Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems

George W. Koch, Jacques Roy

• Publisher: Academic Press
• Year: 1995
• Print ISBN:
  9780125052955
• eBook ISBN:
  9780080500706
• Topic: Biological Sciences
• Subtopic: Ecology
• Index: Biological Sciences

The importance of carbon dioxide extends from cellular to global levels of organization and potential ecological deterioration may be the result of increased CO2 in our atmosphere. Recently, the research emphasis shifted from studies of photosynthesis pathways and plant growth to ground-breaking studies of carbon dioxide balances in ecosystems, regions, and even the entire globe. Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems addresses these new areas of research. Economically important woody ecosystems are emphasized because they have substantial influence on global carbon dioxide balances. Herbaceous ecosystems (e.g., grasslands, prairies, wetlands) and crop ecosystems are also covered. The interactions among organisms, communities, and ecosystems are modeled, and the book closes with an important synthesis of this growing nexus of research. Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems is a compilation of detailed scientific studies that reveal how ecosystems generally, and particular plants specifically, respond to changed levels of carbon dioxide. - Contributions from an international team of experts - Empirical examination of the actual effects of carbon dioxide - Variety of terrestrial habitats investigated - Specific plants and whole ecosystems offered as studies

1

Tree Responses to Elevated CO₂ and Implications for Forests

Richard J. Norby, Stan D. Wullschleger and Carla A. Gunderson

I. Introduction

The responses of forest ecosystems to elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO₂ cannot be measured directly in experiments that approximate environmental conditions of the future. Even if large and expensive facilities are constructed for manipulation of the abiotic environment in a forest, the edaphic and biotic adjustments that will occur over decade time frames cannot be reproduced in an experimental system. Nevertheless, there is a compelling need to understand the responses of forests to elevated CO₂ because of the prominent role of forests in the global carbon cycle and the potential for CO₂ fertilization to alter the relationship between the carbon cycle and the climate system ( Solomon and Cramer, 1993).

Our ability to measure forest response is constrained by two prominent features of forests that do not similarly constrain research on other ecosystems. The first constraint is that the dominant organisms of forests—trees—are large and have a long life span, precluding simple pot experiments for assessing growth responses to elevated CO₂, as well as many of the important physiological responses. Such studies have been invaluable with crop plants and grasses, where the plant can be grown to its full size and life span. With trees we must instead rely on extrapolation from relevant physiological and morphological indicators of response, and multiyear studies must be conducted in the field so that conclusions are not confounded by the artifactual restrictions of root growth in pots ( Eamus and Jarvis, 1989).

The second important constraint is that the ecological complexity of forest ecosystems greatly increases the importance of considerations beyond single tree responses. Of course, assessment of the response of any ecosystem must encompass considerations of many biotic and abiotic influences besides the response of a single dominant plant species, but the larger spatial and temporal scales of forest ecosystems increase the importance of these considerations—and the difficulty in addressing them—manyfold. In systems of smaller stature, intact ecosystems can be enclosed in chambers and ecosystem-level responses to CO₂ measured directly ( Oechel et al., 1991; Drake, 1992; Owensby et al., 1993), but the scale of forests precludes similar studies. Instead, the CO₂ responses of critical components of the forest, including interactions and feedback between trees and multiple environmental resources, must be studied separately in a manner conducive to reassembly in an integrated analysis. Scale is an especially important consideration in a complex and diverse forest type such as the eastern North American deciduous forest, raising the issue of differential responses of competing tree species to changes in the atmospheric CO₂ concentration ( Bazzaz and Miao, 1993).

Although these problems limiting our ability to obtain data on tree responses that are relevant to ecosystem and global-scale questions seemed daunting, we began a series of experiments in 1981 designed to investigate the responses of trees, especially deciduous species, to elevated CO₂ (Norby et al., 1994). The overriding question was whether nutrient limitation, as commonly occurs in unmanaged forests, would preclude growth enhancement in response to CO₂ enrichment. The experiments focused on mechanisms of CO₂ X nutrient interactions, especially on belowground processes such as exudation, rhizosphere microbial activity, and symbiotic relationships that could alter nutrient availability. The results showed that below-ground processes are often especially stimulated by CO₂ enrichment and that nutrient deficiency does not necessarily preclude growth responses to elevated CO₂, at least during experiments lasting several months. The mechanisms sustaining growth response under nutrient-limited conditions can include increased nutrient availability in the plant–soil system, as well as decreased physiological demand for nutrients by the plant ( Norby et al., 1986, 1994). Although questions at a finer scale of resolution (e.g., biochemical mechanisms of response) naturally occurred during the course of these experiments, the most important new questions that developed concerned whether short-term responses could be sustained over several growing seasons under field conditions. These are key issues that control whether the growth chamber studies are at all useful in predicting forest responses. The questions that arose included the following: Does feedback between growth and photosynthesis limit the enhancement of photosynthesis over time? How does growth in elevated CO₂ alter the processes of nutrient and carbon storage and retranslocation? Do CO₂-induced changes in tissue chemistry influence decomposition and nutrient turnover?

Here we describe the field experiment that was designed to test and extend the concepts developed in the series of growth chamber experiments. We will discuss the results of the field experiment in relation to the larger issue of forest ecosystem response to elevated CO₂, and finally we will suggest how our new insights should logically lead to new experimental approaches.

II Experimental Approach

In order to begin to address these questions, it was necessary to grow trees in elevated CO₂ for more than one growing season under conditions more closely resembling the forest environment than is possible in a growth chamber experiment with potted plants. Hence, an open-top chamber experiment was initiated in 1989. There were three primary objectives of this field experiment:

1. To determine whether the short-term responses of tree seedlings to elevated CO₂ are sustained over several growing seasons under field conditions.

