TEN CRUCIAL QUALITIES OF HIGH-CHARACTER EMPLOYEES
CHAPTER 1
So shines a good deed in a weary world.
âWilly Wonka to Charlie, after the boy makes a difficult but honest choice, in Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (originally from Shakespeareâs Merchant of Venice)
After the closure of the furniture factory where she had been working for twenty years, Brenda Harry found a minimum-wage job at the Goodwill Store and Donation Center in Pearisburg, Virginia (population 2,786). Her job was to process clothes and other items that people deposited in collection boxes around town. She made sure that they were in good condition and that the donors hadnât left anything in the clothing. Most of the time the pockets were empty, but one day in January 2014, she discovered four envelopes inside a suit jacket.
Those envelopes contained $3,100 in cash. This was more than she made in two months of full-time work at Goodwill. If she had pocketed it, no one would have known. But Brenda Harry immediately turned the money over to her supervisor.
When Deb Saunders, chief compliance officer for Goodwill of the Valleys, told me this story, I wanted to know why Brenda didnât keep the money for herself. So I called Brenda and asked her. âI was raised to be honest,â she told me. It was that simple. âIt doesnât matter if you need the money. Itâs not yours. So you turn it in. My parents told me that if youâre honest, you will get your reward at the end of time. If youâre not honest, you will pay for it on Judgment Day.â
Itâs hard to know how many people would do what Brenda did, because the sort of people who would keep the money might not report doing so. It doesnât even matter, really. What does matter is that smart employers hire people like Brenda Harry, because they can trust her.
All of the ten qualities weâll examine in this book are hallmarks of high-character employees, but honesty is the most important one. No matter how knowledgeable or skilled a person may be, if he or she is fundamentally dishonest or doesnât value honesty, that person is detrimental and possibly even dangerous.
What isnât immediately obvious is how honest employees benefit the organization. In some cases, a business can quantify a benefit; the Goodwill store in Pearisburg had $3,100 added to its monthly revenue when no one claimed the money that Brenda turned in. But there are other ways that honest employees are a boon to a business, as weâll see.
What Is Honesty?
Honesty is above all a feeling, a disposition, an orientation toward the truth. Honest employees cannot tolerate lying, fudging data, misrepresenting themselves or their companies, or other conduct that displays contempt for the truth. Falsehood in all its forms is a poison to an honest person.
Refusing to Fudge Data
Well before she became senior vice president for strategy and business development at Xerox, Cari Dorman worked as an electrical engineer for a company that had been awarded a contract with the U.S. Navy. Her role was to develop a software program that would measure the likelihood that a transmitted electronic message had reached its intended target. Cariâs boss â Iâll call him Saul â asked her to change some data in her research because the results were not what Saul wanted or hoped they would be. Cari did not want to because of the potential implications and did not make the changes.
âI knew that standing up to Saul might get me fired,â Cari told me. âBut I asked myself, âWhat if my son were in the navy during a war, and he was relying on my software program for knowing whether a message he sent got through or not?ââ With lives on the line, Cari was willing to risk her job for the sake of doing honest research. Her passion for the telling truth and her courage to be true to herself makes her one of the Good Ones.
For reasons Cari doesnât know, Saul eventually was asked to take a cut in pay, and he left the company.
Standing Up to a Dishonest Vendor
Honest employees are truthful employees. Ken Meyer, vice president of human resources at Community Health Services in New York City, told me how an employeeâs passion for the truth potentially saved lives, certainly vanquished a cheater, and changed the way Ken runs employee orientation sessions.
Marvin was the new director of the fire safety department at a large company where Ken used to work. When he was going through the contracts from various vendors, Marvin noticed that the one who supplied the companyâs many fire extinguishers had never inspected them. Marvin called the vendor, Bill, to find out what was going on.
âYouâre supposed to inspect them,â Bill said.
âUm, no Iâm not. Thatâs your job,â Marvin replied.
Bill then explained how previous fire safety directors had handled the issue. âAll you have to do, Marvin, is go through the building, take a look at the extinguishers, and make a note on where you checked the extinguisher,â Bill said. âThen count how many you inspected, let me know how many there are, and Iâll send you a check.â
âWait a minute,â Marvin said. âYouâre telling me that after I inspect our fire extinguishers, youâll send a check to me, not to my company?â
âThatâs right,â Bill stated, presumably expecting Marvin to exclaim, âSign me up!â But thatâs not how Marvin responded.
Instead he said, âAll right, I canât attest to what happened before me, but immediately two things have to happen. Number one, you have to send people to inspect these fire extinguishers. Number two, if you ever suggest anything dishonest like that to me again, I am going to drop you like a bad habit and youâll never get work here again.â
Imagine an employee lighting a small candle on a birthday cupcake intended for a coworker. The employee blows out the match and tosses it into a wastepaper basket thatâs half full. As he leaves his desk to deliver the treat to his coworker, that match, which is still smoldering, rapidly ignites the contents of the trash can.
This is the kind of problem that fire extinguishers are meant to solve, but if Marvin hadnât stood up to the corrupt vendor, and the nearest fire extinguisher wasnât functional, what might have happened? How many lives would have been permanently altered by a building fire, and how much damage would the business have sustained? What would the companyâs legal liability have been when the reason for the faulty extinguisher was discovered? How would its reputation have been tarnished, and what would it take to win it back? All of these questions would arise simply because a fire extinguisher wasnât properly maintained.
