Chapter 1
Young women âon the marginsâ
Representation, research and politics
Julie McLeod and Andrea C. Allard
Â
Young women living on the educational, economic and spatial fringes occupy highly ambiguous positions in todayâs social fabric. These include young women who may have left school early, or have troubled histories with schooling, or are alienated from educational and other social institutions, often without paid work and often living in difficult material and emotional circumstances. They are known and yet not known. They are known, for instance, as difficult and also as being in difficulty; as dangerous and also as being in danger; of being exposed to risk and of putting themselves at risk; and as subject to state surveillance but also treated with indifference and lack of respect. Yet what do we really know about how they negotiate the challenges of their everyday lives? How do these young women get by and what strategies and resources can and do they mobilize? How do schools and other social agencies hinder or harm them and how might they better support them? And how are their lives and experiences regarded and represented â in the media, in schools, in policy interventions, in public imagination, and by themselves?
This volume addresses the educational, social, work and biographical experiences of young women who are routinely constructed as âat riskâ, and explores the social and cultural representations that govern our understandings of them. Recent feminist scholarship on girlhood argues for the emergence of a ânew girl orderâ and changes in femininity in a post-feminist and post-modern era (Aapola et al. 2004; Driscoll 2002; Harris 2004). Sociological theories of late modernity speak in the language of transformation and de-traditionalization â of gender, of identity, of social relations (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 1995; Giddens 1992; cf Adkins 2002). It is far from clear, however, whether these various arguments apply to young women living and learning on the margins. Do these young women epitomise a new or old girl order? How do changed social and cultural circumstances affect the gendered experiences of marginalization?
While the impact of feminism inside and outside of schools has brought real gains for many women and girls, the extent and form of such changes has been somewhat uneven and class differentiated. Focussing on overall gains and changes or on a new girl order can obscure both the experiences of those for whom success in conventional terms remains elusive and the heterogenous and complex material and cultural spaces girls inhabit. The discourse of ânew timesâ can also overshadow proper consideration of whether or how patterns of differentiation and inequalities, as well as deep-seated cultural meanings and images, can persist or echo across time, place and different political and social contexts. This is not to suggest that such meanings and inequalities remain unchanged, nor to imply that they take the same form in twenty-first century Canada or Australia as they did in mid-twentieth-century Europe. Rather, it is to question notions of new times, or of new girl orders, which infer a simple view of historical processes â as if social change is abrupt and radically discontinuous with the past â and neglect to see the ways in which elements of change and continuity are part of the present.
The current strong policy and public attention to the educational experiences and outcomes of boys similarly works to overstate the extent of the transformation of gender/femininity by constructing a simultaneously normative and demonized vision of high-achieving girls whose success is at the expense of that of the boys. In this climate, gender equity initiatives are directed to redressing disadvantages experienced by boys and men (Connell 2005). From popular culture to educational policies, we more commonly hear stories about girls and achievement than we hear about the difficulties many girls continue to face. Girls are regarded as the new emblem of educational success, the ideal subjects of modernity, the group for whom schooling works. The so-called feminization of curriculum and assessment, the predominance of female teachers, and the effects of feminism in making girls more ambitious all combine apparently to ensure smooth pathways to success for girls. Yet, as numerous scholars and many practitioners have observed, the situation for many girls is neither so clear-cut nor so rosy. Questions about âwhich girls (and which boys)â are advantaged and disadvantaged, valued or de-valued, stigmatized or valorized, must continue to be posed, but they also require answers that shed light on how these social and cultural processes of differentiation happen â at the micro-level of day-to-day practice, not only at the macro-structural level â and how they are experienced.
