Chapter 1: Introduction
1.0 Problem and Purpose
Who is God? The Bible may be read as one or several accounts of experiences of an acting God, a God whose agency brings God into contact with humanity and constitutes a history of Godās saving works. Regardless of whether one conceives of the Bible as presenting several, multifaceted images of God, or one unified image, each book of the Bible adds to what has become the canonical witness to God in the church. To explore the Bibleās discourse(s) of God is, therefore, to enter into dialogue with texts that still inform peopleās understanding of God today. At a fundamental level, this is what the following study aims to do in looking at the characterization of God in The Acts of the Apostles.
The Acts of the Apostles is the only book āin the New Testament to narrativize how the God of Israel becomes the God of all.ā It thus offers a valuable foundation for studying one of the New Testamentās presentations of God. Acts reveals a God at work. Indeed, as we shall see, Godās actions are of such central importance to this book that a more fitting name might have been āThe Acts of God.ā In Acts, God is presented as the agent of Jesusās resurrection (e.g., Acts 2:24; 3:15; 4:10; 5:30; 10:40; 13:30, 37; 17:31), as being behind the promises to Israel and the early church (e.g., 1:4ā5; 2:30, 33, 39; 7:5; 13:23, 32; 26:6ā7), and as a helper in the apostolic mission (e.g., 2:47; 15:7ā9). God frequently becomes a starting point in the apostlesā proclamation to both Jews and gentiles (2:17; 3:13; 5:29ā30; 7:2ā3; 10:34ā36; 13:17; 14:15; 17:22ā24), and is the initiator of the mission to the gentiles (Acts 10:1ā11:18). In short, Godās past and continued works are portrayed to be of the highest significance to the activities of the followers of the Way and the spread of the gospel. At the same time, the one whom we here call āGod,ā and who in Acts appears under the various designations of āLordā (ĪŗĻĻιοĻ, ΓεĻĻĻĻĪ·Ļ), āGodā (θεĻĻ), āhighestā (į½ĻιĻĻĪæĻ), and āFatherā (ĻαĻĪ®Ļ), frequently acts through others, and is not always easily distinguished from Jesus, who is also called āLordā (ĪŗĻĻιοĻ) in Acts. In sum, it is quite clear that God is at work in Acts. At the same time, because Godās actions are often mediated, and God and Jesus not always easily distinguished from each other, the text invites the active participation of the reader in discerning where and how God is at work.
As we shall soon see, several scholars have made a note of the centrality of God in Acts. Fewer scholars, however, have asked for a more comprehensive image of God in Acts. In fact, in Centering on God (1990), Robert L. Brawley asserts that a search for a so-called epitomization of Godās character in Luke-Acts would be a futile venture:
The character of God in Acts is, as Brawley notes, indeed complex. In Acts, there is a dialectic between the āomnipresenceā of Godās character, whose hand may be seen behind the development of the Jesus movement, and the emergence of Godās character through specific events. An investigation into the characterization and portrayal of God in Acts can therefore never hope to fully epitomize that character, but must make its investigation in the tension between the āactor behind the scenesā and the concrete actions mentioned or narrated in the story. Yet I would argue that this search nevertheless remains worthwhile: In seeking to understand how the text speaks of God lies the potential for both (re)new(ed) understanding and confrontation with our own preconceptions of whom this God is presented as.
Among recent scholars on Acts, Daniel L. Marguerat is one of two who have explicitly sought to examine the image of God in Acts. He notes that while previous research has enumerated the characteristics given to God in the Lukan narrative, it has not paid sufficient attention to the narrative form through which the image of God is constructed. The present work takes these observations as its point of departure. It aims to further the scholarly conversation on God in Acts by answering the following question: How is God portrayed through Godās actions in the Acts of the Apostles? In answering this question, I offer a narrative-critical analysis that aims to pay attention not only to what is said about God in Acts, but also to the unique manner of how and where Godās character is presented through Godās actions, so as to bring out a portrayal of who this God is.
Two things in particular make the image of God in Acts distinctive: 1) the impact of Jesusās character on the characterization of God, and 2) the development of a gentile mission. As the following survey will demonstrate, previous scholarship has done much to bring God and Godās actions in Acts to the fore. However, even though it is frequently noted that the God of Israel becomes the āGod of allā in Acts, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the question of how Acts itself presents God through Godās actions in Israelās past in comparison with how this God is depicted in Israelās present. The present study seeks to remedy this neglect.
While our main question seeks to discover how God is portrayed through Godās actions in Acts, two further questions shape the focus of our investigation: 1) In what ways do the actions and characterization of God in the story-time relate to the actions of God spoken of in Jesusās life and ministry and Israelās more distant past? and 2) How does Jesusās ascension into heaven impact the characterization of God? Through its analyses of the characterization of God through Godās actions, this book demonstrates how the answers to these questions are key to the distinctive portrayal of God in Acts. We will return to these questions towards the end of this chapter. First, however, we will situate the study in relationship to previous research on God in Acts.
1.1 Research History
The present study stands in a tradition of New Testament research focusing on God. In the last four decades, a number of articles and monographs have responded to Nils Alstrup Dahlās famous claim that God is the neglected factor in New Testament theology. Upon analyzing the situation, Dahl suggested that there are three main reasons why āit is hard to find any comprehensive or penetrating studyā on this theme: a dominating Christocentric perspective on the New Testament, the existence of few thematic formulations about God in the New Testament, and the fact that God is only referred to āin contexts that deal with some other theme.ā Scholars who seek to write about New Testament theo-logy today still face these challenges. However, Dahlās original claim that God is neglected in New Testament theology no longer rings true. In the years following the publication of Dahlās article, a number of scholars have sought to redress the situation and recover āGodā as a central topic in New Testament research. The result has been a growing appreciation of the importance of t...