Intimate Relationships:
College Students from Divorced and Intact Families
Lisa Gabardi
Lee A. RosƩn
SUMMARY. The study examined differences between college students from divorced and intact families on several measures of intimate relationships. Analyses indicated that students from divorced families had more sexual partners and desired more sexual involvement when going steady than students from intact families. Regression analyses indicated that, for students from both divorced and intact families, parental marital conflict was a significant predictor of total number of sexual partners and negative attitudes toward marriage. In addition, parentsā marital status was a significant predictor of sexual involvement while going steady and a significant predictor of self perceptions of sociability and morality. For students from divorced families, conflict after the divorce was a significant predictor of sexual involvement while going steady and negative attitudes toward marriage. Number of years since the divorce occurred was also a significant predictor of sexual involvement desired after several dates, relationship beliefs, and attitudes toward marriage for students from divorced families. Implications of these results are discussed in terms of college studentsā development of intimate relationships.
Investigators have recently begun to study the effects of parental divorce on adult āchildrenā of divorce. Although research has indicated that age and developmental stage are critical factors affecting young childrenās response to divorce (Hetherington, 1981; Krudek, 1981; Wallerstein & Kelly, 1980) few investigations have focused on the impact of parental divorce on measures relevant to the developmental stage of adult children. Many researchers have continued to focus on measures of adjustment used in studies with younger children-psychological adjustment, academic success, sexrole development, self-concept, family relations, and loss (Farber, Primav-era, & Felner, 1983; Fine, Moreland, & Schwebel, 1983; Grossman, Shea, & Adams, 1980; Kulka, Weingarten, 1979). The effects parental divorce may have on young adult issues such as dating, sexuality, ability to be intimate, and beliefs about relationships and marriage have not been adequately examined (Booth, Brinkerhoff, & White, 1984; Hepworth, Ryder, & Dreyer, 1984; Hillard, 1984; Kalter, Riember, Buckman, & Woo Chen, 1985; Kelly, 1981). Some researchers have suggested that young adults from divorced families differ from those of intact families in their beliefs and behaviors involving intimate relationships (Cooney, Smyer, Hagestad, Klock, 1986; Parish, 1981; Vess, Schwebel, & Moreland, 1983). We conducted this study to expand our understanding of how intimacy development is impacted by parental divorce.
METHOD
Subjects
Subjects were 300 college students enrolled in introductory psychology courses at Colorado State University. To decrease the demographic variance of the subject pool, only students who were between 18 and 25 years of age, single, heterosexual, had parents that were still married or had been divorced only once, and had not been sexually abused were included in the study.1 Information on the demographic characteristics of the subject pool is presented in Table 1.
Procedure
Students were pre-screened to meet the demographic criteria for this study using the demographic data sheet. Subjects from divorced and intact families were randomly selected from the pre-screening information. Subjects were then asked to complete a series of paper and pencil questionnaires regarding demographic information, dating status, sexual behaviors, relationship beliefs, intimacy, attitudes toward marriage, and self-esteem. Surveys were group administered and all subjects were informed that the survey information was completely confidential. Questionnaires in the survey packets were randomly ordered and identified by subject number to maintain anonymity.
Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of the Subject Pool
| Characteristic | N | Percent(%) |
| Gender | | |
| Female | 193 | 64.3 |
| Male | 107 | 35.7 |
| Race/Ethnieity | | |
| Asian American | 22 | 3.7 |
| Black | 12 | 4.0 |
| Caucasian | 255 | 85.0 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5.3 |
| Native American | 4 | 1.3 |
| Other (Unspecified) | 2 | 0.7 |
| Religion | | |
| Catholic | 97 | 32.3 |
| Christian | 76 | 25.3 |
| Jewish | 12 | 4.0 |
| Protestant | 57 | 19.0 |
| Agnostic | 23 | 7.7 |
| Other (Unspecified) | 31 | 11.6 |
| Class Standing | | |
| Freshman | 171 | 57.0 |
| Sophomore | 44 | 14.7 |
| Junior | 56 | 18.7 |
| Senior | 28 | 9.3 |
| Other | 1 | 0.3 |
| Parental Marital Status | | |
| Married | 185 | 61.7 |
| Divorced | 115 | 38.3 |
Measures
Demographic data sheet. Subjects completed a series of questions regarding age, gender, marital status, religion, racial/ethnic background, class, grade point average and academic major, and family information such as parental education. Subjects were also asked several questions regarding their biological parentsā marital history.
Parental conflict scale. Subjects were asked to rate the level of conflict between their parents on a Likert scale from 1 to 7 (1 = no conflict, 7 = extremely high conflict). If studentsā parents were divorced, students were also asked to rate the conflict between their parents for the year prior to the divorce and for the year following the divorce on a similar Likert scale. While this scale is based upon studentsā recollections of their parentsā relationships, we felt it was important to assess how students perceived their parentsā relationship when they were growing up. Some researchers suggest that studentsā perceptions of their parentsā relationship are more pertinent to their adjustment than their parentsā actual level of conflict (Greenberg & Nay, 1982).
Sexual Behavior Measures
Sexuality inventory. Subjects were asked questions regarding their dating status, frequency of their current and past sexual behavior, and sexual orientation. S...