1
Assumptions about God
In upcoming chapters, I will address the genesis of the images of sacrificial atonement and ransom. For now, I can mention that our earliest source for the sacrificial and purchase metaphors for the death of Jesus is the Apostle Paul, who was writing in the 50s AD. Paul is also the source of that extremely unfortunate slogan: âyou were bought with a priceâ (1 Cor 6:20; 7:23). Paulâs successors took his metaphors quite literally, blending the notion of sacrifice with the image of ransom and coming up with the idea of the death of Jesus as a ransom payment for the sins of humanity, the idea called âatonementâ in theological circles.
In this chapter, I want to respond to the idea of atonement that is popular today, by contrasting it with the teachings of Jesus. My argument is less with Paul than with his more literal-minded successors, and with the crude atonement ideas that developed over time. It is the purchase concept that is most problematic.
The main problem with teaching that Jesusâ death paid for human sin is that it slanders the character of God the Father! If God was either unable or unwilling to forgive without a payment in blood, then God was either weak or cruel. Both are false. God was not compelled to demand that a payment for sin be made, nor was God defending Godâs honor. Such ideas emerge when people apply human laws and attitudes to God.
âSomebody had to payâ is based on a series of mistaken assumptions. One is that God is stern and demanding, while Jesus is merciful and kind. This goes against Jesusâ own teachings about his similarity to the Father: âJust as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life . . . Whoever has seen me has seen the Fatherâ (John 5:21; 14:9). There is no spiritual contrast between the Father and the Son; they have the same love. This is the good news: there is a circuit of love that flows from the Father, through the Son, to the Spirit, into us, and then among us.
Of course, no Christian wants to say that God is either cruel or weak. Yet Christians commonly fall into that trap unawares, accepting formulas that Christian authorities have told them they must believe, usually accompanied with a fierce and angry energy. Most believers follow their leaders. Instead, we should reflect upon what we have been taught, and see if it needs to be questioned, in the light of Jesusâ own focus on love and forgiveness. What did Jesus himself teach about salvation?
Salvation Now
Jesus made it clear, in his preaching and his ministry to people, that the kingdom of God has come; it is here. Jesus built people up spiritually and told them they were already saved by their exercise of faith. There are seven times in the Gospels where he tells people âyour faith has saved you,â even when he has performed a miraculous healing for them. I am counting the times the NRSV renders it âfaith has made you well,â as well as the times they translate the same verb as âhas savedâ (Matt 9:22; Mark 5:34; 10:52; Luke 7:50; 8:48; 17:19; 18:42). The verb is ÏÏÎ¶Ï (sĆzĆ), which has the primary meaning of âsaved.â In all seven passages, the verb occurs in the perfect tense (sesĆken), so it actually means âhas saved.â The choices âmade wellâ or âmade wholeâ make sense in their context, but so does âsaved,â and I prefer to stay closer to the verbâs primary meaning.
By no means am I arguing that people are self-saving. That would be too rigid a reading of âyour faith has saved you.â Rather, Jesus is generously giving them credit for their faith, and their role in receiving salvation. Actually, salvation results from both the divine downreach and the human upreach: the coming together of Godâs love (embodied by Jesus) and a personâs sincere and faithful plea. Jesus does do miracles of healing, but he likes to lift people up and include them. He acknowledges their receptivity to the act when he says âyour faith has saved you.â Jesus certainly is the Savior and the Healer, but he likes to emphasize the human end of the divine-human connection.
Throughout the Gospels, Jesus saves people, and tells them they are saved. Without any reference to his coming death, without any substitutionary (taking the place of others) doctrine, he makes it clear that peopleâs faith has already saved them. Again, the way to salvation and eternal life is wide open. Salvation is made available here and now, whenever people âhear the word, hold it fast in an honest and good heart, and bear fruit with patient enduranceâ (Luke 8:15; see also 8:21; 11:28). Notice how crucial is the âhonest and good heartââthe sincerity of the person. Anyone who honestly recognizes the need for salvation can receive it.
Jesus is the Savior, not because of his death, but because of his divine identity, his power as Creator. He is the one who gave us life in the first place: âThrough him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankindâ (John 1:3â4 NIV); âin him all things in heaven and on earth were createdâ (Col 1:16). Jesus is the Savior in exactly the same way that he is the Creator (âhe also created the worlds,â Heb 1:2). He was the life-giver in the beginning, and he is the eternal life-giver now.
Jesus extends salvation just as he extended healing. In fact, the main images for salvation in the Gospels are healing and restoration. His healings were a gift of life, or a restoration of healthy life, and salvation is the gift of eternal life. Jesus was the life giver before he ever came to earth in human form. There is no magic in the crucifixion; he did not become the Savior only after he was murdered. He was the Savior from the start. In fact: âIn a sense, we were saved by Christ before he was born.â
Salvation and forgiveness truly are the free gifts of God, not something purchased with blood. The problem with the blood-purchase concept is not what it says about Jesus, but what it says about God. It pictures God as harshly judgmental, and also corrupt: needing a victim, but willing to be satisfied with an innocent victim. What good is it to see Jesus as kind and good, if we see God as sadistic, corrupt, or weak?
There is something not quite healthy in the obsession with blood, as seen in Billy Graham, for instance: âBlood redeems . . . Blood cleanses . . . His blood pumps through your spiritual veins with eternal life . . . Blood justifies . . . Jesus paid for our sins with His blood.â William Placher wrote âChrist is our sacrifice. His ...