There is, then, a raft of discourses variously telling us that times are new, that what counts as gender-based injustice has altered, that women and girls are doing all right, and that girlhood and femininities are transforming. There remain, however, groups of young women who continue to experience significant difficulties in and out of school. Social and educational marginalization encompasses a range of experiences that extend beyond the issue of alienation from schooling. Nevertheless, how young people encounter school cultures and systems is interwoven with their negotiation of social and work cultures and the making of their day-to-day and future lives. From a policy and database perspective, young women who leave school early or who are alienated from school and other social institutions are among the most economically disadvantaged young people today (Collins et al. 2000; Dusseldorp Skills Forum 2004). While such findings offer compelling evidence of inequality, they provide limited insight into the lived experiences of such women. The classification of these young women as âat riskâ has multiple discursive dangers, rendering social vulnerability as personal failing, and making risk seem to be an acquired attribute of subjectivity, disconnected from the social, economic and cultural processes that produce risk. The category âdisadvantaged young womenâ is itself heterogenous, and crude statistical and policy-driven categories of disadvantage can mask diverse experiences and strategies. Robust understandings of contemporary gender and social disadvantage require empirically and theoretically engaged studies that recognize diversity within inequality and examine the subtle and not so subtle ways in which processes of change and inequality interact and are influenced by both local and global factors.
The chapters in this volume contribute important new perspectives to these matters, drawing out different dimensions to the experiences and representations of young women and social and educational marginalization in particular national settings â Australia, Canada, Malaysia and the UK. As such, the book allows for comparative insights that take account of local specificities in light of discussions about gender, justice, identity, inequality and social change, and their intersection, that have significance beyond national borders. Taken together, the chapters promote critical dialogue with policies and programmes that are intended to address (or paradoxically are oblivious to) diverse forms of gender-based inequality. Marginalization and injustice are processes that are not solely reducible to a single identity or social category â be that class, gender, ethnicity, race, location, sexuality, disability. The term âgender-based injusticeâ is perhaps usefully understood as an assertion under erasure, and as an over-determined phenomenon, âfundamentally constituted ... by a complex set of political, cultural and economic processesâ (Swanson 2005: 88). Even so, working the tension between recognizing the effects and forms of gender-based injustice and marginalization, and destabilizing gender as the only type of social and identity differentiation, is one of the challenges facing contemporary feminism in education, and in other fields of social practice. The research projects discussed in this volume show some of the ways in which gender intersects with other social and identity factors, and the effects of this, particularly for young women living in poverty and difficult emotional and economic circumstances.
This book developed from a conference (held at Deakin University, Australia) on young women and social and educational marginalization that brought together scholars from Australia, the UK and Canada, along with policy makers, teachers and social and youth advocates, and representatives from youth and community agencies. The aim of the conference was to promote dialogue among these different groups of professionals and academics, and to address, from different perspectives, urgent concerns about the educational, social and work experiences of marginalized and stigmatized young women today.
The volume combines chapters that focus on young womenâs perspectives and their experiences with chapters that more directly address methodological and theoretical questions about how to research and analyse current forms, representations and consequences of social and gender-based inequality. It offers other researchers as well as practitioners insights into the challenge of how to research social marginalization, and reflections on projects and programmes that have attempted to do so. The role and positioning of the researcher, the repositioning of participants as subjects in and not objects of research, and issues of power, trust and reciprocity are all widely discussed in the field of qualitative methodology. But these issues are especially urgent when research is with vulnerable groups, and with young women whose lives may already have been scrutinized by any number of professionals attempting (ostensibly) to help or understand them. The chapters provide many practical and concrete examples of conducting research creatively and sensitively and these are interwoven with clear and concise explanations of relevant ethical and methodological issues alongside findings and insights.
Research approaches include cross-generational and longitudinal studies, and life history approaches that take biographical perspectives as their point of departure to develop: a longitudinal case study of a young British (Northern Ireland) working-class womanâs journey through the end of compulsory education, showing how she develops a sense of personal competence over time (Thomson); life history narratives of an Australian Aboriginal mother and grandmother, their memories of their schooling and how these experiences influenced the ways in which they now intervene in and influence the educational experiences of their own children (Sanderson); a longitudinal study of a teenage mother, that began when the young woman was a pregnant school student, and examines dilemmas associated with her construction (by others, by herself) as âsame-yet-differentâ from her peers (Harrison and Shacklock); a cross-generational study of young women on the margins of education and work and the strategies of hope and longing that they and their mothers draw upon in constructing the possibility of a different kind of life (McLeod).
