Truly successful scientists build on the foundations of discovery laid down by those who have gone before them, likewise in managing a career in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Though the process varies widely across cultures, and from individual to individual, most mentors and career specialists agree that being deliberate about managing one's own career is an important factor in achieving success.
At its simplest, career management involves four steps: (1) develop self-awareness, (2) identify opportunities, (3) decide and develop a plan, and (4) implement plan and review periodically. This chapter describes these steps as they relate to Science Careers's web-based tool, myIDP (myidp.sciencecareers.org). âMy Independent Development Profileâ is an authoritative, open access tool developed for PhDs and postdoctoral fellows in science that presents a stepwise approach to planning and managing one's own career that is equally relevant to early-career STEM professionals.
Keywords
STEM career planning; development; management; individual values; goals; choices; myIDP
This job is a great scientific adventure. But itâs also a great human adventure.
Joanne Simpson (1923â2010), the first woman to earn a doctorate in Meteorology
Managing a career in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is an artânot a scienceâthat requires your personal attention and active engagement. The knowledge and skills you need are not often taught as part of your formal training in STEM, but they can be learned and applied at any time in your life. There is an entire literature on the topic; many excellent books, websites, and online tools to assist you; and STEM mentors and career development practitioners who are willing to guide you. It has been my pleasure, as a career information specialist, career educator, and university instructor to support women (and men) graduate students and early career STEM professionals as they make the transition from formal training to the world of work.
The Myth of âCareer Planningâ
Most of the 350+ women in STEM interviewed for the first edition of this book, and the many hundreds more with whom Iâve spoken in the decade since, reported that they did not âplanâ their careers, at least not in the traditional sense of mapping out every step that they would take, from the time of their formal training, to their retirement, and beyond. Rather, at each stage of their professional and personal lives, they looked ahead to the next transition point and prepared themselves for that. From the options available to them at the time, they made the best choices possible, in light of their current circumstances, the expectations of their discipline, preferred work environment and culture, and an understanding of their own values, needs, interests, strengths, and skills.
This approach reflects the contemporary view of career development professionals in the West that career management is âthe lifelong process of managing learning, work, leisure, and transitions in order to move toward a personally determined and evolving preferred futureâ (National Steering Committee for Career Development Guidelines and Standards, 2004, p. 2). Clearly, in this paradigm, the term âcareerâ differs from a job or profession. More encompassing than either, it is a âlifestyle concept that involves the sequence of work, learning and leisure activities in which one engages throughout a lifetime [and in which one invests energy to create something that is bigger than oneself]. Careers are unique to each person and are dynamic; unfolding throughout lifeâ (National Steering Committee for Career Development Guidelines and Standards, 2004, p. 2)1.
The stories presented in this chapter and throughout the book illustrate just how individual each personâs life is: how different the beginnings, the opportunities, the choices, the balance between professional and personal roles. We begin by examining the concept of âsuccessâ and identifying some common characteristics and attitudes of successful women in STEM. The critical impact of our context on the pressures that we experience, the constraints we must deal with, and the opportunities available to us are discussed, as is the need for each of us to seek outâand create if necessaryâopportunities for ourselves. This chapter closes with a discussion of strategies for managing our own careers.
What Is Success?
We all need to feel that we are contributing to society in some positive way, that our efforts are valued and appreciated, that our work (whether paid or unpaid) matters. Though the expression of this need varies with the individual and her circumstances, it underlies all striving for success. But what, exactly, is success? The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as â(1) the accomplishment of an aim or purpose⌠(2) The good or bad outcome of an undertakingâ (Stevenson, 2014). Clearly, it is important to distinguish between the criteria that we use to judge success2 and those used by society,3 for they may differ. How we can deal with a mismatch is discussed extensively throughout this book.4 Of particular importance is a reaffirmation of our values, priorities, and goals5 and the support of our network,6 as the following story illustrates.
During the final year of her PhD program in a top-ranked university in Canada, an engineering student began receiving tremendous pressure from her academic colleagues to apply for tenure-track positions in academe. In a discipline in which female faculty are underrepresented, they saw her as a âperfect fitâ: she is an excellent scientist, loves teaching, AND is female.
Though interested in an academic career, she knew that she wanted to gain industry experience first, so that when she entered academe, she could anchor her skills in real-life problems and be able to bring to her students perspective and experience from both the theoretical and applied worlds of engineering. At the same time (and on a more personal level), she was involved in a serious relationship with a partner who lived in a larger community several hours away with whom she was planning marriage and a family. To her mind, the best choice was to seek a position in industry, in the community where her future husband lived.
