1.2.1 Definition of auxetic materials
It is logical to think that Poisson’s ratio is positive, and for most of the materials in engineering,
lies in the range from 0.2 to 0.5
[1]. Actually, the negative value of Poisson’s ratio does not contradict the classical elasticity, although it sounds incredible. Bounds for the Poisson’s ratio have been sufficiently discussed in literature. As early as 1848, Saint-Venant
[2] suggested that the Poisson’s ratio may be negative in anisotropic materials and also may be greater than 0.5 for the first time in history. The limitation of the Poisson’s ratio (between −1 and 0.5) for isotropic materials was given by Fung
[3] in 1965 according to the mathematical theory of elasticity. Similar conclusion was also reported elsewhere
[4–
6]. Based on the first law of thermodynamics, classical elasticity posits a free energy
for isotropic body as a function of the strain tensor
[4]:
(1.2)
where the general summation rule on repeated indices was used in the text book by Landau and Lifshitz
[4], and the quantities
and
are called
Lamé coefficients (
is also called the shear modulus).
Since any deformation of bodies can be represented as the sum of a pure shear and a hydrostatic compression, an identical expression for the strain tensor can be given as
(1.3)
where δik is Kronecker delta and D = 2, 3 refers to the numbers of dimensions. What should be noted is that the values of subscripts i, k, n are x, y with D=2 while that are x, y, z with D=3. As mentioned by Landau and Lifshitz [4], the first term on the right is a pure shear, and the second term is a hydrostatic compression.
By using Eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) a general expression for the free energy of a deformed isotropic body in D dimension is given as follows [5]:
(1.4)
where
and the quadratic
Eq. (1.4) is positive definite if and only if the quantities
and
are positive, that is
,
.
The stress tensor can be obtained by calculate the derivatives
:
(1.5)
Intuitively, we can find from Eq. (1.5) that
(1.6)
Then, it is not difficult to give the converse formula that expresses strain tensor
in terms of stress tensor
:
(1.7)
For a 3D isotropic body, just considering a hydrostatic pressure of
along the
z axis, we have
,
,
, and all the component
and
with
are zero. The remaining components of
can be obtained according to
Eq. (1.7):
(1.8)
Similarly, in the case of the 2D isotropic body, considering a hydrostatic pressure of
along the
y axis, we can find
(1.9)
According to the definition of the Poisson’s ratio [see Eq. (1.1)], a general expression for the Poisson’s ratio of isotropic body in D dimensions can be given by using Eqs. (1.8) and (1.9):
(1.10)