2. To compare the responses to elevated CO₂ of Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar or tulip tree, family Magnoliaceae) and Quercus alba L. (white oak, family Fagaceae). These species are important, cooccurring components of the deciduous forest of eastern North America that have many contrasting physiological, morphological, and ecological features. For example, yellow poplar grows faster than white oak, initiates new leaves throughout the growing season, is more nutrient demanding, and is less drought resistant, and its litter decomposes more rapidly.

3. To provide data and insights relevant for predicting forest ecosystem responses to elevated CO₂. Because of the experimental limitations discussed earlier, simulation models will be necessary to predict forest ecosystem responses. These modeling approaches will be much more useful and believable if they incorporate the best evidence about how forest processes, resource interactions, and biogeochemical feedback will be influenced by elevated CO₂.

Seeds of the two species were collected from single trees in Fall 1988, germinated, and planted in pots. The seedlings initially were raised in growth chambers containing CO₂ concentrations of 380, 500, or 650 μmol mol⁻¹. After a dormant period at 0–4°C, the seedlings were planted in soil within six open-top chambers in May 1989. The chambers were of standard design ( Rogers et al., 1983), 3 m in diameter and 2.4 m tall (later extended to 3.6 m tall). Ten seedlings of each species were planted in each chamber, and later the plots were thinned to five of each species. The faster growing yellow poplar plants were in the northern half of the chamber so as not to shade the white oak plants. Four chambers were provided with CO₂ continuously to maintain CO₂ concentrations of 150 and 300 μmol mol⁻¹ higher than ambient (two replicate chambers per treatment, designated + 150 and +300). In addition, there were two chambers with no added CO₂ (ambient CO₂ or +0). Carbon dioxide enrichment was not continued during the winter when the trees were leafless and dormant (mid-November to mid-April). No fertilization or supplemental irrigation was provided during the experiment. Nitrogen mineralization at this site is estimated to be about 100 kg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. Foliar N concentrations of the yellow poplar trees ( Table I) were lower than the range considered typical for the species ( Leaf, 1973), suggesting possible N limitation. A period of low rainfall in spring of the second year was reflected in lower stomatal conductance ( Gunderson et al., 1993), but otherwise rainfall was plentiful, there were no morphological manifestations of drought stress, and growth was vigorous.

Table I

Nitrogen Content and Distribution in Yellow Poplar Saplings after Three Growing Seasons in Ambient or Elevated CO₂ Concentrations ^a

^aData are the means (±SD) of five plants per chamber in two replicate chambers per CO₂ concentration. Nitrogen concentrations of fine (<2 mm) and small (2–7 mm) roots were determined on samples collected from soil cores; these data were converted to grams of N per plant as described in Fig. 2.

Measurements made during the course of the experiment included stem height and basal diameter, from which stem dry mass could be estimated, light-saturated photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance. Leaves were occasionally sampled for constituent analysis. At the end of each growing season, leaves were collected as they abscised. These senescent leaves were measured for determination of final leaf area of the plants and for litter ...

Table of contents

• Cover image
• Title page
• Table of Contents
• Physiological Ecology A Series of Monographs, Texts, and Treatises
• Copyright
• Contributors
• Preface
• Chapter 1: Tree Responses to Elevated CO2 and Implications for Forests
• Chapter 2: Effects of CO2 and N on Growth and N Dynamics in Ponderosa Pine: Results from the First Two Growing Seasons
• Chapter 3: Linking Above- and Belowground Responses to Rising CO2 in Northern Deciduous Forest Species
• Chapter 4: Effects of Tree Maturity on Some Responses to Elevated CO2 in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong. Carr)
• Chapter 5: Growth Strategy and Tree Response to Elevated CO2: A Comparison of Beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.)
• Chapter 6: Litter Quality and Decomposition Rates of Foliar Litter Produced under CO2 Enrichment
• Chapter 7: CO2-Mediated Changes in Tree Chemistry and Tree-Lepidoptera Interactions
• Chapter 8: The Jasper Ridge CO2 Experiment: Design and Motivation
• Chapter 9: Ecosystem-Level Responses of Tallgrass Prairie to Elevated CO2
• Chapter 10: Direct Effects of Elevated CO2 on Arctic Plant and Ecosystem Function
• Chapter 11: Response of Alpine Vegetation to Elevated CO2
• Chapter 12: Long-Term Elevated CO2 Exposure in a Chesapeake Bay Wetland: Ecosystem Gas Exchange, Primary Production, and Tissue Nitrogen
• Chapter 13: Free-Air CO2 Enrichment: Responses of Cotton and Wheat Crops
• Chapter 14: Response of Growth and CO2 Uptake of Spring Wheat and Faba Bean to CO2 Concentration under Semifield Conditions: Comparing Results of Field Experiments and Simulations
• Chapter 15: Assessment of Rice Responses to Global Climate Change: CO2 and Temperature
• Chapter 16: Interactions between CO2 and Nitrogen in Forests: Can We Extrapolate from the Seedling to the Stand Level?
• Chapter 17: Protection from Oxidative Stress in Trees as Affected by Elevated CO2 and Environmental Stress
• Chapter 18: Integrating Knowledge of Crop Responses to Elevated CO2 and Temperature with Mechanistic Simulation Models: Model Components and Research Needs
• Chapter 19: Progress, Limitations, and Challenges in Modeling the Effects of Elevated CO2 on Plants and Ecosystems
• Chapter 20: Stimulation of Global Photosynthetic Carbon Influx by an Increase in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration
• Chapter 21: Biota Growth Factor β: Stimulation of Terrestrial Ecosystem Net Primary Production by Elevated Atmospheric CO2
• Chapter 22: Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Elevated CO2: A Synthesis and Summary
• Index