have been recently undertaken (McNally, 1979; Pollert, 1981; Cavendish, 1982; Coyle, 1984). Discussions of womenâs subordination, moreover, have often been theoretically orientated and unsubstantiated by detailed empirical inquiry. At the same time, an emphasis upon working women as employees has led to the neglect of those who are employers and who run their own businesses. This book is intended to help redress this imbalance.
The neglect of women in studies of the workplace is well illustrated in the contents of many standard texts on industrial behaviour (Miller and Form, 1964; Burns, ed., 1969; Fox, 1971). In most cases, women are either totally excluded from consideration or they are assumed to behave in much the same way as men. The findings of industrial social research are almost entirely based upon the study of men within male-dominated industries and occupations and these have then provided the information upon which industrial studies have developed as academic and applied disciplines. Thus, it is investigations of men in industries such as coal mining (Dennis, Henriques and Slaughter, 1969), shipbuilding (Brown et al., 1972), printing (Cannon, 1967) and car assembly (Goldthorpe et al., 1968) which provide the âhard dataâ for general theories about all workersâ attitudes and behaviour. These observations, furthermore, have then often been related to discussions of family relationships, leisure patterns and life-styles (Dennis, Henriques and Slaughter, 1969, Goldthorpe et al., 1968). As a result, women â both inside and outside paid employment â appear as highly marginal figures. If women have been studied at work it has been either explicitly stated or implicitly assumed â certainly until quite recently â that their attitudes and behaviour differ little from men. Indeed, this view is evident from the very beginnings of industrial social research, the classic example of which is the much-quoted Hawthorne Investigation conducted in the United States during the 1930s (Roethlisberger and Dickson, 1939). In this study many of the work teams were women but the researchers gave little consideration to the possibility that employeesâ gender could affect their attitudes to work, social relationships and workplace behaviour. As Brown has suggested in his discussion of key themes within industrial sociology,
the body of research which attempts to explore the relationship between such factors as supervision, participation, informal social groups, and productivity, morale and acceptance of change, does not really consider, though it does report, the sex of the workers who were the subjects of the investigations as being any sort of limitation on the generality of the conclusions âŚ
My argument ⌠is not that men are so different that no generalisations, or accounts of genetic social processes in industrial situations, can possibly be true for both sexes; rather that the possible significance of the different social situations which men and women are in, by virtue of their gender, both within and outside the factory (and these can change), must always be considered in evaluating any research which it is argued has general implications. (1976, p. 26)
It is only recently that researchers, and particularly feminists, have begun to conduct studies of the experiences of women as these are shaped by male-dominated control structures within industrial organizations and, outside of work, by the general institutions and values of capitalism (Purcell, 1979; Herzog, 1980; Wajcman, 1983). These offer an empirical or factual corrective to the more abstract themes which have characterized many Marxist debates about the position of women in capitalist society. Women as employees, then, after much neglect are now attracting the attention of social researchers.
However, little is known of the experiences of women as employers and as owner-managers of business enterprises. While anthropologists have studied the position of women traders in non-industrialized countries (Caplan, ed., 1978) there has been an almost complete neglect of the contribution that women make to the formation and growth of businesses, particularly those of a small-scale, in the advanced capitalist societies (see Chapter 2). In view of the importance of small businesses as providers of employment, goods and services in the Western economies of the 1980s, this is a significant omission; particularly since women contribute to the process of business formation and growth in at least two major ways.
First, married women often provide a variety of hidden and unpaid services to their husbandsâ businesses during the crucial start-up period. As we have discussed elsewhere, without this largely unrecognized contribution many male-owned enterprises would not get off the ground (Scase and Goffee, 1980a, 1980b, 1982). Self-employed men, for instance, can be heavily dependent upon their wivesâ efforts for undertaking a wide range of clerical and administrative duties. Accordingly, these married women are often forced to give up their paid jobs and to abandon their careers in order to underwrite the efforts of their âself-madeâ husbands. Economically, socially and psychologically, therefore, the wives of small businessmen are often subordinated to the needs of their husbands. Further, because these men devote such a high proportion of their time and energy to their businesses, their wives are often compelled to cope single-handedly with domestic chores, including those of child-rearing and household budgeting. This is often with limited financial resources since these, too, may be stretched by the start-up requirements of the business. Unfortunately, there is little detailed information about the specific dynamics involved in these processes. There are, for example, no systematic data on the nature of entrepreneurial families, the formation of conjugal roles, and the ways in which business formation and growth are shaped by negotiations between husbands and wives. There is even less information on the attitudes and behaviour of business ownersâ wives and the ways in which they respond to their unpaid work and domestic roles. The entrepreneurial family, then, may be considered to be of considerable interest if only because, as a unit of economic production, it possesses features which are quite distinct from the ânormalâ family which primarily functions as a unit of consumption.