But she respected the experience and advice of her colleagues and superiors, was understandably flattered by their unreserved confidence in her, andâto a certain extentâenamored of the idea of becoming a faculty memberâand an important role modelâat such a young age. Still, she applied for several jobs and was offered positions even before finishing her PhD. This put her in a very awkward position because the interviews confirmed that her best choice after graduation would be to work in industry. When she respectfully declined to apply for academic positions, her superiors were surprised, some expressed disappointment and even anger; a few declared that she was ruining her career. The feedback did not stop there. Some continually urged her to reconsider her decision, and when she did not, she felt pressured to justify her actions.
It was a difficult time for her, especially because she needed to focus all her energies and attention on completing her thesis and preparing for her defense. Under the strain, she began doubting not only her career decision, but even her abilities as a scientist. Fortunately, she had the support of trusted friends and family members to encourage her, and when she reexamined her own values and personal and professional goals, she was able to make the conscious choice to believe in her own reasoning and trust her decision.
Today she is happily balancing the demands of an active family life, and her stimulating position at a highly respected engineering consulting firm.
Successful Women Scientists: Shared Qualities, Common Themes
Working hard overcomes a whole lot of other obstacles. You can have unbelievable intelligence, you can have connections, you can have opportunities fall out of the sky. But in the end, hard work is the true, enduring characteristic of successful people.
Rear Admiral (Ret.) Marsha J. Evans, former President and CEO, American Red Cross
Though each career is distinct, successful women in STEM share many qualities, attitudes, and goals that can be instructive to aspiring professionals. All have discovered that achieving in STEMâindeed, as in all of lifeârequires vision, focus, dedication, determination, a commitment to lifelong learning, and a persistent striving for excellence. It involves courage and a willingness to make difficult choices and compromises.
Engineer Dr. Luciane Cunha was working in industry in Brazil until an opportunity to do doctorate work lured her to the United States. She had written a national exam after completing her undergraduate degree and was one of only two women to be hired by Petrogas, a major petroleum-engineering firm in her country. Something of a pioneering woman in her field, she excelled in her work and was promoted to a position on an offshore oil rig (an environment that had no facilities for women), and she continued to achieve.
By the time she was offered a position in graduate school, she was established in her work, was married, and had a family. But the opportunity to pursue her research interests and advance her career was too good to decline. She accepted the position, even though it meant leaving her husband and children at home.
After earning her PhD, she was offered a permanent job in an academic institution with a strong, international reputation in her field, and moved to Canadaâto a very different social structure and climate. This time, her children moved with her, while her husband remained in South America. Several years later, her husband secured an academic appointment at the same university and left Brazil to join the family.
For Luciane, the many hours of lost sleep, time she would like to have spent with her children, and missed opportunities for professional advancement in industry were necessary compromises. âProfessionally speaking, I could have achieved a CEO position, had I stayed with Petrogas,â she believes. âSometimes I had to say ânoâ to things like that because I was balancing professional and personal responsibilities.â But she does not regret her choices. âI am happy with my career, especially in my roles as educator and mentor to the women in my classes. I try to teach them that their choices are not âbadâ ones, that they certainly will be able to accommodate all the things in life.â
At times, achieving in a STEM field may mean disregarding well-meaning advice about what you cannot do and the way things have âalwaysâ been done. But most important, it involves remaining flexible.
Dr. June E. Osborn, Chair of Physician Leadership on National Drug Policy, in the United States,7 also took advantage of unexpected options and opportunities, and ended up combining science and public policy. She chose medicine because she loved science, enjoyed people, and was good at interacting with them, and, more practically, because she saw medicine as a field that offered a wealth and breadth of job possibilities. Rather than open her own medical practice after she finished her pediatric training, she completed postdoctoral work in virology and pursued a career in academe at the University of Wisconsin.
At the time, the institution had a nepotism rule that prevented her from holding a primary appointment in the same department as her husband (also an academic), so she accepted a faculty position in the Department of Microbiology. After 18 years of research and teachingâand raising three childrenâit turned out that she had the ideal credentials to apply herself to the study of AIDS when it emerged. âIt was a remarkably systematic coincidence. If someone had sat down two decades earlier and said âwe want to be ready to take on the worldâs greatest epidemic when it comes along,â they would have recommended the kind of educational preparation and research experience that I had. The saying âchance favors the prepared mindâ might apply to what happened to me.â
As one of the few women in her field in those early years, she served on more than her share of professional groups and federal advisory committees. She was involved in the heated vaccine controversies of the 1970s and chaired the committee that advised the National Institutes of Health on the emerging AIDS epidemic in the early 1980s...