1 Introduction
Delphia, the title character of The Prophetess (1622) by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger,1 prophesies that Diocles will become the new emperor when he has slain a certain âmighty Boarâ (1.2.35). Hoping to ascend to the throne as he has been promised, Diocles spends much of his time hunting and killing âhideous and fierceâ boars (1.2.38), though in vain. Finally he comes face to face with Aper, a regicide, a âtoo much honourd villainâ (1.1.15), and a man who is the true mighty boar:
| DIOCLES | âŚsince my future fate depends upon thee, |
| Thus, to fulfill great Delphiaâs Prophecie, |
| Aper (thou fatal Boar) receive the honour |
| To fall by Diocles hand. Shine clear, my Stars, |
| That usherâd me to taste this common air, |
| In my entrance to the world, and give applause |
| To this great work. |
| Musick. |
| Delphia | Strike Musick from the Spheres. |
| .............................................. |
| Diocles | Ha? In the Air? |
| All | Miraculous. |
| Maximinian | This shews the gods approve The Person, and the Act. |
(2.3.43â52)
Senators and guards in the scene, as if on the cue of the music from the air, all hail Diocles as the new king and dress him with âImperial Robesâ (2.3.63). A blank song, a song for which no words are provided in a dramatic text, is heard at the investiture. Maximinian continues to marvel at the heavenly endorsement signified through the song: âStill the gods / Expresse that they are pleasâd with this electionâ (2.3.66â7). Shortly after the prophetessâs art has âhonoured [Diocles] with various Musicks, and sweet sounding airsâ (3.1.169), she arranges a she-devil to appear to the accompaniment of music at the demand of a foolish offi cer, Geta:
| Geta | I would have a handsom, pleasant and a fine she-devil, |
| To entertain the Ladies that come to me; |
| A travellâd devil too, that speaks the tongues, |
| And a neat carving devil. |
| Musick. |
| Enter a She-devil. |
| Delphia | Be not fearful. |
| Geta | A prettie brown devil ifaith; may I not kiss her? |
| Delphia | Yes, and embrace her too; she is your servant. Fear not; her lips are cool enough. |
(3.2.105â11)
Delphia calls herself âthe Mistris of my Artâ (2.1.81) and has âthe Musick of the Spheres attendingâ on her (2.1.72). Throughout the play, she has the power to invoke preternatural music for scenes of either divine or diabolical revelation, just as the above two quotations have shown. The âMusick from the Spheresâ that Delphia causes to sound after Dioclesâs valiant killing of Aper is perceived to be âin the air.â To say that certain music is âin the airâ often indicates that the music is coming from the sky. All witnesses of this musical episode find the sonic experience amazing, with Maximinian exclaiming that the music âshews the gods approve / the Person, and the Act.â Under this sign of celestial approval, Delphia in effect becomes a representative of heavenly power. What the prophetess does can be interpreted as anointing Diocles as the new king with her supernatural music. The attribute of divinity in music is established at an early stage in the play and is reinforced by Maximinianâs continual awe. In the second incident, the music accompanying the entrance of a she-devil conjured by the prophetess for the foolish Geta embodies another kind of supernatural power associated with music. The demonic figure responds to Delphiaâs musical summoning and materializes in front of Geta. Delphiaâs music is compatible with both the divine and the diabolic; both heaven and hell are subject to and within the reach of the power of the prophetessâs music.
The above example illustrates two of the most common and contrastive associations of music in the general perception during the English Renaissance, namely, heavenly order and demonic disorder. Such dichotomy finds extensive application in recent studies of theatrical function and significance of music in early modern English plays. However, while ideological dualities identified in music in traditional Renaissance thinking may seem unequivocal, various musical representations of characters and situations in early modern drama can prove otherwise. This book, building upon the conventional construction of binarism, offers an alternative model of hybridity which explores how playwrights at the time both created their musical characters and scenarios according to the received cultural use and perception of music, and experimented with the multivalent meanings and significance embodied in theatrical music. Music and Gender looks at how male and female characters participate and interact in musical activities both inside and outside the contemporary societal decorum. Their behaviors vary in degrees of conformity and subversion. The present discussion, with a focus on non-Shakespearean drama, examines musical characters and episodes from a large number of early modern plays, many of which have not received critical consideration. It will broaden our understanding of theatrical representation of music, or musical dramaturgy, as well as complicating the discussion of musical portrayal and construction of gender in English Renaissance drama.