There is, however, a second and more direct way in which women contribute to the formation and growth of small businesses; that is, by starting their own enterprises. But, again, little is known about the processes involved (Goffee and Scase, 1982b, 1983a, 1983c; Goffee, Scase and Pollack, 1982). Feminists, for instance, have shown little interest, if only because of a belief that business ownership sustains an economic system which maintains the subordination of women by men. Accordingly, there has been hardly any discussion of proprietorship as a possible avenue whereby women can overcome their subordination within the family, the workplace and in society as a whole. Generally, feminists argue that the personal benefits which can be derived from proprietorship do not improve the general conditions experienced by most women. Many argue that individual strategies of âself-determinationâ through proprietorship are contrary to many of the central ideals of sisterhood and do not offer a realistic alternative to collective action (Novarra, 1980). Consequently, because of the widespread acceptance of this argument the socioeconomic processes associated with female proprietorship have been neglected. How, for instance, do specifically gender-related experiences affect women who start their own businesses? This is an important question if only because the economic conditions of the 1980s may be leading to an increase in the number of women embarking upon proprietorial careers. If there are a number of factors contributing to this trend, there would seem to be three which are of particular importance: those of high unemployment, job dissatisfaction and the development of new technology.
With high levels of long-term unemployment in various âfemaleâ sectors of the economy (Sinfield, 1981; West, ed., 1982), proprietorship is becoming an important means of employment for many women. Those who are economically marginalized because of the lack of opportunities for paid employment may have no option but to start their own businesses as a source of earnings (Goffee and Scase, 1983a). But even those who are gainfully employed may be increasingly attracted to entrepreneurship because of the experience of various forms of workplace deprivation. Because of their concentration in lowly skilled and low-paid occupations, a considerable proportion of women have little opportunity for meaningful job satisfaction (Wainwright, 1978; Webb, 1982). Even the small minority of those who are engaged in more economically and psychologically rewarding managerial and professional occupations are likely to encounter gender-related prejudices which can heighten their levels of stress and limit their career prospects (Hennig and Jardim, 1979; Silverstone and Ward, eds, 1980; Cooper and Davidson, 1982). If, then, as various studies have shown, a dissatisfaction with paid employment can often encourage men to start their own businesses (MacKenzie, 1973; Bechhofer et al., 1974b; Scase and Goffee, 1980a) the office and shopfloor experiences of women are likely to have similar effects (Goffee and Scase, 1982b). Finally, as recent experience in the United States suggests, the development of new micro-electronic technology of the sort that can be used in the home is offering new possibilities for the formation of small businesses among both men and women (see Chapter 2). With the relevant skills, many women are now able to trade at home as the self-employed providers of a wide range of administrative, financial and technical services.
In the 1980s, then, an increasing number of women are likely to start their own businesses (Boissevain, 1980; US Small Business Administration, 1982). Because many will have been in either full-time or part-time paid employment, they will have often acquired skills which are useful for business start-up. In the service sector, for example, where most women are employed, practical skills can be more important for starting a small business than access to financial resources (Goffee and Scase, 1982b, 1983b). A very large proportion of small firms in the service sector begin on a very limited scale, often utilizing domestic premises and the proprietorsâ own skills and the only finance required for such ventures is obtained from personal savings (Scase and Goffee, 1980a). Such a pattern of small business start-up has been encouraged by the growth of the âinformalâ economy which during the economic recession of the past decade has provided a context within which women â as well as men â can, on a limited scale, âexperimentâ with business proprietorship (Pahl, 1980). In Britain, the United States and in several other industrial countries, there has been a tendency to substitute the âinformalâ, the âhouseholdâ and the âcashâ production of goods and services for those produced within the âformalâ economy (Gershuny, 1978). It seems reasonable to expect, therefore, that as unemployment among women continues to grow, many will increasingly search for ways of earning a means of living through these âinformalâ and âcashâ patterns of trading. This, in turn, can provide a springboard for legitimate business start-up and the longer-term acquisition of entrepreneurial talents. In these ways, then, more and more women are likely to start their own businesses, even though they are likely to remain a very small minority of all women. Furthermore, it must be emphasized that a large number of self-employed women are only formally economically âindependentâ; in reality they can be lowly paid and easily expendable âoutâ or âhomeâ workers who provide subcontracting services for larger companies (Cragg and Dawson, 1981; Allen, 1983). Even so, there are a number of trends to suggest that women are more likely to start their own independent businesses now than in the past.
In this book we study the experiences of these women: the benefits they obtain and the difficulties they encounter. More particularly, we are interested in the extent to which women are able to overcome experiences of subordination through business proprietorship. On the basis of in-depth interviews with a number of women business owners, we investigate their motives and the consequent experiences of entrepreneurship. It seems reasonable to assume that although many women are similar t...