1
Introduction: Baconâs Two Lives
FRANCIS BACON lived two separate but interconnected lives. One was the meditative, reserved life of a philosopher, scientific inquirer, and writer of genius, a thinker of soaring ambition and vast range whose project for the reconstruction of philosophy contained a new vision of science and its place in society. The other was the troubled, insecure life of a courtier, professional lawyer, politician, royal servant, adviser, and minister to two sovereigns, Elizabeth I and James I, who from early youth to old age never ceased his quest for high position and the favor of the great. It was the first of his two lives that brought Bacon the lasting fame for which he strove, and established his claim to the permanent interest of posterity. The second, however, absorbed a large part of his time and energy, pitting him against rivals in a continual competition for office and power, diverting him from pursuing some of his most cherished intellectual goals, and forcing him to leave his main philosophical enterprise fragmentary and unfinished. Moreover, although he was in many ways the most intelligent English statesman of his generation, better equipped than any other to advise a ruler, his political life was a failure. Despite all his efforts, he never attained the kind of influence in government he needed in order to give effect to his ideas and was always obliged to submit to the direction of lesser minds.
Bacon was very conscious of the split between his two lives and the disharmony they imposed on his existence. He sometimes applied to himself the sorrowful words of Psalm 19 in the Vulgate version, âMultum incola fuit anima meaâ (âMy soul was a strangerâ); and in a prayer he composed in 1621 after his condemnation for corruption in his office as lord chancellor, he confessed that he had made poor use of the gifts God had granted him, misspending his talents âin things for which I was least fit, so as I may truly say, my soul hath been a stranger in the course of my pilgrimage.â1
Despite such expressions of regret, Bacon was irresistibly attracted to politics and would never willingly retire into a private existence. The contrast between his two lives as philosopher and politician, and certain of his traits and actions as a public man, have made his complex personality an enigma to many. Noting the curious mixture of elements in his mental composition, Lytton Strachey felt compelled to put the question, âWho has ever explained Francis Bacon?â2 Another scholar has commented that âeven to the keenest minds Bacon is ultimately an impenetrable mystery.â3 Even Lord Macaulay, who with his customary self-confidence presumed in a famous essay on Bacon that he understood him thoroughly, was perplexed by the contradictions he perceived between Baconâs greatness as a thinker and his baseness as a man.4 Because politics was so important to Bacon, no account of his philosophy can be adequate that fails to consider certain aspects of his personal history and political career and the character they reveal. This is essential not only for the insight it provides into the human being and his experiences that are present in his writings, but no less for its relevance in helping us to understand some of his ideas. What follows is accordingly a brief and selective biographical sketch discussing chiefly those features of his life that may shed light on his thought.5
Bacon came by his aspiration to acquire power in the royal service as a natural inheritance from his father, Sir Nicholas Bacon, a lawyer, statesman, privy councillor, and for over twenty years until his death Englandâs highest judge as Queen Elizabethâs lord keeper of the great seal. Born on 22 January 1561, Francis was Sir Nicholas Baconâs younger son by his second wife, Ann Cooke. Besides his brother Anthony, three years his senior, Francis had a number of siblings stemming from his fatherâs first marriage. He was also related to the Cecil family, whose head, Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley, the queenâs principal minister, was his uncle by marriage. Royal officials of exceptional ability, the two brothers-in-law Nicholas Bacon and William Cecil were recently arrived members of the English governing class. They were part of an administrative elite and new service aristocracy that had taken shape under the Tudor monarchy, particularly since the later period of Henry VIIIâs reign following Englandâs break with the Catholic Church. Possessing long experience in government, they had risen to the highest positions under Queen Elizabeth and also founded landed families. With influential connections like these, Bacon might reasonably have looked forward to a successful career of his own in the crownâs service.6
Bacon manifested his extraordinary intellectual powers very early in life. In his boyhood, the queen was impressed by his precocity and wit and called him the young lord keeper. At the age of twelve he was sent to Cambridge University where he stayed for about two and a half years. In 1576 he was admitted to Grayâs Inn, of which his father was an eminent member, destined for the study of law. In the same year, in order to broaden his education and fit him for state affairs, his father arranged for him to be part of Sir Amias Pauletâs embassy to France. He remained abroad for nearly three years and was in Paris when the news of his fatherâs death in February 1579 obliged him to return home. The loss of his father significantly affected his future prospects. Sir Nicholas, owing apparently to inadvertence and delay, had neglected to make any provision for him in his will. Bacon was thus left without independent means and forced to earn his living. Law was his chosen profession; but as his chaplain, secretary, and earliest biographer, Willam Rawley, wrote, âHis heart was more carried after the affairs and placesâ of state.7 Lacking any considerable income following his fatherâs death, he continued his legal studies at Grayâs Inn. In 1582 he was admitted as an utter barrister and four years later became a bencher and thus eligible to plead in the courts at Westminster. During this time and subsequently, however, his chief aim was to obtain a position in the crownâs service. As early as the fall of 1580, therefore, he sought to enlist the patronage of his uncle Lord Burghley on his behalf in a suit of some kind to the queen.8 Although nothing came of this suit, his main objective thenceforth was to gain office and rise at court.
