Japan's first professionally produced, commercially marketed and nationally distributed gay lifestyle magazine, Barazoku ('The Rose Tribes'), was launched in 1971. Publicly declaring the beauty and normality of homosexual desire, Barazoku electrified the male homosexual world whilst scandalising mainstream society, and sparked a vibrant period of activity that saw the establishment of an enduring Japanese media form, the homo magazine. Using a detailed account of the formative years of the homo magazine genre in the 1970s as the basis for a wider history of men, this book examines the relationship between male homosexuality and conceptions of manliness in postwar Japan. The book charts the development of notions of masculinity and homosexual identity across the postwar period, analysing key issues including public/private homosexualities, inter-racial desire, male-male sex, love and friendship; the masculine body; and manly identity. The book investigates the phenomenon of 'manly homosexuality', little treated in both masculinity and gay studies on Japan, arguing that desires and individual narratives were constructed within (and not necessarily outside of) the dominant narratives of the nation, manliness and Japanese culture. Overall, this book offers a wide-ranging appraisal of homosexuality and manliness in postwar Japan, that provokes insights into conceptions of Japanese masculinity in general.
Trusted by 375,005 students
Access to over 1.5 million titles for a fair monthly price.
Homophobic discourses contain no fixed prepositional content. They are composed of a potentially infinite number of different but functionally interchangeable assertions, such that whenever any one assertion is falsified or disqualified another one â even one with a content exactly contrary to the original one â can be neatly and effectively substituted for it.
David Halperin (1995: 33)1
August 1971: homo b
mu and homo panic
The launch of Barazoku caused something of a sensation. No sooner had it hit the stands at the end of July 1971 than the homo sex it celebrated became the latest hot controversy in the national tabloid press. âD
seiai [homosexuality] is the ruin of the nationâ declared the Sh
kan Posuto (â âD
seiai wa kuni o horobosuâ â 1971: 43). The title of Weekly Pureib
iâs twelve-page full-colour special investigation was nowhere near as inflammatory but no less provocative either: âHOMOSEXUAL ⌠Itâs in you too!! The Homo Factorâ (HOMOSEXUAL 1971: 111). Not to be outdone, Heibon Panchi (âTakahashi Mutsuo no dankon sankaâ, 1971: 14), Sh
kan Asahi, and Tokyo Sup
tsu (It
1971a: 60) all put out feature articles in rapid succession while Sh
kan Bunshun focused on the man himself behind the furore, Barazoku founder It
Bungaku: The Standard Bearer of the Porno Era â The Homo Magazine Started by a Straight Man!â (âPoruno jidai no kishutachiâ 1971: 33â4).
Unsurprisingly given the medium, coverage of the homo issue was hardly elevated. Designed more to shock than inform, its style of journalism was sensationalist. It was with a tenor of moral doubt that the Sh
kan Bunshun article asked, âIs Barazoku for the betterment of society?â And, it was with an almost palpable sense of disbelief that it sought to reveal âwhy it has come about that a man who isnât homo has produced a homo magazineâ. As if to convince itself of the possibility that It
was indeed a man who had no carnal interest in men in spite of his magazine, nearly every reference to him stressed this fact repeatedly: homo de nai otoko â a non-homo man; It
-san jishin wa homo de wa nai â Mr It
himself is not homo; homo de mo nai hito â a person who isnât even a homo; and so on (Poruno jidai no kishutachi 1971: 33â4).
Debate was similarly presented in an unchallenging manner with nuance and subtlety giving way to the starkest of positions. Take for example Sh
kan Posutoâs âMagazine Courtâ case in which the readership was the judge. Cast in the role of the âplaintiffâ was Sugawara Michinari, President of the Association for the Eradication of the Three Vices (prostitution, venereal disease and drugs) and author of a pamphlet that he delivered to both houses of the National Diet calling for the criminalization of homo. Standing against him was the âdefendantâ T
g
Ken (1935 â present), the (in-) famous cross-dressing gei (gay, celebrity) political activist of the 1970s. âHomo is the behaviour of beastly lust that violates moralityâ accused Sugawara in the purple tones of moral indignation. âWhat utter nonsenseâ retorted the defendant T
g
in the affected campy drawl of the drag queen,
what in heavenâs name is he arguing about, saying that homo should be legally punished because they stray from morality? It is said nowadays that the world is one, this being the age of the universe when the ways of love are free. The plaintiffâs view of the world is a relic like a mummy, belonging to the past century.