Marvin told Ken why he did what he did. âKen, you want to live your life never having to worry about the knock on the door. As in the knock from someone about to say, âSomething came to my attention that I need to discuss with you. Can you please step into my office and explain something to me?â For what would be a relatively small amount of money, you find yourself fired, not collecting unemployment because itâs misconduct, and trying to find a job after something like that.â
âTo this day, in employee training I repeat what Marvin said all the time,â Ken told me. âConducting yourself ethically frees up your mind. Not having to worry about the knock on the door gives you peace of mind while youâre at work.â
The events in this story took place decades ago. Marvin is no longer a fire safety officer. He is an ordained Roman Catholic priest and is the pastor of the parish where he lives.
Being Prudent about Telling the Truth
Doris, a senior manager at an automotive parts company, told me a problem she had had recently with her boss, Melanie. âIâve known Melanie for years,â Doris told me, âand we have a good relationship. Melanie has always encouraged me to speak my mind to her, and I decided it was time to tell her about something that had been bothering me about her for a while.â
âWhat was that?â I asked.
âWell, Melanie has a tendency to tell stories that go on forever. Or at least they seem to. Itâs more annoying than anything else. And Iâm not the only one who feels that way.â
âUh oh,â I said. It wasnât hard to see what was coming.
âYes, I told her. And I added that other people feel the same way, but nobody had the nerve to tell Melanie.â
âWhat happened?â
âIt was as if Iâd slapped her on the face. She just stared at me for what seemed like an eternity. Then she told me to leave her office. I felt terrible and couldnât sleep that night. The next day I apologized. I didnât even try to justify what I said. I know it was wrong for me to tell her it wasnât just me who thought she has a tendency to ramble. That wasnât my place. And I honestly thought I was doing her a favor. I mean, Iâd want people to tell me if they thought I talk too much.â
Melanie accepted Dorisâs apology. Their friendship cooled a bit after that, but it has since recovered.
âI suppose I could have found a better way to tell her the truth,â Doris said. I told Doris about the praise-sandwich technique of giving criticism, in which you begin with something sincere but flattering, after which you mention the behavior that bothers you, and you end with something positive.
âMaybe that would work,â Doris told me, âbut that could also backfire. Just because Melanie says she wants me to speak my mind with her doesnât mean she wants to hear criticism about herself. I do think she needs to be mindful of our time, but her storytelling style is something I guess weâll just have to put up with.â
In the introduction, I mentioned that my concept of character is derived from the work of Aristotle. One of the critical components of character for Aristotle is phronesis, a Greek word that is usually translated as âpractical wisdomâ or âprudence.â Itâs what Kenny Rogers sings about in Don Schlitzâs song âThe Gamblerâ: knowing when to hold âem, knowing when to fold âem, knowing when to walk away, and when to run.
Doris learned the hard way that just because people say they want you to be honest with them doesnât mean they want to hear about their shortcomings. Doris is now more careful with how truthful she is with her boss about Melanieâs bothersome traits.
âBesides,â Doris added, âIâll bet there are things I do that annoy Melanie that she doesnât tell me about.â
Most of the time, honesty is a sign of high character. But, as weâll see throughout this book, high-character employees know when to exhibit a particular quality and when to keep it to themselves.
The Consequences of Dishonesty
Ripping Off Restaurants: Considering a Single Dishonest Act
Jerry Seinfeld once said, âA date is a job interview that lasts all night.â I wish Iâd kept that observation in mind during a date I had early in a relationship with a woman Iâll call Penny.
It was my birthday, and Penny took me out to dinner at an upscale restaurant. We began the evening at the bar, but our table was ready before weâd finished our drinks. The hostess told us she would take our drinks to the table and have the bar tab transferred to the check. We finished our meal, the check arrived, and lo and behold, the drinks werenât listed.
âI guess theyâre a gift!â Penny said in all seriousness. I told her that didnât seem likely, but because it was early in our relationship, and I didnât want to start an argument, I let it slide. I wasnât comfortable with that decision, because we were stiffing both the restaurant and the bartender, who wouldnât be getting a tip.
Pennyâs decision to get two drinks for the price of none was a red flag that turned out to be indicative of her character. Quick to anger, she criticized me frequently and often used personal attacks to make her point. She had no tolerance for criticism when she was on the receiving end. She rarely came to my defense when others treated me poorly.
Of course, she had positive qualities too, and Iâm far from perfect. My flaws, however, donât include stealing, which is what Pennyâs choice in the restaurant amounted to. Since Jerry Seinfeld is right in likening a date to a job interview, employers who ignore red flags such as evidence of dishonesty do so at their peril.
The Convict and the Firing Range: Enduring Repercussions of Dishonest Acts
âDad, will you go to the firing range with me?â Chuck Gallagherâs son asked him one day. âWhy not?â he responded. Chuckâs son had recently bought a pistol and was looking forward to spending some time with his dad at target practice. But when father and son got to the gun range, they were shocked by what they encountered.
âNot only can you not touch a gun here,â said the clerk to Chuck after asking a few routine questions, âbut you also canât pay for your son to be here. In fact, youâll have to leave.â
Chuck wasnât expecting such a hostile encounter, but he admits he shouldnât have been surprised. Thatâs because Chuck is a convicted felon, and losing the privilege to enter a firing range is one of the consequences of his conviction.
In 1986, when he was in his mid-twenties, Chuck had a successful career as a CPA, and his thorough knowledge of what was then ...