In 1581, at the age of twenty, he was elected for the first time to the House of Commons for the Cornish borough of Bosinney.9 This event marked the commencement of his public career. He was a member thereafter of all the successive parliaments of Queen Elizabethâs reign, the last in 1601, as well as of all but one of the parliaments of James I, taking an increasingly active part in business and acquiring a growing reputation for his knowledge and his ability as a speaker.10 Meanwhile, he pursued his quest for advancement, but without any tangible result.11 Probably with the aim of bringing his opinions before the queen and her council, he wrote two papers on public affairs at this period, both circulated only in manuscript during his lifetime. The first in 1584 was a letter of advice to Queen Elizabeth concerning her foreign and domestic enemies. In essence it was an acute, well-informed political analysis covering various features of Englandâs international and internal situation. Regarding religious dissidence at home, where the government was faced with the joint problems of Catholic disaffection and Puritan agitation against the established church, Bacon cautioned against the undue persecution of Puritan ministers, pointing out how useful they were as preachers in the battle against popery. He likewise counseled against the too severe treatment of Catholics, recommending that they be discouraged but not driven to desperation. In considering these matters, he used the phrase âreason of stateâ to indicate his standpoint.12 The second paper, composed around 1589, dealt with the controversies in the English church between the Puritan Nonconformists and the ecclesiastical authorities. Baconâs approach to this subject was moderate and evenhanded. While expressing his reverence for the bishopsâ calling, he rebuked them for various faults, including their refusal of needed reforms and their harsh and unjust treatment of Nonconformity. On the other side, he was also critical of the Puritans for some of their opinions and practices, and called their demand for âparity and equality of ministers . . . a thing of wonderful great confusion.â In the course of his discussion he referred to Machiavelli without naming him, quoting a passage from the Italian authorâs Discourses on the First Ten Books of Livy.13 Both of these papers were unusual productions, especially for a man still in his twenties and without an official position. Penetrating and thoroughly objective, they looked at the issues involved in a wholly political light.
In 1589 Bacon was granted the reversion to the clerkship of the Council in the Star Chamber, a position yielding sixteen hundred pounds yearly. Procured for him by Burghley, it was the sole office he was destined to obtain under Queen Elizabeth. As it was given him only in reversion, however, it could not become his until its present occupant vacated it, an event for which he was obliged to wait nearly twenty years, while in the meantime it brought him nothing.14 Conscious of his great powers and eager to play a role in affairs, he saw himself still without advancement as he entered his thirties. Despite his interest in the theoretical problems of the law, which is reflected in some of his early writings,15 he did not want to practice law; hence in 1592 he appealed anew to Burghley to help him gain some official position, citing his poor estate and increasing age. With this plea he coupled a statement (to which I shall return in the following chapter) of his âvast contemplative endsâ contrasted with his âmoderate civil ends,â famously adding that âI have taken all knowledge to be my province.â If Burghley did not assist him, he said, he would renounce his worldly aims and dedicate himself entirely to an intellectual occupation.16 His uncle was indisposed, though, to do much for him. His heart was set on promoting the career of his younger son, Robert Cecil, who was rising rapidly in the queenâs government, and he regarded Bacon as a possible rival to him.
Bacon had no intention, however, of laying aside his political aspirations. From an early time, moreover, the latter were linked with his philosophical ambitions; for as he wrote a few years later in an unpublished autobiographical fragment, if he gained a high position in the state, he would have the power to command the ability of others to aid him in his intellectual work.17 Around 1590 or 1591 he became acquainted with the earl of Essex, Queen Elizabethâs new favorite, with whom he soon formed a close relationship. A warrior and a courtier, intelligent, handsome, high-spirited, and generous, the youthful Essex attracted many men to him and gained a strong hold on the queenâs affection. Unfortunately, his virtues were accompanied by some serious faults. Essex was impulsive, headstrong, and sometimes petulant, lacking in sound judgment of situations, quick to take offense, and eager to triumph over his rivals at court. The aging queen humored these traits at the same time that she tried to discipline his temper; but his willfulness and demands for military commands, offices, and favors to raise his political status at court led to frequent strains and quarrels with her, which were made up only to recur. As the 1590s went on, a factional conflict for power developed between Essex, and his partisans, and the Cecils, Lord Burghley and Sir Robert Cecil and their followers, which affected the court and government.18 It was with this nobleman, five years younger than himself, that Bacon joined forces, doing various things for him, acting more and more in the capacity of an adviser, and tying his own long-deferred hopes of political advancement to the earlâs fortunes. As he wrote in his essay âOf Faction,â âmean men in their rising must adhere,â an observation that certainly reflected his own situation.19 Although he maintained his relationship with the Cecils, it naturally tended to cool on account of his attachment to Essex. His brother Anthony, with whom he was on very close terms, likewise allied himself with Essex. Anthony Bacon had lived abroad for almost thirteen years, mainly in France, as an extremely knowledgeable agent engaged in collecting political intelligence for the English government through his many foreign connections. Back in England, he entered Essexâs service in 1593 in the role of a foreign secretary, using his intelligence sources to provide the earl with the best foreign information to enhance his influence in the government.
In the parliament of 1593, Bacon made the serious mistake of provoking the queenâs displeasure by obstructing a bill to provide new taxes. The government, financially very hard-pressed by the costs of Englandâs war with Spain, was asking Parliament for an exceptional money grant of three subsidies payable in only three years. While Bacon did not oppose this amount, he argued in the House of Commons for spreading its payment over six years lest the tax set a dangerous precedent, breed popular discontent, and lay too heavy a burden on the country. When he learned of Elizabethâs anger at his conduct, he wrote explaining himself to Burghley, whom he told that he spoke his conscience, and asked to intercede to restore him to the queenâs favor.20 As Baconâs tactics in the political arena were usually carefully calculated with a view to his own fortunes, his statement that he spoke his conscience was doubtless sincere. This was the last time, though, that he ever took an ind...