THE COLOUR OF JUSTICE
BASED ON THE TRANSCRIPTS OF
THE STEPHEN LAWRENCE INQUIRY
Editorâs Note
THE LAWRENCE INQUIRY consisted of 69 days of public hearings. The evidence is still sinking in and continues to be debated in police circles, among lawyers, in Britainâs black community, and elsewhere. Sir William Macpherson and his inquiry team published their final report in February 1999, nearly six years after Stephen Lawrenceâs death. Its conclusions will provoke further controversy. It may be years before its full impact can be appreciated.
The transcripts of the inquiry amount to more than eleven thousand pages, which I have distilled into about a hundred â less than one per cent. Inevitably I have had to make brutal choices about which witnesses and which exchanges to include. It has not been easy. I have not included the evidence of Detective Superintendent Ian Crampton who was in charge of the case for the first few days and took the vital decision to delay arresting five suspects. âOne of the things I have to say with hindsight,â he told the inquiry, âis that knowing what I now know I would have arrested earlier.â He later conceded that the police had âreasonable groundsâ to arrest two days after Stephenâs murder.
I have not included the evidence of Detective Superintendent Brian Weeden, who took over from Crampton. He, too, failed to arrest, suggesting at one point that he did not have the authority. Michael Mansfield QC, the Lawrence familyâs counsel, asked Weeden, âDo you not find it rather disturbing that it has taken all this time for you to recognise a basic tenet of criminal law?â, to which Weeden replied, âI think it is regrettable.â
I have not included the evidence of Sir Paul Condon, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, who apologised to Doreen and Neville Lawrence but denied that racism played a role in the investigation into Stephenâs murder. He urged the inquiry not to label his force as âinstitutionally racistâ.
Also not included is the evidence of Imran Khan, the Lawrence familyâs solicitor, who did so much to bring Stephenâs murder, and the police handling of the case, to public attention. Also this play does not cover the inquiryâs later evidence heard outside London.
I set out to include the most telling exchanges for a theatre audience, many of whom did not hit the headlines at the time but which reflect the interlocking threads which ran throughout the inquiry â police incompetence, conscious or unconscious racism and stereotyping, and the hint of corruption in the background. And I have included exchanges which reflect the personal tensions between the police and the Lawrence family â for example, Doreenâs anger when she saw Detective Chief Superintendent William Ilsley, who supervised the investigation, âfold upâ as he put it, âscrew upâ as she said, a piece of paper she handed him containing the names of suspects.
Above all, I wanted to select evidence of the inquiry which presented as fair, balanced and rounded a picture as possible. It was not an easy task. But if it contributes to a greater understanding of all the issues involved, it was, I hope, worthwhile and valuable.
The Colour of Justice is the fourth of what have come to be known as The Tribunal Plays performed at the Tricycle Theatre in London. The first, in 1994, was Half the Picture, a dramatisation of the Scott âarms to Iraqâ inquiry, which was followed by Nuremberg and Srebrenica.
Richard Norton-Taylor
London 1999
Chronology
1993
Thursday 22 April 10:30pm
Stephen Lawrence stabbed to death.
Friday 23 April
A letter giving names of the suspects left in a phone box. Statements made to the police by various people about the attacks. âGrantâ, a young man who had previously provided information, goes to the police station and accuses the Acourts of the murder.
Sunday 25 April
Neville and Doreen Lawrence approach Imran Khan to act as their solicitor.
Monday 26 April
Police surveillance of the suspectsâ homes begins.
Tuesday 27 April
Detective Sergeant Davidson informed that an eyewitness, âKâ, had been on a bus which passed the site of the murder.
Friday 30 April
More evidence obtained that the Acourts had been near the site of the murder on the evening of 22 April.
Tuesday 4 May
Press conference held. Neville Lawrence states, âNothing has been done. There have been no arrests and the police wonât tell us what is happening.â
Thursday 6 May
The Lawrences meet Nelson Mandela.
Friday 7 May
The Acourts and Dobson arrested and made to appear in an identity parade.
Saturday 8 May
An anti-racist march held in protest at the British National Party (BNP) bookshop in Welling.
Monday 10 May
Luke Knight arrested.
Thursday 13 May
Duwayne Brooks identifies Neil Acourt in an identity parade.
Wednesday 19 May
Interview of alleged eyewitness, âKâ.
Thursday 3 June
Duwayne Brooks identifies Luke Knight in a further identity parade.
June
After the date for the criminal proceedings is set, Stephen Lawrenceâs body is released and buried in Jamaica.
July
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) drops the prosecution. The identification evidence from Duwayne Brooks is not considered good enough to secure the conviction of Neil Acourt and Luke Knight: âAfter careful consideration of the available evidence in this case, we have decided there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic conviction.â The five suspects are discharged.
October
Duwayne arrested and charged with criminal damage and violent disorder during the protest rally at Welling held on 15 May. Detective Chief Superintendent Barker brought in to review the police investigation. The Barker Report finds that the investigation had progressed satisfactorily and that all lines of inquiry had been correctly pursued. Later, in the inquiry, he admits that he intentionally covered up any criticism of Detective Superintendent Weeden, the Senior Investigating Officer. Later in the year the inquest opens, with Michael Mansfield QC appearing for the family. Mansfield asks for an indefinite adjournment.
1994
The renewed police investigation gives evidence to the CPS.
April
The CPS refuses to prosecute. âDespite the policeâs painstaking and thorough investigation, we concluded that on the basis of the information available there ...