The negotiation between the sublime and the corrupt in music has always been an important topic in social and philosophical perception of the art since classical times. In The Republic, Plato draws a distinction between musical modes. Dorian and Phrygian modes are suitable for âmen of a warlike dispositionâ and can âmost fittingly imitate the voice and accents of a brave man in time of war,â whereas the Ionian and Lydian modes are appropriate for luxury, laziness, and parties.2 He believes that oneâs disposition depends on the kind of music one listens to:
So if you give music the chance to play upon your soul, and pour into the funnel of your ears the sweet, soft, lamenting modesâŚif you spend your whole life humming them, bewitched by song, then the first effect on a nature with any spirit in it is to soften it, like heating iron, making it malleable instead of brittle and unworkable. But if you press on regardless, and are seduced by it, the next stage is melting and turning to liquidâthe complete dissolution of the spirit. It cuts the sinews out of your soul, and turns it into a âfeeble warrior.ââŚPeople like this become hot-tempered and quick to anger, irritable instead of spirited.3
Depending on the modes of music a man chooses to engage himself in, music can either strengthen masculinity or dissolve a manâs prowess and determination. Fondness for soft music is unacceptable for men of military valor. Lodowick Lloyd writes that âMars claymed Musicke in the fielde,⌠Venus occupieth Musicke in chambers. That kind of gentle and soft Musick, the Egyptians forbade the youth to be taught therin, least from men, they would become againe women.â4 In The Maidâs Tragedy (ca.1610)5 by Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher, when military leader Melantius is invited to join in a masque and âtread a souldiers measure,â he excuses himself and calls courtly dances âsoft and silken warresâ (1.1.40, 41). He would rather âdaunce with armesâ to music that is âshrill and all confusâd / That stirs [his] bloodâ (1.1.42â3). Another Fletcherian military man, Captain Pontius in Valentinian (ca.1614)6 proclaims boldly that his songs
Goe not toâth Lute, or Violl, but toâth Trumpet,
My tune kept on a Target, and my subject
The well struck wounds of men, not love, or women.
(3.2.10â12)
His music, with a strong militaristic quality, is differentiated from the more amorous and feminine music elsewhere in this tragedy, such as the music of seduction employed in 2.5. Similarly, Benedick in Shakespeareâs Much Ado About Nothing (1598)7 ridicules the newly love-smitten Claudio because âthere was no music with him but the drum and the fife, and now had he rather hear the tabor and the pipeâ (2.3.13â15).
Aristotle speaks of the benefits of enjoying music in moderation in The Politics. Music to Aristotle is one of the four âcustomary branches of education.â8 His endorsement of the importance of musical education is alluded to in Richard Mulcasterâs Positions:
Some men thinke it to be too too sweete, and that it may be either quite forborne, or not so much followed. For mine owne parte I dare not dispraise it, which hath so great defendours, and deserveth so well, and I must needs allow it, which place it among those, that I do esteeme the cheife principles, for training up of youth, not of mine owne head alone, but by the advise of all antiquitie, all learned philosophie, all skilfull training, which make Musick still one of the principles,⌠to bring youth first up in.9
Boethius in the 6th century also thinks that music has direct effect and affect upon the internal harmony of the listeners: âmusic is related not only to speculation but to morality as well. Nothing is more characteristic of human nature than to be soothed by sweet modes and disturbed by their opposites.â10 Nonetheless the said actions of music are also dependent on the listenerâs disposition: âA lascivious mind takes pleasure in the more lascivious modes⌠Contrariwise, a sterner mind either finds joy in the more stirring modes and is braced by them.â11 The Roman philosopher agrees with Plato and recommends the study of music that is âchaste, simple, and masculine, not effeminate, savage, and inconsistent.â12 Saint Isidore of Seville, some 100 years later, gives music a well-rounded praise in Etymologiarum. Goodness is attached to music in an unconditional manner, and is prevalent in all aspects of the universe:
Thus without music no discipline can be perfect, for there is nothing without it. The very universe, it is said, is held together by a certain harmony of sounds, and the heavens themselves are made to revolve by the modulation of harmony.13
This notion is taken up in the Renaissance by Gioseffo Zarlino, who affirms that âthere is no good thing that does not have a musical dispositionâ in Institutioni harmoniche.14 This Renaissance music theorist is convinced that music âleads man back to the contemplation of celestial things and has such power that it perfects everything it is joined to.â15 The canon of English Renaissance drama houses many eulogies for the practice of music. An expansive one can be found in Samuel Rowleyâs When You See Me, You Know Me (ca.1604).16 Doctor Tye, the music instructor of the young prince, describes music to be âfit for Kings, / And not for those knowes not the chimes of stringsâ (G4r). He calls music âheavenly, for in Heaven is Musickeâ (G4r). In his ornate speech about the virtuous appeal of music (G4râv), he states that through musical training, monarchs acquire much more than simply musical techniques, including a discerning eye on issues of patronage, power, and display of wealth. The hierarchical heavenly imagery and the Orphic effect therein are allusions to conventional ideas of order and harmony.
Boethiusâs idea that the same piece of music can result in different effects in different listeners finds echo in Thomas Wrightâs The Passions of the Minde. Wright takes a less defined stance than many others of his time. He writes about different interactive perceptions of any musical episode:
divers consorts stirre up in the heart, divers sorts of joyes, and divers sorts of sadnesse or paine: the which as men are affected, may be diversely applyed: Let a good and a godly man heare musicke, and he will lift up his heart to heaven: let a bad man heare the same, and hee will convert it to lust.⌠True it is, that one kinde of musicke may be more apt to one passion then another.17
He is aware of the two distinct types of reactions music can arouse in a hearerâs soul, the sublimating and the corrupting, depending on the individual mindset of the perceiver. Mulcaster also declares that âMans faulte makes the thing seeme filthie.â18 He moralizes that if we behave ourselves and think honest thoughts, âMusick will not harme theeâ and âit wel serve thee to good purpose.â19 Similar reasoning is found in The Praise of Music, which asserts that it is not at all the fault of music if one is found to be moved to effeminate or wanton thoughts by music, because music âit selfe is good: but [the fault is] in the corrupt nature, and evil disposition of light persons, which of themselves are prone to wantonness.â20 Some of Wrightâs contemporaries, however, are not as impartial. Music to them is either good or bad; there is no intermediary stance. ...