Abstract
Various nanoencapsulation techniques for food bioactive components and nutraceuticals have been studied in the last couple of years including nanoemulsions; nanostructured lipid carriers; nanosuspensions; solidโlipid nanoparticles (NPs); nanosized liposomes and phytosomes; biopolymer NPs; and micelles made of proteins, polysaccharides, and their complexes or conjugates. These techniques yield nanoscale carriers (10โ1000 nm). In this chapter, we have classified nanoencapsulation technologies into five groups based on the main mechanism/ingredient, which is being used to make nanocapsules. They include lipid-based techniques, nature-inspired techniques, specialized-equipment techniques, biopolymer-based techniques, and disparate techniques. Most of the bioactive compounds, such as hydrophobic vitamins, fatty acids, flavonoids, aromas, preservatives, etc., have hydrophobic natures which can be encapsulated by lipid-based nanocapsules. The idea of bioactives encapsulation using natural nanocarriers such as caseins, cyclodextrins, and amylose nanostructures results from taking into account the nature-made functionalities of these NPs. For the nanoencapsulation of food ingredients using different technologies, it is necessary to apply some general equipment including homogenizers, mills, mixing devices, etc., but there are some nanoencapsulation techniques which are feasible to implement only by specialized developed equipment such as electrospinning, electrospraying, nanospray dryer, and microfluidics devices. Utilization of individual biopolymer NPs and also complexes of biopolymer NPs along with nanogels and nanotubes made with biopolymers are another group of nanocarriers have been covered in this chapter. Finally, some miscellaneous techniques such as nanocrystals and dentrimeters have been described briefly.
Keywords
Nanocarriers; nanoencapsulation; techniques; food ingredients; classification
1.1 Introduction
Nanocapsules are defined in the literature as mostly an oily or hydrophilic cavity surrounded by a thin wall material (Jafari, Fathi, & Mandala, 2015). A broad variety of wall materials, such as biopolymers (proteins, carbohydrates), lipids, chemical polymers, surfactants, etc., can be used for the preparation of nanocapsules (Fathi, Martรญn, & McClements, 2014; Fathi, Mozafari, & Mohebbi, 2012). Nanocapsules are promising applications, since they are ideal for the encapsulation of many different bioactive ingredients such as antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, phenolic compounds, natural pigments, peptides, essential fatty acids, minerals, etc. (Borel & Sabliov, 2014; Ezhilarasi, Karthik, Chhanwal, & Anandharamakrishnan, 2013).
The implementation of nanotechnology that basically focuses on the medical science and diagnostic field is well known as nanomedicine. The term has been defined as โmonitoring, repair, construction, and control of human biological systems at the molecular level using engineered nanodevices and nanostructuresโ (Kumari, Singla, Guliani, & Yadav, 2014; Nitta & Numata, 2013). Some applications of nanotechnology in medicine are promising and many advantages have been offered in various medical areas such as targeted drug-delivery system and gene-targeted therapy. As many other medical areas, drug-delivery system experiences substantial growth concomitant with the advancement of nanotechnology over the past few years. Similarly, nutraceutical delivery system is an interdisciplinary field of studies applying knowledge from vast array of disciplines including biology, chemistry, pharmaceutical, and food sciences in combined fields of engineering and technology (Livney, 2015; McClements, 2015). In fact, it is one of the current nanotechnology advances employing nanosized particles for various manipulations either for technological or therapeutic purposes based on the nanotechnology concept.
Supposedly, an ideal nutraceutical-delivery system should transport bioactive molecules at particular sites without releasing its cargo at the previous points. Lately, many extensive efforts have been devoted to search for an appropriate technique to overcome some of the problems via research and development programs globally. It is then a practical role of delivery carrier being introduced in the process and the exploration for remarkable delivery vehicles has been interesting yet challenging area of research over the past decades. In this regard, the demanding exploration of delivery agents remains ongoing covering many aspects of research including on types of materials, physical and chemical properties as well as surface characterization of delivery carriers. In fact, sorts of materials have been profoundly studied since the past few years to efficiently construct an effective carrier such as inorganic nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes, gold, silver, and polymer-based nanoparticles (NPs) (Neves, Hashemi, & Prentice, 2015; Paredes, Asencio, Manuel, Allemandi, & Palma, 2016). Therefore, there is a broad range of nanosized encapsulation systems, most of them are still in the academic labs, only a very few made it to the market. A nanosized delivery system is scientifically defined in the food and pharmaceutical area as particles with a size of a few nanometers to just below 1000 nm (=1 ยตm). It should not be mixed up with the legal definition of NPs/nanomaterial for labeling consumer products, e.g., labeling of cosmetic ingredients in the European Union with โnanoโ are necessary when more than 50% (by number distribution) of the particles have sizes below 100 nm (Quintanilla-Carvajal, Camacho-Dรญaz et al., 2010; Yada, Buck et al., 2014).
