Part I
Disturbing Expectations
1 Troubling Bodies of Evidence
Gender, Detection, and the Problems of Self-Reinvention in Raymond Chandlerâs The Lady in the Lake and Tim OâBrienâs In the Lake of the Woods
Andrew M. Hakim
The pulpy, bloated body of a veteranâs missing wife rises from a lake, weeks after she disappeared. Or perhaps the body is that of a different woman altogether, who was murdered so the missing wife could escape into a new identity âŚ
In a fit of madness, a senator boils his wife alive, and then discards her body into a lake. Or she may have simply had a boating accident, or drowned, or slipped across the Canadian border to a new life âŚ
Ladies in lakes. Missing or unrecognizable bodies. Mistaken identities. These are the common themes permeating Raymond Chandlerâs The Lady in the Lake (1943) and Tim OâBrienâs In the Lake of the Woods (1994). In both texts, a female body represents a key piece of evidence necessary to the reestablishment of moral certainty and the restoration of order in an America seemingly adrift and lacking authority. Set against the backdrop of warâWorld War II in The Lady in the Lake and the still resonant echoes of Vietnam in In the Lake of the Woodsâboth novels draw on Arthurian legends of ladies in lakes as they float multiple and often conflicting solutions to their mysteries before readers. Yet despite the textsâ plot similarities and shared thematic concerns, critics have not remarked upon the ways OâBrienâs novel responds to and extends Chandlerâs exploration of gender, detection, and American myths of individualism and self-making nearly half a century later. Iâm interested here, then, not merely in the thematic currents of ladies in lakes that ripple outward from Chandler to OâBrien, but in particular the ways dubiously identified drowned corpses, like the one Marlowe finds in Chandlerâs novel, and women who have simply vanished, like Kathy Wade in OâBrienâs text, enact a paradoxical reading experience that dislocates and destabilizes readersâ expectations. Instead of offering answers, Chandler and OâBrien plunge readers into mysteries centered on female bodies that disturb the very tropes we have come to expect from detective fiction,1 and in so doing force us to reconsider how we read both texts and other people.
In this essay I examine the ways The Lady in the Lake and In the Lake of the Woods challenge a generic tradition where women become âreadableâ bodies, the reading of which often leads to overly simplistic solutions to textual mysteries and a return to national wholeness. Placing Chandlerâs and OâBrienâs novels in conversation illustrates that, in a nation where detectives can be murderers and successful politicians can be war criminals, finding and correctly identifying the bodies of ladies in lakes offers anything but the possibility of closure, moral certainty, and the restoration of order so often associated with detective fiction. In fact, the evidence in these texts appears to preclude it: the drowned woman in The Lady in the Lake is not who Marlowe thinks she is; the body of the missing senatorâs wife is never dredged up from the lakes of In the Lake of the Woods. In place of tidy resolutions, Chandlerâs and OâBrienâs novels bring to the surface an undercurrent of uncertainty that troubles our understanding of the ways detective fiction operates, and thereby raise questions about genre and form, gender and detection, and the tension between American ideals of freedom and independence and postwar U.S. national narratives of restored order, harmony, and unity. Considered in relationship to one another, The Lady in the Lake and In the Lake of the Woods present a complex investigation of both the genre and the nation that highlights a fundamental conflict between a cultural privileging of individualism and a country seeking order and unity in times of both war and peace.
Chandler and OâBrien emphasize this tension by introducing ladies in lakes into their detective fictions and drawing on the complicated, multifarious visions of gender and femininity presented in Arthurian legendsâtales that are themselves deeply concerned with the restoration of order in fifth and sixth century Britain. In the Arthurian tradition, the lady in the lake is a slippery, ambiguous figure who appears in multiple tales and personas. In fact, there seem to be several different ladies in lakes in the mythology. In some versions she is a positive character who presents King Arthur with his sword, Excalibur, or raises Sir Lancelot after the death of his father and cures him when he temporarily goes mad. In others, she is the enchantress who seduces Merlin and either encases him in a tree or seals him in a cave. Later poets such as Lord Tennyson and Edwin Arlington Robinson have further contributed to her complexity, Tennyson by casting her as an explicitly evil character, Robinson by depicting her as Merlinâs true love. Given these varied depictions, Arthurian scholar Sue Ellen Holbrook judges that in the lady in the lake, âTo be sure, we have a character who is not cut from whole cloth, and the seams are visible,â even if there is a âacceptable logicâ in her development from helpless damsel in distress to sorcererâs apprentice and finally to a powerful sorceress in her own right.2 Often considered of fairy origin, she is fey, elusive, and at times dangerous in a manner that anticipates the femme fatale of detective fiction.
