Abstract
The recognition of what is geoheritage is based on the perception that some geodiversity elements have something that it is unusually important, which means that they have an extra value. Due to this high value, these elements must be protected, particularly when the risk of degradation caused by natural or anthropic factors is critical. This chapter details methods for the identification and inventorying of geoheritage. In addition, in order to prioritise subsequent management actions, the numerical assessment of the geoheritage value and risk of degradation are proposed, based on a set of criteria that intends to decrease the subjectivity inherent to any evaluation procedure.
Keywords
Geoheritage; geoconservation; geodiversity; geosite; inventory; assessment
The conservation of geological sites using a systematic and scientific background seems to have started in the United Kingdom in 1977, after the establishment of the Geological Conservation Review by the Nature Conservancy (Allen et al., 1987; Wimbledon, 1988). However, isolated efforts to protect geological localities were already happening in different countries from the 17th century (for a compilation of examples, see Gray, 2013; Larwood, 2016). A detailed description of more recent protection initiatives in most of the European countries was presented by Wimbledon and Smith-Meyer (2012). A similar analysis for Latin America countries was recently done by Palacio Prieto et al. (2016).
The protection of geological occurrences has always faced a big challenge: with so many rocks occurring all over the Earth’s surface, which ones should be managed in order to be conserved for the benefit of present and future generations? How should outcrops be selected? Which criteria should be used in order to ensure that the chosen localities are really the ones that must be protected?
This chapter aims to give clear answers to these questions. It presents a general perspective about geoheritage, mainly focusing on concepts, terminology, and methods for its inventorying and assessment. It should be stated from the beginning that geoheritage, or geological heritage in its extended form, is materialised by exceptional elements of geodiversity, namely minerals, fossils, rocks, landforms and their landscapes, soils, and active geological and geomorphological processes. Thus, in this chapter, the word ‘geology’ and its derivatives include all Earth sciences domains (mineralogy, petrology, geomorphology, palaeontology, etc.).
This chapter is organised into three sections, each one addressing a particular issue that is especially relevant to an increasing number of newcomers that are becoming interested in geoheritage:
1. What makes an element of geodiversity exceptional?
2. How should the high value of geodiversity elements be identified and characterised?
3. How and why should geoheritage be assessed?
4.1 What Makes an Element of Geodiversity Exceptional?
When something is considered exceptional, typically what is really being appreciated is its high value. Geodiversity elements may have different types of values, starting from those more concrete like the economic, functional, scientific and educational, to the more intangible ones, such as the intrinsic or existence, cultural, and the aesthetic values (Gray, 2013). With the exclusion of the intrinsic or existence value, all other types of value are strongly associated with an anthropogenic vision of nature, particularly in what concerns the use we make of nature. This is what Gray (2013) and Gray et al. (2013) refer to as ‘geosystem services’, i.e., the benefits that society gains from geodiversity elements, including regulating, supporting, provisioning, cultural and knowledge services.
Hence, for a geodiversity element to be considered exceptional, a high value must be assigned to it (Table 4.1). When a geodiversity element is considered important for several types of values, it means that its overall exceptionality is higher. For instance, all types of values can be assigned to the typical landforms of the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park in Central Australia, apart from just the cultural one referred to in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1
Examples of Locations Where Geodiversity Elements Have an Exceptional Value. Ex Situ Exemplars of Minerals, Fossils, and Rocks May Also Have All Types of Values, Except the Functional One
Value | Site/Location | Justification |
Economic | Escondida Mine (Chile) | Chile is the top copper-producing country in the world. In 2015 this mine alone produced 1148 million metric tons comprising mostly copper concentrate, which generates important revenues for this country |
Functional | Göreme National Park (Turkey) | The volcanic rocks of Cappadocia sculpted by erosion were used as dwellings, troglodyte villages and underground towns, which constitute the remains of a traditional human habitat dating back to the 4th century |
Scientific | Basque Coast UNESCO Global Geopark (Spain) | The definition of two Global Boundary Stratotype Sections and Points (GSSPs, lower boundaries of the Selandian Stage and of the Thanetian Stage, both belonging to the Paleocene Series) turns the coastal cliffs of Zumaia into a place with global importance for geosciences |
Educational | Terras de Cavaleiros UNESCO Global Geopark (Portugal) | The occurrence of a complete ophiolite sequence resulting from the obduction of Palaeothetys oceanic lithosphere over the Allochthonous Basal Complex attracts students from universities of different countries |
Intrinsic | Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russia) | Independently of human appreciation, this is one of the areas of higher density and diversity of active volcanoes on Earth |
Cultural | Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia) | The inselbergs of this park form an integral part of the traditional belief system of one of the oldest human societies in the world and it is considered a sacred place for the Anangu Aboriginal people |
Aesthetic | Iguaçu National Park (Argentina/Brazil) | One of the world’s largest and most impressive waterfalls extending over some 2700 m, attracting about 1.5 million visitors each year to enjoy the natural beauty of the site |
It is generally assumed by society that the main benefit obtained from geodiversity elements is limited to quarrying and mining of geological resources. This is the traditional understanding of what is the goal of geology, always associated with the exploitation of gold, coal, oil, etc. It is unquestionable that our complete dependence on geological resources to maintain the growing consumption of all sorts of products justifies the economic value of rocks and minerals.
However, many geoscientists around the world are trying to demonstrate that there is another way for geodiversity elements to be exploited by society, without the need to open a quarry, a mine or a borehole. In fact, based on their values, geodiversity elements may be used in a nonextractable sustainable way by different users/beneficiaries (Table 4.2). What kind of activities can be supported?
Table 4.2
Examples of Uses of Geodiversity Elements, Besides the Traditional Exploitation of Geological Resources. Each Type of Use Carried Out by Direct Users/Beneficiaries Is Based on Geodiversity Values
Uses of Geodiversity Elements | Users/Beneficiaries | Values |
Scientific | • Geoscientists • Social scientists (archaeologists, ethnographers…) | Scientific |
Cultural |
Educational(formal and informal) | • Students and teachers of different domains are direct users of formal educational activities. • Informal educational actions are addressed to the general public. In both cases, tourism companies, guides, restaurant and hotel industries, handicraft companies, local cooperatives, rental bus and rent-a-car companies may obtain economic benefits. | Educational (geosciences, social and cultural sciences, etc.) |
Cultural |
Economic (indirectly) |
Geotourism and recreation | • Nature tourism companies, guides, restaurant and hotel industries, handicraft companies, local cooperatives, rental bus and rent-a-car companies, etc. | Economic |
Aesthetic |
Cultural |
The scientific and educational use is not restricted to geosciences as it may be also applied to other disciplines.
Firstly, a scientific use carried out by geoscientists to produce meaningful scientific knowledge of how the geosphere works and interacts with other Earth systems (biosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere). This knowledge ensures the continuous advancement of geosciences with clear benefits for a growing human population that wishes to live safely and healthily. It is considered that a site has scientific value when the research done directly at that location or using samples collected from it has produced significant scientific understanding to allow the advancement of geosciences nationally and internationally (Brilha, 2016). In addition, sites that were relevant for the history of geosciences at the national and international levels may also be considered to have scientific value.
Secondly, an educational use can be applied by geoscience teachers in order to give students a solid knowledge about how planet Earth changes through time. This type of use is also related to the training of new generations of geoscientists.
Finally, certain geodiversity elements may justify a distinct form of economic use based on geotourism and leisure, ...