1.2 Nanoencapsulation Techniques
Various nanoencapsulation techniques for food bioactive components and nutraceuticals have been studied in the last couple of years including nanoemulsions; nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs); nanosuspensions, solidโlipid nanoparticles (SLNs); nanosized liposomes; biopolymer NPs; and micelles made of proteins, polysaccharides, and their complexes or conjugates. These techniques yield nanoscale carriers (10โ1000 nm).
From a classical viewpoint, nanoencapsulation technologies can be divided into two main approaches: โtop-downโ and โbottom-up.โ Regarding the โtop-downโ method, particle size is decreased during the encapsulation process, e.g., by utilizing various mechanical forces; on the contrary, in the โbottom-upโ process, particle size is increased by methods, such as self-assembly. Furthermore, in some cases, a combination of both approaches has been used. This classification is not applicable nowadays, and it is better to categorize nanoencapsulation techniques in more groups based on some other indices.
In this book, we have classified nanoencapsulation technologies into five groups based on the main mechanism/ingredient, which is being used to make nanocapsules. They include lipid-based techniques, nature-inspired techniques, specialized-equipment techniques, biopolymer-based techniques, and disparate techniques as shown in Table 1.1. Also, different morphologies and structures of final nanocarriers has been reviewed in Table 1.2.
Table 1.1
An Overview of Nanoencapsulation Techniques for the Food Industry
| No. | Main Groups | Techniques | Different Strategies |
| 1 | Lipid-based techniques | Nano/Microemulsions | Single emulsions: oil in water (O/W); water in oil (W/O) |
| 2 | Double emulsions: W/O/W; O/W/O |
| 3 | Structural emulsions: single interface layer; double interface layer |
| 4 | Nanostructured phospholipid carriers | Liposomes: monolayer; multilayer |
| 5 | Phytosomes: monolayer; multilayer |
| 6 | Structural liposomes/phytosomes: with coatings |
| 7 | Nanolipid carriers | Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) |
| 8 | Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) |
| 9 | Smart lipid carriers |
| 10 | Nature-inspired techniques | Caseins | Alpha, beta, gamma-caseins |
| 11 | Cyclodextrins | Alpha, beta, gamma-cyclodextrins |
| 12 | Amylose | Single helix; double helix |
| 13 | Special equipment-based techniques | Electrospinning | Single injection nozzle; double injection |
| 14 | Electrospraying | |
| 15 | Nanospray dryer | |
| 16 | Microfluidics/Nanofluidics | |
| 17 | Biopolymer-based techniques | Single biopolymer nanocarriers | Protein nanoparticles made by desolvation |
| 18 | Polysaccharide nanoparticles made by precipitation |
| 19 | Complexd biopolymer nanocarriers | Protein + protein |
| 20 | Polysaccharide + polysaccharide |
| 21 | Protein + polysaccharide |
| 22 | Nanogels | Hydrogels |
| 23 | Organogels/Oleogels |
| 24 | Mixed gels |
| 25 | Nanotubes | Protein nanotubes made with alpha-lactalbumin |
| 26 | Other techniques | Nanocrystals | Bioactives within crystals |
| 27 | Bioactive crystals within other nanocarriers |
| 28 | Nanostructured surfactants | Niosomes |
| 29 | Dendrimeters |
Table 1.2
Different Morphologies and Structures for Nanocarriers of Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals
| No. | Main Groups | Structures | Different Forms |
| 1 | Spherical nanocarriers | Nanocapsules | Liquid form: Nanocarriers made with nanoemulsions; nanostructured lipid carriers; nanoliposomes/phytosomes; cyclodextrins; electrospraying; microfluidics; biopolymer nanoparticles; niosomes; dendrimeters |
| 2 | Dried form (containing a void): nanocarriers made with nanospray dryer, nanocrystals |
| 3 | Nanospheres | Nanogels; casein nanocarriers |
| 4 | Tubular nanocarriers | Filled fibers | Electrospun fibers |
| 5 | Hollow tubes | Protein nanotunes |
| 6 | Helix forms | Amylose nanocarriers |
In the following sections, we will discuss briefly different techniques used for the nanoencapsulation of food bioactive ingredients. Much more details are provided in our previous book titled โNanoencapsulation technologies for the food and nutraceutical industries,โ in which each chapter has been devoted to one nanoencapsulation technique (Jafari, 2017). It should be mentioned that selection of a nanoencapsulation technology depends on several parameters, such as physicochemical features, required particle size, release type, delivery method, process cost, etc.
1.3 Lipid-Based Nanoencapsulation Techniques
Lipid-based nanoencapsulation systems are mostly used in the pharmaceutical and food industries and research programs. Despite the major advantages of biopolymer nanocapsules, they cannot be mass produced due to the demand for complicated chemical and thermal processes that should be monitored permanently. On the contrary, water-insoluble nanocarriers have the possibility to be scaled up plus the potential of more encapsulation efficiency and low toxicity (Fathi, Mozafari et al., 2012; Tamjidi, Shahedi, Varshosaz, & Nasirpour, 2013).
Most of the bioactive compounds, such as hydrophobic vitamins, fatty acids, flavonoids, arom...