1
DIVIDED AND ANGRY
Some politicians write a book to set the stage to run for another office. Others write a book to be a memoir of their time in office. While those are valid reasons to write a book, and there are many good examples of those books, I am writing this book for a different reason.
I am writing this book because, like you, I am deeply concerned about the direction of our country. I am also writing because, though the idea might sound farfetched to some, I think people of faith can and should play a leading role in healing the wounds of this country. Unfortunately, that is not what has been happening. Too often the words and actions of Christians have done more to inflict those wounds than to heal them. But there is a better way.
It is no secret that we live in a divided nation.
The last nine presidential elections have been decided by single-digit marginsâthe longest streak in the countryâs history. No presidential winner has received over 55 percent of the vote since 1984, and the new president has received less than 52 percent of the vote in seven out of the last eight elections.1 I do not see that changing anytime soon.
But we are not only divided; we are mad about it, and we cannot believe that the other side thinks the way they do. A January 2017 Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that one in six Americans had stopped talking to a family member or a close friend because of the 2016 election.2
Of course, political division is nothing new in our country. When Andrew Jackson was on his deathbed, he was asked if he had any regrets as he looked back on his life. Any who were expecting words of remorse, sympathy, or kindness would have been surprised by Jacksonâs purported reply. As the Congressional Record put it, âOld Hickory said he regretted he hadnât shot Henry Clay [the Speaker of the House] and hung John C. Calhoun [his own vice president].â3 Things were similar for Alexander Hamilton, now best known as the subject of a hit Broadway musical. The politics of his day were so divisive that he was shot and killed in a duel by Aaron Burr, the sitting vice president. And this was only after Hamilton had narrowly avoided a duel with fellow founding father and future president James Madison.
But these times are different, and our divisions feel deeper. When Jacksonâs protĂ©gĂ© James K. Polk was elected president, it took almost ten days for word of his electoral success to reach him at his home in Tennessee.4 Today, the presidentâs Twitter account can reach 100 million followers at the push of the Send button. Protests and counterprotests can be organized in the time it takes to compose an email or a text. A virtual protest can overwhelm a business or an individual before there is even time to organize a response. Every issue quickly takes on political undertones. A case in point is the COVID-19 pandemic. It did not take long before views on who was responsible for the outbreak and opinions on how to reopen the economy after the shutdown, and even whether or not to wear masks, took on strongly partisan tones.
Along with our division, and maybe at least partly due to that division, we see a growing concern about the direction of our society. The quality of our discourse continues to decline as people get used to hiding behind the anonymity and safety of the internet. As real community becomes a smaller part of our lives, many of us feel a growing sense of disconnection and decreasing hope for the future. We can see this played out in the rates of marriage and childbirth, two leading indicators of confidence in the future. The current marriage rate (6.5 unions for every 1,000 people) is the lowest since the federal government started keeping statistics right after the Civil War.5 The fertility rate of 1.7 is also the lowest on record.6 It takes a rate of 2.1 just to replace the population. And a larger percentage of births are happening outside of marriage. In 2016, estimates showed that about 40 percent of births in the United States occurred outside of marriage.7 And on and on the list of items of cultural concern can go, with the only variable being who is making the list.
ENTER THE PEOPLE OF FAITH
In the midst of this division and concern about the country stand people of faith, who increasingly feel as if they have lost their bearings in this new world. Culturally, many feel as if they are on the outside looking in. Politically, success at the ballot box has not translated into the changes that many believers had hoped for and expected.
As the country grows more divided, our views on religion have only increased the disagreement. Christians are more and more confused about what role they should play in the public square or whether they should even care about the public square. And there is increasing resentment from people who feel that religion has too large a role in our public life. Americans are now more likely to say that churches and other houses of faith have too much influence in politics rather than too little.
The church has not been an exception to Americansâ loss of faith in institutions of all kinds. Confidence in the church has sunk to an all-time low. And, as the church continues to lose influence on mainstream culture, more and more people think that its loss of influence might be good for the country.
Nowadays, the term evangelical is more likely to be identified as a voting block than a description of someone who desires to share the good news of grace found in the Gospels. And it is not just people outside the church who are wondering about the churchâs role in politics. Among Christians, the debate about âa Christian view of politicsâ has grown only more contentious. The large block of evangelicals that supported the Trump presidency led to sometimes-heated conversations between Christians. In December 2019, when Christianity Today editorialized in favor of the impeachment of President Trump, battle lines were drawn within evangelical ranks.8 This was the magazine founded by Billy Graham taking aim at political efforts led, in part, by his son Franklin Graham.
IS A FAITHFUL PRESENCE POSSIBLE?
