Introduction to Chapter 1
The Helgi Poems
Helgakviða Hundingsbana I and II; Helgakviða Hjörvarðssonar
(Poem about Helgi Slayer of Hundingr I and II; Poem about Helgi Son of Hjörvarðr)
Critical History
The heroic poems of the Poetic Edda begin not with Sigurðr, Brynhildr, and GuðrĂșn but rather with a far more obscure pair of heroes, both named Helgi. The first Helgi poem (HHI) does make him a son of Sigmundr and thus a half-brother of Sinfjötli and Sigurðr (sts. 6â8), but that is probably an attempt to bring this originally separate heroic cycle into the family of the Völsungs.1 Helgi Hundingsbani and his men are otherwise called Ylfings (sts. 34, 49; HHII sts. 4, 8, 47), a tribe found in Sweden, and his world is thus separate from the continental setting of the Völsung poems.2 The heroic legends of Helgi Hundingsbani and his predecessor, Helgi Hjörvarðsson, will serve as a prologue to the more unified and more internationally known legends to follow in the Codex Regius.
Like Sigurðr, both Helgis take up with valkyries with tragic consequences. The first Helgi is born, dressed in chain-mail from day one; the norns visit and predict his fate. He kills King Hundingr and then after some splendid battle poetry defeats four of Hundingrâs sons. The valkyrie SigrĂșn descends from the sky to Helgi (in HHII she says she loved him before she had seen him), but he will have to defeat her suitor. After a flyting between opposing champions, Helgi does so, and SigrĂșn says he will enjoy her as well as lands and victory; HHI ends here.3 HHII adds that they marry, but that Helgi had killed her father and one of her brothers. Years later her surviving brother Dagr kills Helgi with a spear lent him by Ăðinn. SigrĂșn curses Dagr and then makes a bed beside Helgi in his burial mound, but he returns to Valhöll.
Helgakviða Hjörvarðssonar is placed in the manuscript between HHI and HHII. After some initial difficulties, Hjörvarðr takes the beautiful Sigrlinn as his bride. She gives birth to a son. One day the son is sitting on a barrow and the valkyrie SvĂĄva goes by, names him Helgi, and shows him where to find a fine sword. He uses it to kill Sigrlinnâs former suitor, accompanied by his fatherâs right-hand man, Atli. He and Helgi engage in a flyting with the giantess HrĂmgerðr until the day dawns and she turns into stone. Later Helgiâs brother Heðinn makes a drunken vow that he will marry SvĂĄva. Helgi is mortally wounded in battle, asks SvĂĄva to marry Heðinn, but she declines. A line at the end of the poem says that Helgi and SvĂĄva are reborn; HHII specifies that they are reborn as Helgi Hundingsbani and SigrĂșn.
Scholarship on the Helgi poems from 1955 to 1984 is listed and discussed in Harris (1985). Encyclopedia articles on the poems are found in Strayer and in Pulsiano. The German-language Kommentar (von See 1997 â) devotes its entire fourth volume to the Helgi poems, with discussions of textual transmission, history of criticism, and line by line annotations. Joseph Harris (1983) describes, with fine attention to manuscript detail, the way HHII condenses and supplements HHI. Theodore Andersson gives a welcome study of HHj, calling it âthe most neglected of all Eddic poemsâ (54). He provides a full summary and then relates the poemâs motifs to those of Old Norse fornaldarsögur, especially those dealing with the Hrafnistumenn. The first half of the poem, dealing with Helgiâs father Hjörvarðr, draws on bridal-quest motifs known from German-derived material like Ăiðreks saga, such as may also have influenced âsecondary Eddic laysâ (69) like AtlamĂĄl and Sigurðarkviða in skamma. John Stanley Martin shows how both Helgis, despite the fact that their name means âconsecrated one,â are not âsacral kings,â semi-divine beings whose âpowers sustain the fecundity of the natural environment.â Rather they are valued for their wisdom, munificence, and prowess as warriors. Carolyne Larrington discusses the Helgi poems in light of sibling relations, contrasting the early careers of Helgi Hundingsbani and his half-brother Sinfjötli and noting Helgiâs death at the hands of his brother-in-law Dagr, which enrages Helgiâs wife and Dagrâs sister SigrĂșn. Helgiâs mother Borghildr values her brother over her stepson Sinfjötli, poisoning him for killing her brother. Regarding Helgi Hjörvarðsson, Larrington discusses his brother Heðinnâs rivalry for the valkyrie bride SvĂĄva. In the chapter that follows, David Clark examines the Helgi poems in the light of âhomosocial desireââof male bonding and competition among themselves and over heterosexual partners. Some aspects of the poem that previous commentators have found âbizarre and unnecessaryâ make more sense when viewed âin terms of its gender dynamic.â
âPaul Acker
Notes
Works Cited
Andersson, Theodore M. ââHelgakviða Hjörvarðssonarâ and European Bridal-Narrative.â JEGP 84 (1985): 51â75.
Harris, Joseph. âEddic Poetry.â Old Norse-Icelandic Literature: A Critical Guide. Ed. Carol J. Clover and John Lindow. Islandica 45. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 68â156.
