1 Introduction to Pharmacoeconomics
William F. McGhan, PharmD, PhD
Health Decision Strategies, LLC
Tampa, FL, USA
University of the Sciences
Philadelphia, PA, USA
RenƩe J.G. Arnold, PharmD, RPh
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Arnold Consultancy & Technology, LLC
New York, NY, USA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Analytical Perspectives
1.3 Code of Ethics
1.4 Overview of Economic Evaluation Methods
1.5 Quality of Life and Patient Preferences
1.6 Decision Analysis and Modeling
1.7 Ranking Priorities: Developing a Formulary List
1.8 Incremental Analysis and Quadrants
1.9 Fourth Hurdle and Drug Approvals
1.10 From Board Room to Bedside
1.11 Conclusions
References
1.1 Introduction
Practitioners, patients, and health agencies face a multitude of conundrums as the development of new therapies seems boundless; however, the funding for these cures is limited. How does one decide which are the best medicines to use within restricted budgets? The continuing impact of cost-containment is causing administrators and policy makers in all health fields to closely examine the costs and benefits of both proposed and existing interventions. It is increasingly obvious that purchasers and public agencies are demanding that health treatments be evaluated in terms of clinical and humanistic outcomes against the costs incurred.
Pharmacoeconomics is the field of study that evaluates the behavior or welfare of individuals, firms, and markets relevant to the use of pharmaceutical products, services, and programs [1]. The focus is frequently on the cost (inputs) and consequences (outcomes) of that use. Of necessity, it addresses the clinical, economic, and humanistic aspects of healthcare interventions in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of disease. Pharmacoeconomics is a collection of descriptive and analytic techniques for evaluating pharmaceutical interventions, encompassing the spectrum of individual patients to the healthcare system as a whole. Pharmacoeconomic techniques include cost-minimisation, cost-effectiveness, costāutility, costābenefit, cost of illness, cost-consequence, and any other economic analytic technique that provides valuable information to healthcare decision makers for the allocation of scarce resources. Pharmacoeconomics is often referred to as āhealth economicsā or āhealth outcomes research,ā especially when it includes (a) comparison(s) with non-pharmaceutical therapy or preventive strategies such as surgical interventions, medical devices, or screening techniques.
Pharmacoeconomic tools are vitally important in analyzing the potential value for individual patients and the public. These methods supplement the traditional marketplace value as measured by the prices that the patient or patron is willing to pay. With government agencies and third partiesā continuing concern about the higher expenditures for prescriptions, pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmacy managers are highly cognizant that pharmaceutical interventions and services require comparative cost-justification and continual surveillance to assure cost-effective outcomes [2ā5].
From pharmaceutical research, we have seen significant therapeutic advances and breakthroughs. From healthcare delivery entrepreneurs, we have seen numerous expanding roles for pharmacists, nurses, and physician assistants, with services such as home intravenous therapy, drug-level monitoring, parenteral nutrition management, hospice care, self-care counseling, and genetic screening for customizing therapy, among other innovations. The use of valid economic evaluation methods to measure the value and impact of new interventions can increase acceptance and appropriate use of such programs by third-party payers, government agencies, and consumers [2ā5].
There is increasing scrutiny over all aspects of health care as we attempt to balance limited finances and resources against optimal outcomes. Cost-effectiveness evaluations of pharmaceutical options are becoming mandatory for attaining adequate reimbursement and payment for services [2ā6]. Pharmacoeconomic methods document the costs and benefits of therapies and pharmaceutical services and establish priorities for those options to help in appropriately allocating resources in ever-changing healthcare landscapes and reimbursement environments/schema.
1.2 Analytical Perspectives
Point of view is a vital consideration in pharmacoeconomics. If a medicine is providing a positive benefit in relation to cost in terms of value to society as a whole, the service may not be valued in the same way by separate segments of society. For example, a drug therapy that reduces the number of admissions or patient days in an acute care institution is positive from societyās point of view but not necessarily from that of the institutionās administrator, who depends on a high number of patient admissions to meet expenses. Thus, one must determine whose interests are being served when identifying outcome criteria for evaluation. When considering pharmacoeconomic perspectives, one must always consider who pays the costs and who receives the benefits. A favorable economic analysis that showed savings in clinic utilization from the employer perspective would probably not be viewed positively from the clinicās budget perspective. More broadly, what is viewed as saving money for society may be viewed differently by private third-party payers, administrators, health providers, governmental agencies, or even the individual patient. Historically, it has been suggested among health economists that the societal perspective be discussed in an evaluative report, even though the focus of the report might deal with other segments such as hospitals or insurance agencies. Recent articles, books, and healthcare frameworks, however, discuss the importance of the individual payer perspective as well [5, 7]. Indeed, although the societal perspective is appropriate in single-payer countries, in the United States, with many different healthcare delivery and payer approaches, this can be complicated, and analyses are often done from multiple perspectives to assist adjudication by myriad stakeholders.
1.3 Code of Ethics
The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) has published a code of ethics that is vital to the honesty and transparency of the discipline [8]. The code encourages pharmacoeconomists to maintain the highest ethical standards because the organization recognizes that activities of its members affect many constituencies. These include but are not limited to: (1) patients, caregivers, and patientsā as...