The lines within the Christian community are as divisive as they are in the rest of the population. In a world where the political discussion has turned mean and contemptuous, and the political goal seems to be about keeping power rather than solving problems, Christians have frequently acted as mean and contemptuous as everyone else. Many Christians wonder if it is even possible to still have a faithful presence in the public debate. And those who still desire to be in the public square are left wondering what a faithful presence could look like in todayâs world.
I have served as a mayor and a governor. I have had a front-row seat and been a participant in politics and policy on local, state, and federal levels. My faith led me to make decisions that sometimes had my conservative friends upset with me and other times caused those on the left to rail against meâoccasionally in the same week.
Within the idea of âone nation, indivisibleâ is the reality that our lives as Americans are marked more by disagreement and difference than unity. All of us, regardless of whether we claim to be people of faith, bring our own views about truth, goodness, and purpose to the public arena. We all bring our beliefs with us as we address public issues and decisions. The challenge in America has always been in how we live together respectfully when all of us describe the common good, and even the purpose of government, in different ways.
HOW DO YOU GET INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL PROCESSâIN A FAITHFUL WAY?
Every man and woman has the right and responsibility to bring their most deeply held beliefs to the public square, where discourse, debate, and dialogue can flourish, as Lincoln said, âwith malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right.â9
How do we do that? Two leading Christian thinkers of our day, Tim Keller and John Inazu, expressed it this way:
The idea is that Christians, people who understand truth and compassion, should be able to show the world how to maintain kindness while expressing deepest differences, and thus help heal the deep divide in our country. I realize this is a preposterous idea to many people, Christians and non-Christians alike. But Christians have been called to be people of truth and love at the same time, even if we have often been guilty of having one without the other.
These times call for us to have a sound theology of political engagement so that our politics are driven by our faith, rather than our politics shaping our faith. All of us, whether we ever run for office or not, need a clear picture of what it means to be involved in the political process in a faithful way. But it rarely happens. My experience is that most Christians donât have a developed political theology, except for a position on a few issues like abortion, religious freedom, and gay marriage.
In other critical areas of lifeâmarriage, raising children, student life, work lifeâChristians are exposed to countless opportunities to develop their Christian view of that endeavor, such as books, videos, small-group studies, sermons, and more. The object of those teachings is usually on how to be salt and lightâto act faithfullyâin each of those particular areas rather than how to succeed in those areas at any cost. Student ministries focus on helping students live out their faith in todayâs challenging culture, not how to get a 4.0 on a report card. Discussions about a Christian view of business focus on our character and behavior in the marketplace, not how to get promoted or how to make your business a success.
Columnist David French wrote,
We slander our enemies on social media and pass along conspiracy theories as factsâbehavior we would never see as acceptable in a nonpolitical context. Then we excuse ourselves by saying that the outcomes of our politics are so important that we are justified in our actions. This is what happens when we donât have a theology for our politics that helps our actions match our beliefs.
A CALL THATâS CLEAR
This book is not just for people who are in public office or thinking about running for office. This book is for Christians who long to be salt and light in the public squareâpeople who care deeply about this country and its future and who want their political actions to be a reflection of their faith. It is also for those who donât consider themselves Christians and have doubts about whether people of faith can contribute to the common good. Given our recent history, itâs a legitimate concern. This book is for all of us who struggle to understand the right relationship between church and state, between our most deeply held beliefs and our role as citizens.
Christian or otherwise, red, blue, or purple, many of us are losing hope in a future that we once took for granted. There is a way for Christians to be at the center of restoring that lost hope. And it can happen in a way in which even nonbelievers will be glad to have us engaged in the public square.
As our country grows more polarized and people of faith become increasingly fearful about the growing secularization of the country, this is the right time to consider what it should look like for us to be engaged in the public square. It is my hope that Christians, in being faithful to the role God has called us to, will become people who help heal the political differences that are ripping our country apart. It is my hope that, rather than reacting out of fear of what we might be losing, we will engage as people who are committed to serving in the public square for the common good. While there will always be legitimate areas of disagreement among Christians in our political views, I am convinced that there are some things where our call is crystal clear.
Amid frustration over todayâs climate of partisan fights, not only is a faithful presence what Christians are called to have, but it can also be the answer to the hopelessness so many feel about our current political challenge. My hope is that this book will provide a vision for how Christians can become that answer. We will start with a look at our current political climate, the reasons behind our deep divisions and contempt for the other side, and the ways Christians have been shaped more by the partisan ideology of todayâs media and online life than by the formational practices of following Jesus.
We will then discuss whether or not a Christian response in todayâs world is realistic. Does having a faithful presence mean unilaterally disarming right when the stakes have never been higher in the public arena? Are humility and meekness nice ideas that donât really apply when we face opposition that is organized, formidabl...