1
Introduction
1.0 Thesis
To survey harsh criticisms against Brian Douglas McLaren (1956â), readers gain the inaccurate impression that he is a heretical relativist who denies objective truth and logic. While McLarenâs inflammatory and provocative writing style is partly to blame, this study also suspects that his critics base much of their analyses on only small portions of his overall corpus. The result becomes a caricature of McLarenâs actual philosophy of religion. The thesis of this book is simple: McLaren is, in fact, a rationalist and empiricist, who utilizes irony, humor, generalization, and ridicule to disturb those expressions of faith common to mainstream, Western institutional Christianity (i.e., âconventional Christian paradigmsâ). The difference is that McLaren is an abductive rationalist and a phenomenological empiricist, who objects to the Enlightenmentâs over emphasis on analytical rationalism because it overlooks ethereal elements such as intuition, mysticism, and personal experience. This âanalyticâ approach to religion has since created ânotionalâ Christians who focus almost entirely on cerebral and abstract elements of faith while ignoring its real-world impact on daily living (cf. GO §13, 205; SMJ §4, 34). This study will show that what appear to be the musings of an unlearned and unnuanced writer are actually the tactics of a skilled rhetorician trying to expose the limitations (and even impropriety) of an overly analytic approach to faith. Indeed, McLarenâs goal is to establish a robust paradigm through which believers can acquire more than just knowledge; they can live in solidarity with creation and Creator, as well. There will be three main divisions to support this thesis.
1.0.1 Outline of the Study
In the first division, this study will catalog several socio-historical influences that were vital to McLarenâs philosophical development. For example, chapter 2 will detail different biographical experiences, chapter 3 will describe his moral identity crisis, and chapter 4 will trace his intellectual disillusionment with conventional Christianity. The second division will then explain McLarenâs abductive reasoning processes (chapter 5), which he uses to expound upon the implications of the incarnation (chapter 6). Finally, the third division will explore the consequences of his logic: chapter 7 clarifies his deconstruction of conventional paradigms while chapter 8 systematizes his philosophy of religion.
In more detail, chapter 2 (âMcLaren the Manâ) will reveal how McLarenâs experiences with Christian fundamentalism encouraged him to pursue a new spiritual paradigm. Likewise, chapter 3 (âMcLaren the Activistâ) will contend that his philosophy of religion is intricately tied to his observations of the Religious Right and dogmatic neoconservatism, which he believes turned Christianity into a tribalistic culture-religion. Chapter 4 (âMcLaren the Iconoclastâ) will address his intellectual denial of Enlightenment-based paradigms that have caused both liberal and conservative Christians to become intransigent devotees to a bygone era. From these different socio-historical developments, McLaren subsequently established an idiosyncratic line of reasoning with which to approach Christian faith. Chapter 5 (âMcLaren and Abductionâ) will argue that he employs logical inference-building to emphasize the pragmatic and aesthetic aspects of religiosity. Significantly, however, McLaren often masks his abductive reasoning through deliberate provocations and satirical writings. Chapter 6 (âMcLaren and Christologyâ) will then expose how he applies his abductive logic to the incarnation of Christ, suggesting that McLaren is distinctively attracted to Jesus as the paradoxical Divine Revealer. The result is a stress on divine mystery and the impression that Christianity is a faith-based, suprarational belief in Godâs loving solidarity with the universe.
Having concluded that conventional paradigms are ineffective at discipleship (chapters 2â4) and having, subsequently, inferred certain beliefs about the incarnation (chapters 5â6), McLaren formed a unique philosophy of religion that he believes can help alleviate many of the problems associated with Western spirituality. Chapter 7 (âMcLarenâs Deconstructive Rationaleâ) will trace his exploration into the legitimacy of institutional Christianity and the churchâs articulation of Jesusâ gospel message. He concludes that Neoplatonism and imperialism usurped Jesusâ Jewish manifesto about Godâs kingdom, which has since caused Christians to misinterpret the essence of Christâs message. Chapter 8 (âMcLarenâs Existential Intersubjectivityâ) will demonstrate how McLaren seeks to overcome this foreign Greco-Roman framework, surmising that Christâs incarnation demands an existentially intersubjective relationship with (and obedience to) Jesusâ kingdom ethics. Before discussing the significance of McLarenâs religio-philosophy, however, a prefatory word is needed about referencing his many publications in this book.
1.1 Introductory Notes
Due to the large number ...