Several of the chapters address policy gaps, silences and disjunctions between rhetoric and embodied encounters and the lived effects of policy imperatives: a case study of the struggle to establish a school-based child-care centre is analysed in light of the current climate of educational âpolicy hysteriaâ in contrast to the policy silence on the educational and social needs of pregnant and parenting students (Angwin and Kamp); the impact of new welfare reforms (Mutual Obligations Policies in Australia) on young women is analysed in terms of the subject positions these policies make available and how young women negotiate them (Edwards). The opening two chapters take questions about representation and image as a primary focus to examine: the ways in which stigma is attached to poor neighbourhoods and to the people who inhabit them, as well as the widening social-spatial polarization between the poor and not-poor and the particular consequences this has for women living in stigmatized communities (Warr); new approaches for analysing the cultural, spatial and political effects of contemporary representations of urban female youth, and the connections of these representations to historical images of women (Dillabough and van der Meulen).
Other chapters take a more school-based focus and draw on ethnographic and case study approaches to investigate: how Indian schoolgirls in Malaysia, where Indians are an ethnic minority, negotiate shifting ways of identifying as Malaysian-Indian schoolgirls across conceptions of âtraditionalâ and âwesternâ girl and academic success (Joseph); the discursive construction of class-differentiated femininity through school sport in two different types of school, one an Ă©lite girlsâ school and the other a government, co-educational school (Wright and OâFlynn); the experiences of young women who left school early and their reflections on their schooling in relation to discourses about choice and the âfreely choosing individualâ and intersections between gender and class (Allard); the positive impact that âsecond chanceâ colleges can have upon the educational experiences of young women who have previously been alienated from schooling and the specific relational features of schooling that can make a difference (te Riele).
In combination, the chapters address the macro-picture of national and international policy and research on the social and economic effects of educational and social exclusion, the construction, representation and stigmatization of young women who are socially and educationally marginalized, and the micro-picture of the biographical experiences of these diverse groups of young women who are negotiating their lives from multiple sites located on many different margins.
Chapter 2
âThe stigma that goes with living hereâ
Social-spatial vulnerability in poor neighbourhoods
Deborah Warr
Introduction
The rich and poor inhabit the same globalizing culture, but they increasingly live further apart from each other in different places with starkly contrasting environments, opportunities and constraints (Bauman 2000). Contemporary concern over the problem of social exclusion explicitly focuses attention on relational issues between those who participate in the arenas of social, economic and policy activity that constitute experiences of society and those who are disconnected and living at the margins. The spatial imagery that is evoked in concepts of social inclusion and exclusion has its corollary in the geographical patterning of socio-economic disadvantage. In Australian (Baum et al. 2005; Fincher and Wulff 2001; OâConnor et al. 2001) and international literature (Bauman 2000: Massey 1996), social geographers and sociologists note widening social-spatial polarization between the poor and not-poor.
In contrasting ways, the suburbs where the not-poor and poor live are each becoming highly recognizable and socio-spatial polarization is serving to constellate socio-economic disadvantage, and its consequences, in particular suburbs (see Vinson 2004). The transforming social geography of cities and neighbourhoods affects everybody, albeit in starkly different ways depending upon oneâs circumstances. My argument is that socio-spatial polarization is intensifying experiences of marginalization and stigmatization in poor neighbourhoods. The intensifying vulnerability of poor neighbourhoods, and the people who live in them, to being stigmatized and consequently marginalized is embedded in interpersonal, local and economic processes. The stigmatization of neighbourhoods has profound consequences for the people who live in them because it shrinks social networks, diminishes social opportunities and harms self-esteem (Dean and Hastings 2000; Lupton 2004; Palmer et al. 2004; Warr 2005). Challenging stigma requires understanding contemporary experiences of social and economic inequality, an awareness of how stigma is effected in commonplace attitudes and unthinking stereotypes and needs to be specifically addressed in local projects and place-based responses.
