eBook - ePub
Shakespeare and his Comedies
John Russell Brown
This is a test
Share book
- 256 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Shakespeare and his Comedies
John Russell Brown
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
First published in 1957. This edition reprints the second edition of 1962.The originality, vitality and variety of Shakespeare's comedies do not suggest a writer at ease with a formula which works to his own satisfaction and the pleasure of his audience; against first impressions they suggest an artist seeking to express an idea which is always eluding a completely developed presentation. The second edition of this book contains an extensive new chapter on Pericles, Cymbeline, The Winter's Tale and The Tempest.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Shakespeare and his Comedies an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Shakespeare and his Comedies by John Russell Brown in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & Literary Criticism. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
CHAPTER IX
The Life of the Last Comedies
There is no lack of interpretative criticism of Shakespeare's last comedies; rather it is the rule. Perhaps someone has yet to âread a philosophy into Shakespeareâ in any rigorous way, but during the last thirty or so years many have found in these plays, Pericles, Cymbeline, The Winter's Tale and The Tempest, a pattern of thought that is simple and constant. By outlining their plots, critics have shown that each involves birth, separation, tempest, remorse, penitence or patience, reconciliation and peace. By noting the juxtaposition of some scenes and recurrent phrases and ideas, they have argued that in all but Pericles civilization or art is contrasted with natural life or nature. Most persuasively, they have abstracted certain speeches which are straightforward in stating issues of life and death, and have drawn attention to their mutual echoes:
I am great with woe, and shall deliver weeping.
⌠O, come hither,
Thou that beget'st him that did thee beget;
Thou that wast born at sea, buried at Tarsus,
And found at sea again!
(Pericles, V. i. 107â99)
⌠did you not name a tempest,
A birth, and death?
(Ibid., V. iii. 33â4)
O, what, am I
A mother to the birth of three? Ne'er mother
Rejoiced deliverance moreâŚ
Thou hast lost by this a kingdom.
No, my lord;
I have got two worlds by't.
(Cymbeline, V. v. 368â74)
⌠thou mettest with things dying, I with things
new-bornâŚ.
(Winter's Tale, III. iii. 116â8)
Welcome hither,
As is the spring to the earthâŚ.
(Ibid., V. i. 151â2)
⌠they looked as they had heard of a world ransomed, or
one destroyedâŚ. (Ibid., V. ii. 16â7)
O, wonder!
How many goodly creatures are there here!
⌠O brave new world!
(Tempest, V. i. 181â3)
In one voyage
⌠Ferdinand⌠found a wife
Where he himself was lost, Prospero his dukedom
In a poor isle and all of us ourselves
When no man was his own.
(Ibid., V. i. 208â13)
More than anything else, these recurrent phrases have led critics to believe that they can pluck, with ease, the âmeaningâ, ideas or themes from the last comedies. They write with an assurance that fails them when discussing earlier plays: a serious, hortatory tone is heard contending that the âFinal Plays of Shakespeare must be read as myths of immortalityâ,1 or that the âcharacters in these late romances are less important as persons than as symbols and what they are is much less important than what they sayâ.1 In a recent book Mr Derek Traversi described the very insemination of these last plays in Shakespeare's mind and proceeded to define their meaning:
At the heart of each ⌠lies the conception of an organic relationship between breakdown and reconciliation, between the divisions created in the most intimate human bonds ⌠by the action of time and passion and the final healing of these divisions.