(ââD
seiai wa kuni o horobosuââ 1971: 43â4)
Finally, in their bid to titillate, all the articles focused on the prurient and the irrelevant. Pureib
i was a case in point, dedicating its weekly âCool English Conversationâ column to a lesson on the language of gay oral sex: âNanshoku-ka to wa âfuebuki d
jiâ â, that is, âQueers are cocksuckersâ (Okuyama 1971: 70). While there may have been pedagogical value in the grammatical analysis of this articleâs model English statement of the week: âHis prick was tingling, his balls alive. He wanted to feel with glans that rush of hot sperm into his quivering assâ (ibid.: 70), it was nevertheless the case that much of what appeared in the tabloids in August 1971 was conducted with tongues deeply lodged in cheeks. At the butt end of these jokes, designed for the pleasures of a primarily male heterosexual readership, were, of course, homo.
It may have been the case that August 1971 witnessed what Heibon Panchi (âTakahashi Mutsuo no dankon sankaâ 1971: 13) called a homo b
mu (boom) ignited by the âcurious publicationâ of the homo magazine Barazoku. So great was all the hype that It
likened it to a tidal wave (interview with It
, 21 March 2002). Yet for all the sound and fury that appeared to make the b
mu truly explosive, it was an event that in the end seemed to signify very little. Homo and their new magazine did not really need to be taken seriously. Or did they?
Histories of homo-phobia
To a large extent, the flippant treatment of the homo issue by the tabloids can be attributed to this genreâs stylistic conventions. Excessive and parodic, its articles on homo were like individual scenes from the pantomime theatre, their primary purpose being to entertain and incite. Yet it is wrong, perhaps, to write off August 1971, the homo b
mu, and the commotion attending it as just another fleeting trend. Peel away the bravado, and the trivializing power of tabloid devices like hyperbole, pastiche and sarcasm dissipate to reveal a deeply felt aversion towards â panic even of â homo, a fear that operated at a number of historical levels: the short-term, a longer-term discursive and, most powerfully, the emotional.
Short-term history â postwar sexual propriety
From the perspective of the postwar era, the arguments raised against homo in the tabloids reflected a societal insecurity concerning sexual commodification and health. Consider, for example, the objections lodged against Barazoku by a member of the Youth Policy Department of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government:
Barazoku is presented as âYour and My Magazine of Friendshipâ, and as such, it may be easy for youth to obtain. It really is a frightening prospect if youth not yet fully mature read it and come to think of the homo world as natural. If this results in the escalation of sexual expression, it should be designated an unwholesome book without further ado.
(âPoruno jidai no kishutachiâ 1971: 34)
Or, Sugawaraâs indictment against homo sexual practices:
If you look at the main investigations on venereal disease which the Osaka Prefecture Public Health Bureau conducted, the cases in which it is spread by homosexuals are increasing greatly. This is a really alarming trend. (ââD
seiai wa kuni o horobosuââ 1971: 43)
The tactic of each argument is quite different with the former wielding the incendiary power of speculation and the latter making appeals to apparently incontrovertible quantified evidence. Nevertheless, both can be understood to be mutually supportive since they are expressions coming directly out of a wider debate concerning sexual morality that finds its roots in some of the civic activism of post-Occupation Japan.
Galvanized by a new democratic ethos, many in Japan, and women in particular, mobilized themselves into sometimes quite powerful lobbying organizations (Koyama 1961: 135â6). One of the most important groups was the 1954 All-Japan Congress for Anti-Prostitution Reforms, whose efforts were in part responsible for the passage of anti-prostitution legislation in 1956 (Buckley 1994: 153). The attempt to rein in sexual indecency through the restriction of the commodification of sex was not limited to prostitution, and in the two decades following thereafter, attention was turned to pornography. In the mid-1960s, as a result of an anti-manga (comic book) movement, laws were tightened concerning the sale to minors under the age of eighteen of materials like manga, which contained pornographic imagery (Kinsella 2000: 142â3). In the 1970s, pornography, which nearly doubled in the number of its titles (Diamond and Uchiyama 1999), and prostitution, in the form of overseas sex tours, proved to be some of the most contentious issues that grass-roots and other organizations attempted to tackle (Yunomae 1996: 102â9; Okura 1996: 112).
While civic activism may be explained in terms of Japanâs unique interpretation and practice of popular democracy as autonomy and responsibility, it is not necessarily the case that all its groups were progressive. Sandra Buckley notes of the All-Japan Congress for Anti-prostitution Reforms, for example:
While the groupâs stated goal was the elimination of the exploitation of prostitutes, this was widely perceived to be a very conservative or...
Table of contents
Routledge Contemporary Japan Series
Contents
Illustrations
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Part I Producing homo
Part II Confessions
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Frequently asked questions
Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription
No, books cannot be downloaded as external files, such as PDFs, for use outside of Perlego. However, you can download books within the Perlego app for offline reading on mobile or tablet. Learn how to download books offline
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1.5 million books across 990+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn about our mission
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more about Read Aloud
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS and Android devices to read anytime, anywhere â even offline. Perfect for commutes or when youâre on the go. Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app
Yes, you can access Homosexuality and Manliness in Postwar Japan by Jonathan D. Mackintosh in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in History & Japanese History. We have over 1.5 million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.