Constructions of children and childhood
Current understandings and constructions of children and childhood are informed, among other influences, by postmodern views of children and childhood, the sociology of childhood, and the childrenās rights movement (Alanen, 2001; Corsaro, 1997; Einarsdóttir, 2007; Harcourt & Gray, 2013). Perspectives that emphasise childhood, viewed as a social construction from a sociological perspective, place an emphasis on children as social actors and citizens, rather than as deficient adults. Childhood and children are, therefore, considered as worthy of investigation in their own right, separate from their parents or caregivers (Corsaro, 1997; Christensen & James, 2008a; James & Prout, 1990). In the past, traditional understandings of childhood emphasised developmentally appropriate practices, informed exclusively through a reliance on developmental theories, which tended to view childrenās development as moving towards adulthood, at times with greater emphasis on what a child was not yet able to do, rather than highlighting the childās ability and competence. As summarised by Mayall (1994, p. 1):
Childrenās lives are lived through childhoods constructed for them by adultsā understandings of childhood and what children are and should be.
Such a perspective contributed to a view of childhood that overlooked childhood agency and prioritised regulating childrenās learning to what is considered to be normal development (Atwater, Carta, Schwartz & McConnell, 1994). More recent perspectives conceptualise children as strong, capable and knowledgeable experts on their own lives, possessing knowledge, perspective and interest that is best gained from the children themselves (Malaguzzi, 1994; Mashford-Scott & Church, 2011). Underpinning this perspective is recognition that children have agency, defined as āthe power to make decisions that impact on self and others and act on themā (Sancar & Severcan 2010, p. 277). Childrenās exercise of agency can best be understood in relation to the social, cultural and political contexts in which it occurs, and in connection with adult agency. Recognising childrenās agency in research posits a view that children are individuals who experience their worlds in unique ways and that these unique experiences are a valued focus of study (Greene & Hill, 2005). Research using creative, diverse methodological approaches has provided evidence that young children are reliable informants, capable of contributing unique and valuable information (Clark, 2017; Clark & Moss, 2001; Mayne et al., 2018).
Competing paradigms and values have informed our understanding of childhood in recent decades. Childhood is now understood primarily through the lens of social constructionism and children are viewed as active participants constructing their own learning (Mayall, 2000; Smith, 2007). Notwithstanding the variety of contexts and frameworks in which childrenās perspectives and views are sought, a common aim that draws together all such research is that it strives to generate greater knowledge and understanding about the richness of childrenās lives (Kellet, 2011). Research with young children has been influenced by discourses of childrenās rights and citizenship. Childrenās competence to participate in research and their ability to express their opinions has also been clearly articulated in the UNCRC (United Nations, 1989).
General Comment 7 (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 1989), emphasises the rights of all children, including young children, to be consulted in matters that affect them. Specifically, Article 12 of the convention emphasises the right that a child who is capable of forming his or her own view should have the right to express these views freely on all matters affecting the child and that those views should be given weight in accordance with age and maturity (United Nations, 1989). Four key dimensions, which are relevant to designing and carrying out research with young children, are highlighted in Article 12 as follows: space to generate opportunities for childrenās expression of their views; voice, to ensure that these views are expressed effectively; audience, to ensure that childrenās views are listened to; and influence, to ensure that young childrenās views are listened to and acted on.
Four key dimensions to conceptualize the provision of Article 12 (UNCHR, 1989); Lundy (2007, p. 933 cited in Tay-Lim & Lim, 2013)
Space: Creating opportunities for children to express their views
Voice: Facilitating the expression of these views
Audience: Actively listening to these views
Influence: Responding appropriately to these views