ââ. âEddic Poetry as Oral Poetry: The Evidence of Parallel Passages in the Helgi Poems for Questions of Composition and Performance.â Edda: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Robert J. Glendinning and Haraldur Bessason. Winnipeg: U of Manitoba P, 1983. 210â242.
Larrington, Carolyne. âSibling Drama: Laterality in the Heroic Poems of the Edda.â Myths, Legends, and Heroes: Essays on Old Norse and Old English Literature. Ed. Daniel Anlezark. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2011. 169â187.
Martin, John Stanley. âSome Thoughts on Kingship in the Helgi Poems.â Poetry in the Scandinavian Middle Ages. Ed. Teresa PĂĄroli. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sullâalto medioevo, 1990. 369â382.
Pulsiano, Phillip, et al., eds. Medieval Scandinavia: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland, 1993.
Strayer, Joseph R., ed. Dictionary of the Middle Ages. New York: Scribner, 1982â1989.
von See, Klaus, et al., eds. Kommentar zu den Liedern der Edda. Heidelberg: Winter, 1997â.
1
Heroic Homosociality and Homophobia in the Helgi Poems1
David Clark
This chapter evaluates the usefulness of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwickâs concept of âhomosocial desireâ in understanding the construction of heroism in the Helgi poems of the Poetic Edda. Sedgwick inaugurates the use of this concept in pursuit of her hypothesis of âthe potential unbrokenness of a continuum between homosocial and homosexualâ (1985, 1). However, she observes that homosocial desire is often normalized by homophobic discourseâhomosexuality is explicitly abjected or refused in order to validate homosocial bonds. Therefore, Sedgwickâs concept is potentially helpful in illuminating the dynamic at work in three poems that seem to replicate this dynamic: Helgakviða Hundingsbana in fyrri (The First Lay of Helgi Hundingsbani), Helgakviða Hjörvarðssonar (The Second Lay of Helgi Hjörvarðsson), and Helgakviða Hundingsbana önnor (The Second Lay of Helgi Hundingsbani). These poems center on heroic adventure and martial exploits, where homo-social intimacy between warriors is predicated on the exclusion of same-sex eroticism seen most clearly in the exchange of sexual insults, or nĂð. Nevertheless, although Sedgwick has influenced work on premodern sexuality by several medieval and early modern scholars, her approach has not been accepted uncritically, and indeed it needs some modification in order to avoid anachronism in its application to medieval texts.
Drawing on research on cognate material by Preben Meulengracht SĂžrensen and my own work, this chapter begins to develop a critical approach to heroic homosociality that allows the texts to speak on their own terms and to interrogate modern categories and taxonomies of sexuality. In particular, it replaces Sedgwickâs emphasis (via Girard) on the triangulation of desire through a woman with a more nuanced approach to the erotics of interpersonal relations. Finally, the chapter demonstrates that the âincoherentâ plot of Helgakviða Hjörvarðssonar makes more sense if we unpack the complexities of the poemâs construction of Helgiâs relations with friend, brother, and lover.2
Sedgwick and Homosocial Desire
The heroism in the Helgi poems is readily apparent. It may be less obvious, however, why the essay title employs and opposes the terms âhomosocialityâ and âhomophobiaâ. In doing so, it explicitly draws on the work of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, one of the founders (along with Judith Butler and others) of the branch of gender/sexuality studies known as Queer Theory. Sedgwick inaugurates the use of the phrase âhomosocial desireâ at the start of her influential book Between Men: English Literature and Male Homo-social Desire. The term âhomosocialâ had already become a standard term in sociological studies, and, in a discussion of Sedgwickâs work, Stephen Jaeger describes the term with approval as one that:
sets sexuality to one side, eliminates its automatic inclusion, while holding it in readiness. The discourse of male-male love displays on its surface sexuality vanquished and banished. Sexual desire and sexual intercourse can infiltrate it secretly, but they do not govern it from their position of hiding. (15)
However, Sedgwick in fact employs the term in a collocation of her own coinage: âhomosocial desire.â This, as she remarks, appears to be something of an oxymoronââhomosocialâ is a neologism formed by analogy with âhomosexual,â from which it is thus intended to be distinguished and is usually applied to so-called âmale bondingâ activities, which are frequently, in many Western societies, characterized by homophobia. Therefore, Sedgwick remarks:
To draw the âhomosocialâ back into the orbit of âdesire, of the potentially erotic ⊠is to hypothesize the potential unbrokenness of a continuum between homosocial and homosexualâa continuum whose visibility, for men, in our society, is radically disrupted. (1985, 1â2)
In our society, she explains, where there is a site of homosocial desire that society sanctions, one often finds that this desire is normalized via homophobic discourseâhomosexuality is explicitly abjected.3 Often cited in this context is the locker-room where manly men often make homophobic jokes to demonstrate that their physical and emotional intimacy with other men does not make them âgay.â4 Sedgwick clarifies that she does not want to suggest a âgeneticâ hypothesisâto claim that homosexual desire lies at the root of all forms of interaction between men. Instead, ...