It was in these circumstances⊠in which he analyzed Don Quixoteâs dilemma of whether to follow the path of arms (praxis, action) or the path of letters (poiesis, creation, production), I understood for the first time the power of the word âpoiesisâ and invented the word that we needed: autopoiesis. This was a word without a history, a word that could directly mean what takes place in the dynamics of the autonomy proper to living systems.
Humberto Maturana (1928â) and Francisco Varela (1946â2001)
1.1 Introduction
The study of the evolution of biological molecules itself is nothing other than the evaluation of quasicrystals or aperiodic crystals (Maciå, 2005). This aperiodic order (orderly but without symmetry) has been the key to diversity and evolution since the appearance of the first molecules that had the capacity to self-replicate and with the ability to obtain memory patterns for future living systems (Jacobs & Frenkel, 2016; Zenil, 2013). Thus, prebiotic chemistry, like all forms, has physical laws that determine it, such as the state of the matter (Cleaves, 2018; Spitzer, Pielak, & Poolman, 2015), but the set of these laws that allow the origin of life from the interaction of molecules requires the nonlinearity of the dynamic process as well as the chaos that chance induces (Detrain & Deneubourg, 2006; Longo, Montévil, & Kauffman, 2012; Strogatz, 2018). That is why starting from molecular evolution as a primordial that is nourished by the interaction and communication between biological systems and their environment is probably the gateway to a set of foundations that will regulate a future series of biotechnological applications (Barge et al., 2017; Wagner & Rosen, 2014). In this way, the game of biological macromolecules is established through interaction and communication that ultimately achieves the storage of useful information (Massey & Mishra, 2018).
This information on complex biological systems will determine the appearance of replicators that will initiate adaptive mutation processes when they come into contact with the environment and its changes (Ma'ayan, 2017; Melkikh, 2014). This is how molecular evolution will modulate phenotypic changes in different species as a means to achieve this adaptation (Chevin & Beckerman, 2012; Harms & Thornton, 2013). These challenges are also used as a means of molecular innovation that increases chemical diversity and resilience capacity to assume the external pressure that will allow evolutionary success (López-Maury, Marguerat, & BÀhler, 2008). Finally, the macromolecules were diversified into the correspondence between the information represented by the genome and the functionality represented by the genotype both in their constant exchange of the environment (Sharov, 2014). Additionally, the thermodynamic flow that establishes the self-sustainability of the molecular evolution process must be taken into account to elucidate fluxomics in the production of metabolites, both primary and secondary (Kleidon, Malhi, & Cox, 2010). This is how the methods of evolutionary engineering appear as a consilient platform to develop chemical diversity of the capacity to use the adaptive potential for the species (Arnold, 2015; Shepelin, Hansen, Lennen, Luo, & HerrgÄrd, 2018); all this comes from the study of social interactions between living organisms, which evolved from the exercise in communication as a means of survival (Flemming et al., 2016). The objective of this chapter will be to analyze the physical, chemical, and biological systems that make up the molecular interaction and that constitute a factor of evolution whose foundations will be applied in evolutionary engineering models.
1.2 Aperiodic crystals and biological molecules
The organization of complex biological systems is bound to the laws of physics, in particular to quantum mechanics, which establishes the capacity for innovation and evolution of species in thermodynamic flows (Katsnelson, Wolf, & Koonin, 2018). In this way, the primordial/prebiotic soup composed of aperiodic crystals (conformed molecules in a nonperiodic ordered structure) capable of self-replicating were fundamental for the appearance of the first symbiotic cell or protobiont that came into interaction (Fig. 1) (Longo, Montévil, Sonnenschein, & Soto, 2015). Also, the physical and chemical properties of these molecules predispose to their micro-scale organization what preprogrammed their use in different cellular functions in the guise of an evolutionary geometry that lost periodicity or symmetry when they are represented in a three-dimensional space like regular crystals (Fig. 2) (Jorgenson, Mohammed, Agrawal, & Schulman, 2017; Murr, 2015). Likewise, these structures capable of carrying information are the link between an abiotic world and the emergence of life (Varn & Crutchfield, 2016; Wills, 2016). Equally, it is very important to take into account the emergence of autocatalytic sets, in which the symbiotic protobiont emerges from a group of molecules that formed a cooperative network that self-replicated together (Walker, 2017). Additionally, the autocatalytic network will be established as it acquires a state of homeostatic organization that allows it to configure a complex biosystem (Eskov, Filatova, Eskov, & Gavrilenko, 2017); in other words, it becomes self-sustaining and by compartmentalizing, it acquires the characteristics of a protocell (Hordijk, Naylor, Krasnogor, & Fellermann, 2018). Consequently, in the present living cells, the fact of being a nonperiodic molecular structure allows the interaction and the union of lengths,...