The shifting, elusive and somewhat threatening nature of the Arthurian lady in the lake flows through both Chandlerâs and OâBrienâs novels, as their central female figures endeavor to negotiate a space within the dominant norms of twentieth-century American culture. Writing about Chandlerâs novel, Carl Malmgren notes that its very title âindicates the Arthurian origin of the story,â which will revolve around Philip Marloweâs quest to track down his clientâs missing wife, only to discover a stream of bodies and a perilous woman about whom everyone seems to have the wrong idea.3 Describing the novelâs âsignature motifâ as âthe woman who is at once there and not there,â Malmgren asserts that through her varied appearances in the novel, Muriel Chess comes to signify âthe woman as marker or vanishing trace.â4 Sliding between identities and manipulating and murdering both men and women for her own gain, she threatens the status quo of a 1940s U.S. already unsettled by World War II. Kathy Wade too might be described as a vanishing trace in OâBrienâs novel. In fact, even more so than Muriel Chess in The Lady in the Lake, she is at once there and not there, simply disappearing one day after she and her husband have retreated to a cabin in Minnesotaâs lake country following the scandalous revelations of John Wadeâs participation in war atrocities and his subsequent political defeat. As John Wade thinks at one point late in OâBrienâs novel, the only thing anyone can pin down in the text is that âKathy was gone, everything else was guesswork. Probably an accident. Or lost out there. Something simple. For sureâalmost for sure.â5 Kathy is gone, âfor sure.â But, as Wade then qualifies, any suppositionsâincluding the possibility that he murdered herâcan only ever be âalmost for sureâ in this narrative. In fact, the other charactersâ inability to dredge Kathy Wadeâs corpse from the lakes of In the Lake of the Woods highlights and accentuates fears of a post-Vietnam, late twentieth century epistemological breakdown on national, local, and individual levels.
OâBrien underscores this lack of certainty and potential for epistemological breakdown through his formal organization of the novel. Where Chandlerâs text is structured as a series of episodes wherein information accretes until Marlowe arrives at the answers at the center of the mysteryâconvoluted and unsettling as these answers might beâIn the Lake of the Woods is composed of a sequence of three different chapter types: narratives of John and Kathy Wadeâs life together; lists of real and imagined âevidenceâ from interviews, war tribunals, historical texts, and other sources; and âhypothesisâ chapters wherein the narrator attempts to reconstruct what really happened to Kathy. The hypothesis chapters in particular are crucial to OâBrienâs narrative, as they highlight everyoneâsâthe charactersâ, narratorâs, and even readersââendeavors to dredge up not only some sort of answer, some form of truth, but also Kathy herself, the woman. This is, as OâBrienâs narrator tells us, our âhuman desire for certainty,â which detective fiction caters to (266). âWhy do we care about Lizzie Borden, or Judge Crater, or Lee Harvey Oswald, or the Little Big Horn?â OâBrienâs narrator asks late in the novel, before answering, âMystery! Because of all that cannot be knownâ (266). Without certainty, there is only âeternal doubt, which both frustrates and fascinates. Itâs a standoff. The human desire for certainty collides with our love of enigmaâ (266). What OâBrien points to here is the central desire in reading detective fiction: namely, to be tantalized, caught in the pleasurable space between âour love of enigmaâ and âthe human desire for certainty.â It is a desire to be teased with answers to the unknown, to be deceived into believing we can solve what might be unsolvable, know what is unknowable, even though we realize this is impossible.
But still, we want to know.
Tzvetan Todorov has famously written that mystery storiesâwhich he terms âwhodunitsââare dualistic at their core, that they contain ânot one but two stories: the story of the crime and the story of the investigation.â6 Drawing on the Russian Formalistsâ distinction between fabula (story) and syuzhet (plot), Todorov further characterizes the distinction between these two-stories-in-one by labeling the story of the crime âwhat really happenedâ and the story of the investigation âhow the reader (or the narrator) has come to know about it.â7 Yet Todorovâs divisions, while useful, arenât always adequate because not all detective fictions are simple (or even complex) âwhodunitsâ where readers eventually learn âwhat really happened.â A more useful way of thinking about detective fiction might be found in one of In the Lake of the Woodsâ early âevidenceâ chapters, where OâBrien cites Robert Parrishâs The Magicianâs Handbook: âIn every trick there are two carefully thought out linesâthe way it looks and the way it isâ (97). Here, OâBrienâs novel presents us with âevidenceâ describing how a âtrickâ works, and in so doing links detection to stage magic and points out the connection between performance and deception in the creation of a detective novel, the way such texts mislead readers by offering an illusion (âthe way it looksâ) in place of the way something actually âis.â From very early on, then, OâBrien confronts us with the fact that we are, on a basic level, being tricked. Yet it is a pleasurable deception to experience. Given our âhuman desire for certainty,â we might say that, as readers, we not only want to be deceived on some level, but also need to be. Despite our âlove of enigma,â we want to believe in the âtrickâ provided by closure at the end of so many detective fictions, where moral certainty and order are restored following the successful solving of a crime. But, as both OâBrien and Chandler demonstrate, this readerly desire to solve a mystery is in the end just the result of a trick, an attempt to hide the way something is behind the way it looks. Instead of catering to such desires, these writers plunge readers into mysteries where âwhat really happenedâ is not something readers will come to know easily, if at all. By rigorously investigating the differences between the way something looksâwhat we believe happened in a crime storyâand the way it really isâthe larger social, cultural, and political undercurrents at workâChandler and OâBrien break down the conventions of detective fiction and demonstrate that, as OâBrienâs nameless narrator tells us, âAmong the missing, as among the dead, there is only the flux of possibilityâ (23). And the possibilities raised by the missing and the dead in The Lady in the Lake and In the...