A characteristic that is common to all complex engineering systems is the complexity and multidisciplinary coordination of the support system that enables the smooth operation of the engineering system.
1.2.1. Metro Trains Melbourne (MTM)
Metro Trains Melbourne (MTM) is a consortium of rail and construction businesses including Hong Kongās MTR Corporation, Australiaās John Holland Group and UGL Rail, a division of United Group Limited. MTM has a contract to operate and maintain the public transport rail service used by Melbourne commuters.
This franchise contract brings together international experience to deliver long-term service-supply agreements that cover rolling stock supply, maintenance and refurbishment, rail infrastructure maintenance and renewals, and the delivery of major capital works programme. MTM was selected as the new operator by the State Government of Victoria in June 2009 and replaced the previous operator, Connex Melbourne, on 30 November 2009.
MTM operates a fleet of approximately 323 trains on 830 km of track. There are 16 daily train lines and 1 special-events train line. The train fleet covers more than 30M km per year and services more than 200M customer journeys per year. MTM is also responsible for 211 train stations and employs a workforce of 3,500 rail professionals that includes train drivers, mechanical and electrical engineers, network operations specialists and customer-service representatives. As part of the agreed-upon service plan, the Victorian Government (owner of Melbourne train network) promised to increase the carrying capacity by approximately 20%.
MTMās operations and maintenance activities are governed by legislation, regulations and guidelines including:
⢠Transport Integration Act 2010
⢠Rail Management Act 1996
⢠Rail Safety Act 2006
⢠Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983
⢠Transport (Ticketing) Regulations 2006
⢠Transport (Conduct) Regulations 2005
⢠Victorian Fares and Ticketing Manual
A key part of the operator service contract is the achievement of high punctuality (Metro Trains, 2013). Metro had a good record for services run; the percentage exceeded the target of 98% from November 2009 through June 2010 (i.e. every one of the first eight months after the consortium took control of the network). However, on 27 July 2010, a major service disruption was recorded that affected 400,000 passengers. In addition, according to the overall performance measure, MTM incurred performance penalties of $4.8M from December 2009 to June 2010. Trains were mostly delayed due to electrical fault in the system and operator delays.
Analysis of the initial MTM operation and maintenance model shows the following deficiencies:
1. Customer satisfaction. The Public Transport Performance Report for the six months ending December 2012 indicated a customer satisfaction index score of 68%. Although MTM came close with a 67.3% score, this level was far from the 90% that the London Overground achieved in the preceding period.
2. Service punctuality. The same report lists the service punctuality at 92.4%, which exceeds the 89% specified target. However, the Hong Kong rail system carries over 4M people a day and manages to achieve 99.9% on-time arrivals.
3. Inefficient operations. Before 2011, train timetables had not been redesigned holistically since the City Loop was opened in the 1980s. Rather, additional services were generally added into the timetable incrementally, often by only changing the times of adjacent trains to accommodate new services. This approach resulted in the complex, irregular and inefficient stopping patterns and service headways that currently remain on some lines.
4. Maintenance. As a direct consequence of previous franchise that simply maintained the status quo of assets and operational expenses instead of planning and implementing an improvement regime, MTM has been left with a severely degraded asset. MTMās asset management plan (AMP) is reported to portray a high level of reactive maintenance compared to planned maintenance, which is to be expected given the state of the inherited infrastructure.
Influences on these deficiencies come from a myriad of sources. Internally, MTM has the desire to improve the reliability of the infrastructure to permit a higher level of reliability and therefore improved train service reliability. This strategy means that, in the short term at least, there can be expectations of higher-than-desired levels of impact on service delivery due to the high levels of maintenance and upgrades that are required in order to meet those long-term goals.
Other deficiencies in urban railways are often influenced by the environment in which the system is being operated. Like many Western countries, Australia has an excessive dependence on automobiles which has led to underutilised public-transport systems. This underutilisation has resulted in poor-performing services as the costs of maintaining the assets and infrastructure outstrip income for the organisation or government operating the transport solution. The flow-on effect is reduced spending on upgrades and new infrastructure and a lack of investment in the industry.
One thing that appears absent from consideration is how to make public transport look attractive to commuters who currently use private transport. Key to this goal is a reliable, consistent service that is safe, quick and affordable. The way to achieve these improvements is through collaboration throughout the supply chain in ways that ensure the interfaces between logistics and maintenance are efficient and effective and ensure that services are supplied on time and with sufficient capacity. In addition, rationalising the road network and placing public transport as a higher priority than vehicle access could encourage greater use of public transport and reduce road-maintenance costs.