1. Lutherâs âSermon on Preparing to Dieâ in Its Time
The Reformationâs deep roots in late medieval religiosity and, at the same time, the serious break with traditional piety are both exemplified in the pastoral instructions for a Christian death. The first Reformation writing on the subject of the well-prepared death is especially telling on this point, also deserving of attention because it was one of the most widely spread and influential writings about death from the period. This was Martin Lutherâs âSermon on Preparing to Die,â which was probably written in the first half of October 1519 and published before the end of that month. Only two short 1529 tracts on dying by the Augsburg theologians Caspar Huberinus and Urbanus Rhegius (often printed together) enjoyed a similar, if not greater, circulation.
Lutherâs sermon belongs to a whole chain of sermons that he wrote in early modern High German in 1519 and 1520. By putting these works in the genre of âsermon,â Luther emphasized that they were not learned tracts that rationally discussed problems and provided detailed authoritative references; instead, they were simple documents in everyday language that were close to the pastoral situations of the pulpit, the confessional, and the deathbed. They were intended to communicate the essential elements of his theology in a basic, elementary, and catechetical way to a theologically untrained public. In this, Luther was continuing the popularizing impulse of the late medieval theology of piety, which sought to help Christians live out and deepen their spirituality, overlooking those complicated questions and disputes that were typical of the academic and systematic theologies of the âschools.â
2. The Ars Moriendi Literature between Suso and Luther
Catechetical efforts to simplify theology into the language of the people appeared in the many themes of praxis pietatis (the practice of piety), above all in the literature concerning ars moriendi (the art of dying). Although this was really an innovation of the fifteenth century, we must not forget that the mystic Henry Suso (Heinrich Seuse) wrote the first ars moriendi tract in German lands â and in the German language â sometime between 1328 and 1330. This was not a separate book but was instead chapter 21 of his Little Book of Eternal Wisdom, entitled âHow One Should Learn to Die and How an Unprepared Death Happens.â No other German text of the Middle Ages had as wide a circulation as the handwritten form of this work.
By synthesizing mystical inwardness and practical everyday piety, Suso gained a prominent and quintessential place in how theology was applied to spiritual instruction, edification, admonition, and consolation. The removal of chapter 21 of Susoâs book and its transmission either as a separate manuscript or publication show how the teaching about dying grew apart from its wider original context and became an independent theme. But the real beginning of ars moriendi as its own genre came with Jean Gerson, whose small tract De arte moriendi (written around 1400-1401) created the definitive prototype for the next century. The work was originally written in French as MĂ©dicine de lâĂąme or La science de bien mourir, but was soon thereafter translated into Latin, and after that into other vernacular languages. Above all, the tract set the mold through its concentration on the deathbed scene, its pragmatic brevity and clear structure, its simple way of speaking, its elementary pastoral and catechetical theology, and â last but not least â its successful use of the vernacular. These traits also mark Lutherâs sermon.
For the period between Gerson and Luther, we should especially mention those writings about death that were seen as important and typical representatives of ars moriendi within German-speaking lands. The widely circulated Speculum artis bene moriendi was written in Latin by an unknown author in the second quarter of the fifteenth century; it then appeared in several German translations, as well as in other languages. Somewhat later (probably around 1450) was published the Illustrated Ars Moriendi (hereafter, the Illustrated Ars) with its five Anfechtungen. Related to the Speculum and combining series of wood engravings with its texts, it was available in Latin and in vernaculars and beloved everywhere. Other works included âDie KĂŒnst von dem heilsamen sterben,â written by the court priest in Vienna, Thomas Peuntner (d. 1434), and a booklet by the preacher in the cathedral at Strasbourg, Johannes Geiler von Kayserberg, entitled âWie man sich halten sol by eym sterbenden menschenâ (1482), along with Kayserbergâs brief instruction âEin ABC. Wie man sich schicken sol zĂŒ einem kostlichen seligen todâ (1497). Finally, we should mention the writings of two Augustinian monks from Lutherâs immediate vicinity: the booklet âDie himlische funtgrubâ by the professor of theology in Erfurt, Johannes von Paltz, with its third sermon, âVon der wollgebrauchung des todesâ (which appeared in twenty-one editions between 1490 to 1521), and the booklet âVon der nachfolgung des willigen sterbens Christiâ (1515) by Johannes von Staupitz, Lutherâs superior in the order and his predecessor in the chair at Wittenberg.
3. Addressing the Reading Public: The Great Importance of the Lay Element
Asking about the audience for the late medieval ars moriendi literature reveals insightful information about how Lutherâs sermon came to work. Markus Schart (d. 1529), one of the court counselors of Elector Frederick the Wise, had asked Luther in the spring of 1519 for instruction on how to prepare for dying. Because he was overworked, Luther initially declined to write this. He first recommended that Schart read the booklet on dying by his fatherly friend Staupitz before he himself took up the pen. Here is the typically strong connection between ars moriendi literature and the pastoral care of the laity. Texts in Latin were primarily meant to be practical handbooks for pastoral care. Works in the vernacular, however, were directed not only to priests or members of a monastic order with less linguistic proficiency but even more to the bourgeois and noble laypeople who could read or who were at least interested in increasing their piety. These were the ones who pressed for written and illustrated works of pastoral care and catechesis for dying. They desired not only better instruction from the clergy but also the pious self-help that they could receive through their own reading, recitation, and visual contemplation. In this way, in the immense circulation of literature about dying from the time of Gerson until the Reformation, two innovative tendencies met and reinforced one another. On the one hand, there was the popular impetus of a practical reforming theology, which sought to reach into the daily lives of as many people as possible. On the other hand, there was the need of more discriminating educated and religious citizens, their wives, nobility, nuns, and other readers who did not have formal theological training.
It is therefore telling that Staupitz dedicated his comforting work about dying to a secular noblewoman, Countess Agnes von Mansfeld: âTo the blessed instruction of Your Grace and anyone else who may well come to it.â Johannes von Paltz also wrote and published his very successful âHeavenly Treasuryâ at the request of Elector Frederick the Wise (to whom he dedicated the work) and Frederickâs brother Duke John. This connection to the laity was characteristic of the ars moriendi literature as a whole, ever since its very beginning in France around 1270 and in Germany with Susoâs instructions for dying, written in the vernacular. It is therefore misleading to assert that the ars moriendi was originally intended for instructing priests in their care of the dying and that only later â when there were not enough priests during outbreaks of the plague â laypeople were also instructed as to how they âcould effectively accompany their neighbors in the last affliction.â In the period that followed, Gerson led the way by writing his instructions about dying for a wide readership of less educated people who needed it. He wrote as much for priests (sacerdotes) and ministers (curati) who were engaged in pastoral care as for laypeople (personae saeculares) and members of religious orders (personae religiosae). He could also hope âto teach the ordinary people (simplices) who never or rarely heard a sermon, or if they did, then only a bad one.â
4. The Goal of Ars Moriendi Literature: To Visualize Death and Prepare to Die
Right in the introduction of the Latin version of his work, Gerson formulated the broad and popular goal of his tract: âThough the following writing hopes to serve as a k...