People like us
Historical accounts of Melbourneâs suburbs, such as Janet McCalmanâs (1984) study of Edwardian Richmond, an inner urban suburb of Melbourne, show that although class distinctions were evident in different streets and locales within neighbourhoods, they nonetheless remained largely bounded within local districts (or rural townships) (see also Dempsey 1990; Wild 1974). These days, the metropolis is more likely to resemble a mosaic of advantage and disadvantage, with constellations of poor, not-poor and wealthy neighbourhoods. In Australia, the work of social geographers confirms the ways in which neighbourhoods are separating out along social and economic lines (Baum et al. 2005). Economic restructuring has created new forms of work and employment and these are closely linked to the distribution of opportunity and vulnerability in Australian suburbs.
Opportunities and vulnerabilities that are generated through globalizing economies are unevenly distributed in urban and rural Australian neighbourhoods. Baum et al.âs (2005) typology of neighbourhood advantage and disadvantage outlines four characteristic neighbourhood contexts of advantage, and three of disadvantage. Advantaged localities tend to cluster around the central business district and a ring of middle-class suburbs that encircle the city or follow technology parks and other infrastructure critical to high-skill industries. Disadvantaged localities tend to be scattered on the edges of these suburbs and then radiate to the periphery of suburbia. Suburban sprawl since the 1980s has increasingly generated marginal suburban communities on the fringes of cities where the demographic characteristics of residents reflect mixtures of old vulnerabilities and new opportunities in global flows of capital. Disadvantage in these outer and metropolitan fringe areas arises through precarious employment opportunities and the limited provision of transport, social and other infrastructures. âOuter disadvantaged communitiesâ and âdisadvantaged old manufacturing economiesâ refer to those neighbourhoods that have been the most vulnerable to economic restructuring that has resulted in declining employment for low and unskilled workers.
Within prevailing macro-economic contexts, local processes are reinforcing trends towards social-spatial polarization at neighbourhood levels in a multitude of ways. Key issues were illustrated when a Melbourne newspaper reported on local tensions that were surfacing in response to state government policy initiatives that aimed to foster âsocial mixâ in inner city precincts. These initiatives were being vigorously opposed by many residents who objected to increasing the proportion of âaffordable housingâ (a euphemism for public housing) in their neighbourhood. A spokeswoman explained their objections in the following way: âthe sort of people who live in affordable housing are generally not the sort of people who sit out in the street, drinking coffee and eating bacon and eggs on a Saturday or Sunday morningâ (Khadem 2004). This inner-city suburb has good access to public transport, extensive shopping facilities, a range of health and social services and a pleasant aspect, being close to the seaside. In Baum et al.âs (2005: 03.2) schema the neighbourhood would be classified as a âgentrifying population change advantaged localityâ. The residents are nonetheless concerned that these advantages will be threatened by the inadequate consumption levels of the poor. Their concerns suggest, on one hand, how consumption has become an important element in securing experiences of social connection and social inclusion. Consumption practices such as visiting local cafĂ©s, as well as consuming products that display lifestyle and aesthetic preferences, are meaningful because they display forms of social connection and can be âreadâ by others. In these ways, consumption practices have socially integrative effects because they position and identify individuals as part of âcommunitiesâ or âtribesâ of like-minded people (Scerri 2002/3). On the other hand, those who cannot afford to consume are unwelcome in these neighbourhoods and excluded from these experiences of social connection.
If the poor are unwelcome in economically active neighbourhoods because their inabil...