He discerned a âharmonizing themeâ which âproduces a conception of drama completely removed from realism and properly definable in symbolic terms.â2
Yet, remembering the subtle interrelations of the other comedies, we may be suspicious. These critics sound both too simple and too vague. Traversi's phrase, âthe conception of an organic relationship between breakdown and reconciliationâ, is neither clear nor agile enough to seem appropriate to the mind that shaped the earlier plays and had these qualities among others. Professor Wilson Knight's âmustâ seems too restrictive for the dramatist who finished Twelfth Night with Feste's riddling song and made the characters of Much Ado capable of several different interpretations. Such pronouncements as these have led Professor Clifford Leech to complain that âall the romances seem generally to inhibit thought in their readersâ.3 And a few dissentient voices strengthen our doubts. Dr D. G. James, in his Scepticism and Poetry (1937), discussed the symbolic meanings of these plays but added that they do not explain everything:
the symbols are there; but they rarely liberate compulsive significancies. We hover between apprehension of momentous significances, of a luxurious imagination, and of absurdities.1
Professor Kermode, while claiming that in The Tempest âShakespeare offers an exposition of the themes of Fall and Redemption by means of analogous narrativeâ, expressed a fear that his criticism had not done justice to the âcomplexâ in which the âelements of the pattern of ideas ⌠occurâ; âthey derive from each other meaningsâ, he declared, âwhich are beyond the last analysis of criticismâ.2 If this play is viewed against the wide pastoral tradition, as Professor Kermode has helped us to do, it suggests precise subtleties which do not accord with the statement of a simple theme. And The Tempest has yet another aspect, for many playgoers might feel some agreement with Professor Parrott roundly declaring that it was âprimarily meant to be a good show; it would be absurd to call it great dramaâ.3
Each of the last comedies offers a simple âmeaningâ to the critics, who seize upon it and seldom wait to look a second time at the whole play. Yet even some of those key passages which are resonant with great issues, when they are scrutinized afresh, may reveal qualities which a 'symbolicâ reading does not explain or appreciate:
did you not name a tempest,
A birth, and death?
has a movementâa hesitation and, perhaps, a final ease âwhich portrays embarrassment, courage and renewed confidence; and clearly this effect does not depend on symbols but on the imitation of the pulse of actual human speech. Or, again, the interplay of syntactical and metrical units in:
âŚfound a wife
Where he himself was lost, Prospero his dukedom
In a poor isle and all of us ourselves
When no man was his own
suggests a tension and, perhaps, a delicacy in the mind of the speaker which is at odds with its reception as a choric comment voicing a clear, central truth. We should beware of judging too hastily: such individualized qualities may not be impertinent to an imaginative acceptance of the dramatic life of these plays.
Because of our doubts and those of some earlier interpretative critics, our task is to recognize the patterns, statements and meanings which are obvious enough once they are looked for, and then proceed to detailed re-examination. So we may discover the same âmeaningsâ in other particulars, or further âmeaningsâ developed contrapuntally, or a judgement that is implicit in the whole but never developed towards a clear statement. Against immediate appearances, these comedies may be as difficult to interpret as the earlier ones.
* * *
Since the last comedies present narratives of personal relationships, we may approach them by using the terminology developed for the other comedies. The Winter's Tale is the most consistently concerned with love and friendship and will therefore be discussed in greatest detail. It was written in 1610, the third in order of composition but the first which is widely considered to be a complete artistic success.
The opening is talk between two courtiers. Giving information about Leontes King of Sicilia and Polixenes King of Bohemia, its obvious purpose is exposition. And interpretative critics have drawn attention to words like 'separationâ, a âvastâ or âopposed windsâ, and claimed that these serve to herald symbolic action. But this is only one of several possible readings: after a study of the earlier comedies we shall hear other matters. Camillo's reply to praise of Sicilian hospitalityââYou pay a great deal too dear for what's given freely' (I. i. 18â9)1âis a reminder of love's wealth, of mutual, unprompted giving in friendship. Or, again,
We will give you sleepy drinks, thatyour senses, unintelligent of our insufficience, may, though they cannot praise us, as little accuse us. (ll. 14â7)
speaks of a friend's response to free granting (âAnd for that riches where is my deserving?â2), and shows an awareness of different degrees of truth. This second theme is again echoed in 'Sicilia cannot show himself over-kind to Bohemiaâ (ll. 23â4) and âWherein our entertainment shall shame us we will be justified in our lovesâ (ll. 8â9). The description of the two friends:
they have seemed to be together, though absent, shook hands, as over a vast, and embraced, as it were, from the ends of opposed winds. (ll. 31â4)
speaks of more than tempests; it is also a reminder that love has its own order and that âtrueâ hearts never know complete separation. (So Claudio, in Much Ado, had rediscovered Hero in âhis study of imaginationâ3 or Valentine, in The Two Gentlemen, had found that Silvia âinhabited in his breastâ (V. iv. 7) when he was banished by her tyrant father to a 'shadowy desertâ and âunfrequented woodsâ.) In the opening scene of The Winter's Tale all these ideas crowd upon each other: the imagination and judgement that had informed the earlier comedies were at work in writing this complex duologue about personal relations.
B...