1
The Christian Mind of C. S. Lewis
Andrew J. Spencer
There is something about the character of C. S. Lewis that encourages happiness in fellowship and renewal of spirit. Some people read trendy novels for their popularity, but many of those who read Lewis do so in order to read other books better. Lewisâs books provide a more compelling attraction than mere popularity. Lewis is read widely for many reasons, but those who read him deeply and frequently do so to meet with a mind that has encountered Christ.
It would be difficult to quantify Lewisâs popularity. In some circles he is more popular than he ought to be, especially when his books are perceived as the final destination for studying literature. Though Lewisâs work is excellent, there is little question he would be surprised at the focus he receives in some Christian circles. Lewisâs work certainly deserves high praise, but those who have read him well recognize he is helpful in teaching readers how to think so they can read other literature better. He is pointing toward something beyond himself.
It is the Christian mind of C. S. Lewis that should be so very interesting. That mind is revealed on the pages of his various works. The books, essays, and poems that he wrote have profound interest to many because they direct the readerâs attention to something deeper, richer, and truer than anything seen or heard in this life.
Lewis is a less polarizing figure than many other Christian writers of enduring popularity, though Lewis did hold many strong opinions. John Calvin, Martin Luther, Origen, Augustine of Hippo, and others are more doctrinally significant to the history of the church because of their theological contributions, but their work tends to be much more divisive. For example, some groups love John Calvin, while others despise him. He is enduringly popular in some circles and was highly prolific, but his appeal is much narrower than Lewisâs. In fact, one of the intriguing aspects of Lewisâs enduring popularity is that he seems to appeal to Christians of nearly all theological traditions. It is not unheard of for even secularists to find Lewisâs work attractive, though I am not certain how long one can resist the siren call of the gospel in Lewisâs imaginative and expository works. Nevertheless, Lewis is read by a broad coalition of scholars, clergy, and laypeople.
Many recent treatments of the life and work of C. S. Lewis begin with speculation about his enduring popularity. Alister McGrath begins his book, The Intellectual World of C. S. Lewis, by offering three reasons why Lewis remains popular: (1) the continued value of his apologetic work; (2) his religious appeal; and (3) his use of imagination in defense of the faith. Michael Travers agreed with McGrath, but added his own considerations, writing:
Travers reflects on something most people interested in Lewis sense, but have a difficult time expressing: our interest in C. S. Lewis is partially driven by the mind of the person who wrote so beautifully about such important things. Many of us are interested in Lewis because he exemplified the Christian mind in what he wrote.
It is highly likely that Lewis would have winced at this reason for ongoing interest in his work. After all, this is the man who repeatedly rejected the notion that literature should be interpreted through the biography of the author, especially in his dialogue with E. M. Tillyard in The Personal Heresy. And yet, it is unquestionable that the ongoing interest in Lewis is driven nearly as much by the worldâs fascination with something about the man as by enjoyment of his writing. The perpetual stream of biographies about Lewis is evidence of the worldâs interest in Lewisâs personal history. But the Christian mind is both personal and super-personal. It is embodied by individuals, like C. S. Lewis, but it is also transcendently super-personal because it relies on a common relationship to the great mind of the creator God.
Lewis embodies the Christian mind because he brings the world together into a cohesive unity. He was one of several people who seemed to embody the Christian mind in his time. Others on this list include T. S. Eliot, Dorothy L. Sayers, and other Christian humanists from the early twentieth century. We might also include luminaries like Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas, and Abraham Kuyper on this list. These are people who, despite diverse theological backgrounds, seem to have seen the unity in the universe and meaningfully engaged with the Mind that first imagined the created order. This comes through in the pages of their books, which seem to be alive in such a way that enlivens the mind of the reader. The common thread running through all of their work is the vibrant life of the Christian mind.
This volume of essays, written in honor of Michael Travers, centers on the theme of the Christian mind of C. S. Lewis. The essays collected here explore some of the contours of Lewisâs own intellectual history. More significantly, they try to show where Lewis is pointing and how he directs readersâ attention to the things toward which he points.
It is impossible to write about Lewis without dealing with his biography, since his life and work were so inextricably linked. However, the biographical content in this volume is used to show where Lewis stood. As Christian authors seeking to point others to the same truths Lewis saw, we are attempting to see how he got to the place from which he pointed. The essays in this volume consider both topics, often simultaneously, in an effort to explore the Christian mind of C. S. Lewis and help others come closer to approximating the Christian mind in their own lives.
The Christian Mind
In his 1963 book, Harry Blamires flatly states, âThere is no longer a Christian mind.â Such a grim diagnosis might seem to undermine the premise of this volume and raise contentious questions about the future of the church. However, Blamires went on to qualify his statement, writing, âThere is still, of course, a Christian ethic, a Christian practice, and a Christian spirituality.â In context, Blamires is offering two specific criticisms of Christianity writ large. First, most Christians fail to integrate their faith with all areas of knowledge. Due to this failure, many do not think primarily as citizens of the kingdom of God, but instead function mainly as citizens of their nation, their time, and their cultural context. They may claim their identity is primarily in Christ, but that is not always visible in the way they live their lives, speak to others, spend their money, and engage in political activism. To see that his diagnosis is largely correct, one need only observe the drift of self-identified Christians toward blind acceptance of sexual revisionism, of reductionistic materialism in science and economics, and of the prevale...